Browse Topic: Vehicle integration
U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (DEVCOM), Aviation & Missile Center (AvMC) developed a Digital Backbone for the Rotorcraft Applied Systems Concepts Airborne Lab (RASCAL-X) UH-60M for rapid Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) mission system integrations. The RASCAL-X Digital Backbone is the cornerstone of a unique experimental flight test capability connecting the experimental research flight control system with the Mission Systems Flying Testbed (MSFTB) and other mission system components. The Digital Backbone with MSFTB provides a suite of capabilities to integrate, assess, and flight test Mission Systems Under Test. The RASCAL-X Digital Backbone supports many of the physical aspects of mission system integration by providing Nodal Points with provisioning for power, data, and connectivity. Numerous challenges in Digital Backbone design, fabrication and installation were successfully addressed and solved during the development effort. The RASCAL-X Digital Backbone installation was completed in February 2025.
This paper will present the use of a licensed open-source software application based on commercially available off-the-shelf hardware for the control and data acquisition of aerospace system integration test rigs. System integration test rigs are complex systems requiring real-time deterministic control and high-speed data acquisition. Various aircraft flight systems and subsystems can be tested to see if they interact as they would on the aircraft without an airframe. These systems are critical to ensure interoperability during the development phase and facilitate the interchangeability of actual flight hardware, prototypes, and simulation models throughout the development cycle. Deploying open, flexible, and highly configurable real-time control and data acquisition systems ensures that development milestones will be achieved cost-effectively, whether using actual flight hardware or working with a simulation. This is because, as the prototype hardware is developed, the remaining aircraft systems can still be tested by interacting with the model.
The Advanced Helicopter Seating System (AHSS) was started as an effort to evaluate and improve the current state of military rotorcraft seating. The overall goal of the program has been to improve pilot ergonomics and safety through the integration of advanced energy absorption and vibration reduction mechanisms as well as a broad approach to system integration based around updated occupant anthropometrics. An entirely new seating solution has been developed, with intent to integrate with the AH-64 Apache platform for demonstration purposes. The AH-64 development culminated with a series of static tests and dynamic test events to measure the effectiveness of the safety systems integrated on the seat as compared to the legacy AH-64 seating system. While lumbar load data and seat stroke data was obtained, issues with the anthropomorphic test device (ATD) configuration at the 95th male configuration caused some data to be suspect, and premature failure of several components also caused loss of capturing accurate data. Lessons learned are documented in the conclusions. Data and lessons learned from this effort are being used to support a follow-on effort to develop a pilot seat for the UH-60 Black Hawk Platform.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
This Engineering Bulletin and its annexes provide guidance on the application of Human Engineering principles and practices to the analysis, design, development, testing, fielding, support, accident investigation, and training for military and commercial products throughout their intended life cycles.
With modern aerospace vehicle configurations, highly-coupled redundant flight control surfaces are becoming standard practice. For such vehicles, traditional System Identification (SID) methods may not accurately capture the individual contributions of effectors to the vehicle bare-airframe response. A Joint Input-Output (JIO) methodology was used to estimate the control power for each highly-correlated roll effector of the Bell V-280 hover configuration. The methodology was demonstrated using flight test data, where the identification results were compared to a high-fidelity hardware-in-the-loop simulation in the V-280 System Integration Lab.
This interface standard applies to fuzes used in airborne weapons that use a 3-in fuze well. It defines: Physical envelope of the fuze well at the interface with the fuze. Load bearing surfaces of the fuze well. Physical envelope of the fuze and its connector. Mechanical features (e.g., clocking feature). Connector type, size, location and orientation. Retaining ring and its mechanical features (e.g., thread, tool interface). Physical envelope of the retaining ring at the interface with the fuze. Physical space available for installation tools. Torque that the installation tool shall be capable of providing. This standard does not address: Materials used or their properties. Protective finish. Physical environment of the weapon. Explosive interface or features (e.g., insensitive munitions (IM) mitigation). Charging tube. Torque on the retaining ring or loads on the load bearing surfaces. Each fuze and weapon combination should be evaluated to ensure that the weapon system will satisfy all safety, reliability, and performance requirements throughout its lifecycle.
The Tiltrotor Test Rig (TTR) is a NASA project, joint with the U.S. Army and Air Force, to develop a new, large-scale proprotor test system for the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex (NFAC). The first wind-tunnel entry was completed in November 2018 with a modern, 26-ft diameter proprotor. The primary purpose was to complete the development of the TTR, including systems integration with the NFAC. The TTR and rotor were tested up to 273 knots in axial flow. This is the highest airspeed ever achieved by a full-scale proprotor in any wind tunnel. Extensive conversion-mode data were also acquired, and hover/climb conditions were explored. Additional testing included aerodynamic tares, motor tests, thermal tests, modal vibration tests, and other checkout activities. This paper summarizes the results of the test, including examples of the most significant data.
Helicopter is a complex system regarding integration of systems. During development phase of a new H/C, design office deal with MMEL (Master Minimum List Equipment), Optional equipment package for specific missions (i.e. Oil & Gas, SAR...) and Manufacturing constraints for lead-time and cost optimization. The Geometrical Management presented today is derived from ARP4754A standard in Aeronautics. The Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) is a guideline for development of civil aircraft and systems. This process, based on end to end philosophy defines the way of managing geometrical specifications concerning the aircraft during its complete lifecycle. System geometrical Management starts with System Engineering by functional analysis of the Helicopter vehicle during Design development phase, then APQP focus on industrial maturity and repeatability during industrialization phase and finally control plan is deployed after Entry into service for serial life This is a top-down approach leading to systems specification at each level of the Aircraft assembly, as in Final assembly line for H/C assembly and tests, Systems level and elementary parts. Handling capacity, Modularity and Maintenance capacity (Interchangeability), Tightness, Etc.
Items per page:
50
1 – 50 of 632