Browse Topic: Crash research
In the context of Rotorcraft Pilot Couplings, the biomechanics of the pilot body play a fundamental role in determining the stability of the pilot-vehicle closed loop system. The response of the pilot body is, in turn, inherently stochastic, being a function of pilot biometrics and muscular activation. Coupling the statistical distribution of pilot biomechanical behavior determined in specialized experimental campaign with linear models of the helicopter heave dynamics, an uncertainty propagation procedure is developed, with the aim of estimating the statistical distribution of the stability margins of the closed loop pilot-vehicle system. Results obtained varying the collective lever characteristics, as well as the helicopter model parameters, align well with results obtained previously in deterministic settings. However, the new scheme allows to define quantitative robustness indices.
ABSTRACT
This work presents the results of a piloted flight simulator campaign aimed at measuring biomechanical performance indicators -- upper limbs motion and electromiography of main muscle bundles -- of pilots performing complex, realistic tasks. Ship deck landings performed by a single pilot, flying several helicopter configurations with sea conditions of increasing intensity have been considered. The analysis of the results shows an increase in muscular activity in relation with the increase in task difficulty, in agreement with subjective ratings (Bedford workload scale). The study provided useful indications to improve the corresponding biomechanical simulations, as well as to characterize pilot performance during specific tasks.
The paper investigates structural coupling problems in tiltrotor aircraft. A detailed tiltrotor model, representative of the Bell XV-15, has been built. The airframe model has been modified with a thinner wing to better reveal structural coupling proneness. A linearized FCS has been introduced to analyze the overall stability on an extended frequency band, ranging from the flight mechanics up to the aeroelastic modes. In addition to the FCS, biomechanical models of the pilot, acting on the power-lever and on the center stick, are included in feedback loop. Overall stability analyses demonstrate that the FCS improves handling qualities although several structural coupling mechanisms arise, in combination with the involuntary pilot's response, reducing flutter clearance. A modified version of the XV-15, using differential collective pitch for yaw control in airplane mode, has been also investigated. This configuration reduces costs and weights although the FCS destabilizes the
ABSTRACT This work investigates rotorcraft-pilot coupling phenomena in tiltrotors. A detailed tiltrotor model, representative of the Bell-Boeing XV-15, has been built. Biomechanical models of the pilot, acting on the power lever and on the centre stick, are included in feedback loop to define the Pilot-Vehicle System. Pilot-Assisted Oscillation phenomena are investigated on the overall conversion corridor using Nyquist's criterion. Pilot-in-the-loop analyses demonstrate that a critical parameter is detected in the vertical fins geometry. Due to an asymmetric flaperons deflection the wing's wake impacts on the vertical fins, producing a side force. The pulsating tail-side-force makes the fuselage to yaw and excites the asymmetric wing chord mode coupled with the lateral pilot's biomechanics, leading to a reduction, or even a loss, of stability. No unstable event is detected about the longitudinal direction. Conversely, a resonance between the pilot's biomechanics and the aircraft poorly
This SAE Recommended Practice presents a method and example results for determining the Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL) for automotive motion control electrical and electronic (E/E) systems. The ASIL determination activity is required by ISO 26262-3:2011 [1], and it is intended that the process and results herein are consistent with ISO 26262:2011 [1]. The technical focus of this document is on vehicle motion control systems. It is limited to passenger cars weighing up to 3.5 metric tons. Furthermore, the scope of this recommended practice is limited to collision-related hazards associated with motion control systems. The recommended practice focused on motion control systems since the hazards they can create generally have higher ASIL ratings, as compared to the hazards non-motion control systems can create. Because of this, the Functional Safety Committee decided to give motion control systems a higher priority and focus exclusively on them in the SAE J2980 recommended
The paper investigates the basic mechanism of aeroservoelastic Pilot Assisted Oscillation phenomenon (PAO) about the roll axis due to the interaction with the pilot's arm biomechanics. The motivation stems from the observation that a rotor imbalance may occur as a consequence of rotor cyclic lead-lag modes excitation. The instability mechanism is analogous to the 'air resonance' phenomenon, in which the pilot's involuntary action plays the role of the AFCS. Using robust stability analysis, the paper demonstrates that, in particular, the introduction of a gain and a time-delay between the stick motion and the servoactuator displacements may reduce the gain and phase margins of the pilotvehicle system. The mechanism of instability proves that the pilot biodynamics is participating to the destabilization of the system by inputting energy directly into the flapping mode. This destabilizes the airframe roll motion which, in turn, causes lag motion imbalance. It is found that, depending on
This SAE Recommended Practice presents a method and example results for determining the Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL) for automotive electrical and electronic (E/E) systems. This activity is required by ISO 26262-3:2011 [1], and it is intended that the process and results herein are consistent with ISO 26262:2011 [1]. The technical focus of this document is on vehicle motion control systems. It is limited to passenger cars weighing up to 3.5 metric tons. Furthermore, the scope of this recommended practice is limited to collision-related hazards. ISO 26262:2011 [1] has a wider scope than SAE J2980, covering other functions and accidents (not just motion control or collisions as in SAE J2980).
Items per page:
50
1 – 50 of 331