Browse Topic: Turbofan engines

Items (56)
The current steady-state performance-based system studies are not adequate to evaluate certain advanced technologies for the challenges associated with meeting the transient performance requirements without better definition and control of component operating margins. Additional dynamic analyses would require more detailed, physics-based, component-level models and controllers in order to better identify dynamic issues that may arise during operation of the engine. The additional complexity in these models increases the effort necessary throughout the design processes, including the system-analysis step. The solution would be a physics-based engine model with full envelope controller. C-MAPSS and C-MAPSS40k are examples of engine models with full envelope controllers, but because they are designed to model a specific engine, they are not good candidates for systems analysis.
A Transonic Small Disturbance code originally developed at Canadair for the analysis of 3D wing/body/pylon/store configurations (AGARD CP-412-8) has been extended to calculate flows around complete aircraft such as the Challenger Executive Jet. The program uses a modified Transonic Small Disturbance equation discretized in cartesian and cylindrical coordinates and a grid embedding technique to capture flow details around specific components. The equation is solved using a successive line over-relaxation technique applied in two phases. In the first phase, the flow field is relaxed in the overall crude grid and in the winglet cylindrical grid. In the second phase, the crude grid and the various embedded fine grids are relaxed in alternating steps. The interaction between the various grids is through simple linear interpolation. The program is capable of representing Challenger-type wide body fuselages, large aspect ratio supercritical wings, high by-pass turbofan engines and canted
Kafyeke, F.Piperni, P.Robin, S.
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 56