Browse Topic: Refrigerants

Items (71)
The purpose of this SAE Standard is to establish the specific minimum equipment requirements for recovery/recycling/recharge equipment intended for use with both R-1234yf and R-134a in a common refrigerant circuit that has been directly removed from, and is intended for reuse in, mobile air-conditioning (A/C) systems. This document does not apply to equipment used for R-1234yf and R-134a having a common enclosure with separate circuits for each refrigerant, although some amount of separate circuitry for each refrigerant could be used.
Interior Climate Control Service Committee
This SAE Standard applies to refrigerant vapor compression systems that provide cooling and/or heating for passenger cars, light trucks, and commercial vehicles (on and off road) that use automotive type mobile air conditioning (MAC) systems. Large trucks, buses, and other vehicles that do not use typical automotive A/C systems or use refrigerants not listed in this document are not covered by this standard. This standard covers vehicles with MAC systems using belt driven compressors and electric motor driven compressors. This document provides industry-recognized standards for the design, assembly, and test of MAC systems, including necessary service equipment, and is intended to cover all phases of the lifetime of MAC systems to minimize environmental, health, and safety impacts. The standards listed in this document cover the currently accepted industry guidelines and procedures. The standards can be used as requirements for regulatory authorities to meet minimum environmental, health, and safety requirements. Also included are cautionary statements for the service industry to alert technicians to the inadvisability and possible health or safety effects associated with venting refrigerant during service. It is not intended to restrict the use, or further development of, other types of refrigerants or refrigeration systems for MAC applications. This document may be amended, or additional safety standards created, should other refrigerants or refrigeration systems become practical. This document addresses only HFC-134a (R-134a), carbon dioxide (R-744), HFO-1234yf (R-1234yf), and HFC-152a (R-152a) refrigerants. For R-152a refrigerants, this standard will only apply to secondary loop systems. To prevent system contamination, all refrigerants used in MAC vapor compression systems require unique service fittings and service equipment. The unique service fittings are intended to significantly reduce the potential for refrigerant cross-contamination during service activities. CFC-12 (R-12) is no longer in use in new MAC systems. The service fitting description is maintained as a reference for older vehicles still in use. When retrofitting an R-12 system to use R-134a or when removing R-12 (during vehicle disposal), use service equipment designed for R-12 and certified to meet the requirements of SAE J1990 (R-12 recovery and recycle equipment).
Interior Climate Control Vehicle OEM Committee
This SAE Standard describes methods to understand the risks associated with vehicle mobile air conditioning (MAC) systems in all aspects of a vehicle’s lifecycle including design, production, assembly, operation, and end of life. Information for input to the risk assessment is provided in the appendices of this document. This information should not be considered to be complete, but only a reference of some of the data needed for a complete analysis of the risk associated with the use of refrigerants in MAC systems.
Interior Climate Control Vehicle OEM Committee
The purpose of this SAE Standard is to establish the specific minimum equipment performance requirements for recovery and recycling of HFC-134a that has been directly removed from, and is intended for reuse in, mobile air-conditioning (A/C) systems. It also is intended to establish requirements for equipment used to recharge HFC-134a to an accuracy level that meets Section 9 of this document and SAE J2099. The requirements apply to the following types of service equipment and their specific applications. a Recovery/recycling equipment b Recovery/recycling-refrigerant charging c Refrigerant recharging equipment only
Interior Climate Control Service Committee
The intent of this standard is to establish a framework to assure that all evaporators for R-744 and R-1234yf mobile air conditioning (MAC) systems shall meet appropriate testing and labeling requirements. SAE J639 requires an assement to be performed to minimize reasonable risks in MAC systems. The evaporator (as designed and manufactured) shall be part of that risk assessment, and it is the responsibility of the vehicle manufacturer to assure all relevant aspects of the evaporator are included. It is the responsibility of all vehicle or evaporator manufacturers to comply with the standards of this document at a minimum. (Substitution of specific test procedures by vehicle manufactures that correlate well to field return data is acceptable.) As appropriate, this standard can be used as a guide to support risk assessments. With regard to certification, most vehicle manufacturers have established formal production part approval processes (PPAP) where compliance certification is established and formally documented. For an evaporator manufacturer of non-original equipment parts (or a vehicle manufacturer that does not have a formal part compliance certification process), then the certification described in this standard is the requirement to which those evaporators shall comply. In this case, the evaporator manufacturer or an independent institution shall complete the evaporator certification according to SAE J2911. An example of the latter would be the completion of witness testing by the evaporator manufacturer with the submission of certification documents by the witness organization. Refrigerant R-152a was excluded from this standard because a secondary loop refrigerant system is required. This standard also does not apply to R-134a refrigerant evaporators because it is proven in use.
Interior Climate Control MAC Supplier Committee
Effect of Magnetic Nanorefrigerant on Electric Vehicle2017-01-222210/8/2017
The ever increasing popularity of electric vehicles and higher requirement on safety and comfort has led heat pump air conditioning system indispensable in electric vehicle. Many studies have shown that the addition of nano particles contributes to great improvement on thermal conductivity than that of conventional refrigerants. Therefore, the application of the magnetic nanorefrigerant in heat pump air conditioning system has massive potential to heighten the heat transfer efficiency. This paper aims at studying the magnetic nanorefrigerant comprised of the magnetic nano powder Fe3O4 and refrigerant R134a. According to the relevant theoretical analyses and empirical formula, the heat transfer coefficient, density, viscosity, and other physical parameters are calculated approximately. In the heat pump air conditioning system of a certain type of electric vehicle, the special working condition parameters are selected to carry out calculation analysis with numerical analysis software. The results show that the heat exchange amount of this nanorefrigerant is 21.23% higher than the pure refrigerant R134a and increases with the volume fraction of the nano particles. Moreover, after adding Fe3O4 nano materials to the heat pump air conditioning system, the efficiency of this system has been increased by 8.6%. So the conclusion can be drawn that appliance of the nano-refrigerant in electric vehicle is both effective and feasible.
Liu, ZhenYangWang, Xihui
Research on the Application of Micro-Channel Evaporator in R134a Roof-Top Bus Air Conditioner2017-01-01613/28/2017
This study investigates the cycle performance and potential advantages of the replacement of fin-and-tube evaporator with parallel flow micro-channel evaporator, in R134a roof-top bus air conditioner (AC) system. The heat exchangers for bus AC system are featured by a stringent space height limitation. The configuration of inclined four piece or six piece micro-channel evaporators was proposed to satisfy this space requirement, instead of original two piece fin-and-tube evaporators. Additionally, the individual superheat control method with thermostatic expansive valve (TXV) in each evaporator was adopted to improve refrigerant distribution. Three kinds of micro-channel evaporators were designed and equipped in an 8-m roof-top bus AC system. Except the replacement of evaporators, TXV and connecting pipes, other cycle components were kept same. Comparison experiments were carried out to evaluate the cycle performance with micro-channel evaporator configuration in psychometric calorimeter test facility at rated cooling condition. Experiment results, including R134a refrigerant charge, superheat performance, cooling capacity and system coefficient of performance (COP) were compared between micro-channel evaporator system and fin-and-tube evaporator system. Results show that individual superheat control method improved the superheat distribution uniformity among multiple evaporators, and enhanced the system cooling capacity. Besides, the optimum micro-channel evaporator configuration achieved equal cooling capacity and COP with fin-and-tube evaporators. Furthermore, potential advantages including refrigerant charge reduction, cost saving, system mass reduction, and compact installation were also discussed for the application of micro-channel evaporator in roof-top bus AC system.
Wang, DandongLiu, CichongChen, Jiangping
Experimental Evaluation of an Automobile Air - Conditioning System with and without Liquid Suction Heat Exchanger2016-01-91105/18/2016
This study involves the experimental aspects of R134a Automobile Air Conditioning (AAC) system with & without Liquid Suction Heat Exchanger (LSHX). To evaluate the performance of an Automobile Air Conditioning system, an experimental system consisting of original components from an R134a Automobile Air Conditioning system has been set up and instrumented. An additional Liquid Suction Heat Exchanger is used in conventional Automobile Air Conditioning system. Effect of evaporator temperature variation & compressor speed variation on R134a Automobile Air Conditioning system performance is evaluated. From experimental evaluation, it is derived that there is a Coefficient of Performance (COP) improvement in Automobile Air Conditioning system with Liquid Suction Heat Exchanger compared to Automobile Air Conditioning system without Liquid Suction Heat Exchanger. Performance of an R134a Automobile Air Conditioning system degrades with increase in compressor speed. From refrigerant side, it is concluded that overall Coefficient of Performance improvement is about 2.54% with Liquid Suction Heat Exchanger with 45.83% effectiveness. From air side calculation, it is found that Coefficient of Performance improvement is about 7.51% in Automobile Air Conditioning system with Liquid Suction Heat Exchanger compared to Automobile Air Conditioning system without Liquid Suction Heat Exchanger.
Vaghela, Jignesh
Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Microchannel Evaporator Design on the Performance of Two-Phase Ejector Automotive Air Conditioning Cycles2015-01-03624/14/2015
Much attention has been given in recent years to the use of two-phase ejectors and particularly to the performance of the standard ejector cycle with a liquid-vapor separator. However, this cycle may not be the best choice for automotive applications due to the large size required by an efficient separator as well as the cycle's performance at conditions of lower ejector potential. A limited amount of recent research has focused on alternate two-phase ejector cycles that may be better suited for automotive applications. One of these cycles, using the ejector to allow for evaporation at two different temperatures and eliminating the need for a separator, will be the subject of investigation in this paper. Previous investigations of this cycle have been mainly theoretical or experimental; this paper aims to provide a numerical analysis of the effect of evaporator design on the performance of the ejector cycles. In this paper, a numerical model of a microchannel evaporator is developed and incorporated into thermodynamic models of the standard and alternate two-phase ejector cycle. R134a is used as the working fluid, though the results could be expanded to R1234yf due to the similar properties of the two fluids. Data from the authors' previous experimental investigation of the alternate ejector cycle is used to validate the numerical model. The evaporator model for the alternate cycle is modified to allow for two different evaporation temperatures. The effect of the ratio of low-temperature to high-temperature evaporator area on the performance of the cycle is explored, and comparison is made between the performance of the alternate ejector cycle and the standard ejector cycle. The effect of operation at conditions of lower ejector potential, or reduced ejector efficiency, on the performance of the ejector cycles is also investigated, and both cycles are compared to a baseline cycle without an ejector in order to obtain a realistic idea of the improvement that can be achieved with ejector air conditioning cycles. It is seen that evaporator design, not just ejector design, can have a significant effect on the COP of ejector cycles.
Lawrence, NealElbel, Stefan
An Experimentally Validated Model for Predicting Refrigerant and Lubricant Inventory in MAC Heat Exchangers2014-01-06944/1/2014
The paper presents a semi-empirical model to predict refrigerant and lubricant inventory in both evaporator and condenser of an automotive air conditioning (MAC) system. In the model, heat exchanger is discretized into small volumes. Temperature, pressure and mass inventory are calculated by applying heat transfer, pressure drop and void fraction correlations to these volumes respectively. Refrigerant and lubricant are treated as a zeotropic mixture with a temperature glide. As refrigerant evaporates or condenses, thermophysical properties are evaluated accordingly with the change of lubricant concentration. Experimental data is used to validate the model. As a result, refrigerant and lubricant mass is predicted within 20% in the evaporator. However, in the condenser, lubricant mass was consistently under-predicted while refrigerant mass was predicted within 15% error. Moreover, the lubricant under-prediction becomes more significant at higher Oil Circulation Ratio (OCR). The analysis showed that the lubricant is separated from the flow in the condenser header and starts to accumulate in the bottom channels. The temperature profile in the infrared image supports this hypothesis, as the temperature of the bottom channels is much lower. After correcting this by counting in the bottom lubricant mass, the model predicts condenser lubricant mass consistently within 15% error.
Jin, ShenghanHrnjak, Predrag
Ways to Determine Vehicle Dual AC System Charge Level2014-01-06974/1/2014
This paper addresses various ways to determine vehicle dual AC system charge level. Traditionally, either checking charge level plateau and/or using the certain condenser outlet subcooling magnitude are adopted to determine AC system charge level. It is challenging to determine refrigerant charge level in the following scenarios: (1) Some AC systems do not exhibit the flatted charge plateau. (2) The condenser outlet subcooling continues to rise. (3) The system has the requirements to run both front and aux evaporators, front evaporator only and aux evaporator only. It was found that compressor compression ratio of absolute discharge pressure to absolute suction pressure always presents the bath tub curve for all AC systems. When the system reaches the optimal charge level, the evaporator air outlet temperatures show the stable trend. In addition to the traditional condenser subcooling method, few approaches are presented in the paper. One way to determine the dual evaporator system charge level is: checking compressor compression ratios vs. charge level on the tests with (1) running both front and aux evaporators, (2) running front evaporator only (aux evaporator off). In addition, checking front evaporator discharge air temperature is introduced. The second way to determine the dual evaporator system charge level is: using compressor refrigerant density ratio of discharge to suction vs. charge level. The third way to determine the dual evaporator charge level is: using AC system unit energy efficiency vs. charge level and compressor mass flowrate vs. charge level. By adding more depth analyses on system and compressor behaviors, the optimal charge of the dual evaporator system becomes an obvious selection when there is a challenge in using the traditional condenser subcooling method.
Zheng, Yinhua
Refrigerant Charge Management and Control for Next-Generation Aircraft Vapor Compression Systems2013-01-22419/17/2013
Vapor compression systems (VCS) offer significant benefits as the backbone for next generation aircraft thermal management systems (TMS). For a comparable lift, VCS offer higher system efficiencies, improved load temperature control, and lower transport losses than conventional air cycle systems. However, broad proliferation of VCS for many aircraft applications has been limited primarily due to maintenance and reliability concerns. In an attempt to address these and other VCS system control issues, the Air Force Research Laboratory has established a Vapor Cycle System Research Facility (VCSRF) to explore the practical application of dynamic VCS control methods for next-generation, military aircraft TMS. The total refrigerant mass contained within the closed refrigeration system (refrigerant charge) is a critical parameter to VCS operational readiness. Too much or too little refrigerant can be detrimental to system performance. Extreme values of refrigerant charge can lead to a loss of evaporator temperature control, loss of high side pressure control, or other potentially catastrophic occurrences. The objective of this work is to examine real-time methods for determination of acceptable refrigerant charge in a prototypical VCS system, as a function of operational points, using only sensors already utilized in the control system (in-situ control sensors). It is envisioned that studies such as these can be used to guide development of a simple in-situ prognostic tool for system state-of-health indication (i.e. “Red Light, Yellow Light, Green Light”), with respect to level of charge, and to enable on-demand maintenance. Additionally, a method for continuous management of refrigerant charge as a means for optimizing system efficiency over a range of dynamic operating points is presented.
Puntel, AnthonyEmo, StephenMichalak, Travis E.Ervin, JamieByrd, LarryTsao, VictorReitz, Thomas
High Efficiency Subcool Condenser2013-01-12954/8/2013
Sustainable reduction of the CO2 emissions of future vehicles goes hand in hand with the increase in efficiency of ancillary units. Of particular importance is the reduction of fuel consumption attributed to the vehicle's air conditioning system. The innovative development of a condenser with a 3-pass subcooling zone renders it possible to significantly increase the efficiency of the cooling circuit. This is applicable both in the case of current and future refrigerants. The basis for increasing the efficiency of the condenser is rooted in the systematic analysis of the local heat transfer functions, pressure drops and implementation of an improved flow path configuration. The current condenser design, which includes the functionality of a receiver/dryer with a dedicated subcooling zone, is effective at providing stable liquid refrigerant to the TXV under a variety of conditions. By optimally adapting the flow cross-section to the density change of the refrigerant and increasing the subcooling function by means of a 3-pass flow subcooling zone, it is possible to achieve a significantly lower outlet temperature of the refrigerant. The locally higher pressure drop in the subcooling zone does not have a negative impact on the vapor compression circuit and can therefore be used to increase efficiency without the risk of losses. The theoretical derivation, as well as simulation and measurement results for the new condenser, are presented and discussed in comparison with conventional designs. A new condenser specification has been derived and validated for the system-oriented evaluation of the component. Finally, the validation results from the circuit and vehicle measurements in the wind tunnel are presented. The newly developed condenser resulted in a significant increase of 4% of evaporator performance while maintaining mass and package space. Alternatively, weight and conduction depth can be reduced by 25% while maintaining capacity and system efficiency.
Wawzyniak, MarkusWalter, ChristophKemle, AndreasDavid, Guillaume
Experimental and Analytical Investigation of Two-Phase Ejector Air-Conditioning Cycles Using Low-Pressure Refrigerants R134a and R1234yf2013-01-14954/8/2013
Two-phase ejectors have received increased attention in recent years because of their ability to improve the performance of automotive air-conditioning cycles by means of expansion work recovery. Much attention in recent years has been given to how high-pressure fluids, such as carbon dioxide, perform with ejector cycles; high-pressure fluids tend to have higher throttling loss, making them more attractive for expansion work recovery cycles, such as the two-phase ejector cycle. However, low-pressure fluids, such as those commonly used in automotive air-conditioning applications, tend to offer significantly lower work recovery potential. Nonetheless, the limited previous work on low-pressure refrigerants in ejector systems has shown that there is some improvement potential when using these fluids with ejector cycles. This paper presents the results of experimental and analytical investigations in which the performance of the low-pressure fluids R134a and R1234yf is compared between a conventional cycle without an ejector and several two-phase ejector cycles. An analytical comparison of the theoretical COP's and other practical advantages of several different twophase ejector refrigeration cycles is presented. An ejector cycle was constructed in which the pressure lift provided by the ejector was utilized in order to provide multiple evaporation temperatures. Multiple evaporators provide the potential for reduced exergetic losses between refrigerant and a single air stream as well as the possibility of cooling multiple air streams, which can be beneficial in some applications. Experimental results comparing the performance of the two fluids on the cycles are presented.
Lawrence, NealElbel, Stefan
Thermophysical Properties of the Natural Environment, Gases, Liquids, and SolidsAIR1168/9 (Historical)6/22/2004
This AIR is arranged in the following four sections: 2A - Properties of the Natural Environment 2B - Properties of Gases 2C - Properties of Liquids 2D - Properties of Solids A summary of each section is given below. Section 2A - This section includes currently applicable earth atmosphere standards (Refs. 101 and 103) and data on the near-Earth environment. Limited data on Mars and Venus reflected solar and planetary-emitted radiation and on micrometeorite data are also included. For space vehicle applications, environmental models are of two general types: orbital and reentry. For orbital models, variable properties such as time and solar flux are usually averaged. Reentry atmospheres are chiefly a function of location and altitude, and selection may be based on reentry location. Variation with latitude is an important local effect (Ref. 106). The electromagnetic solar radiation data in this section are for altitudes above the Earth’s atmosphere. The amount of radiation energy below 0.22μ (Fig. 2A-10) is small and has little effect on vehicle thermal balance. It is primarily of interest because of degradation effects on thermal control coatings. Planetary albedo (fraction of solar radiation which is reflected) varies strongly with the local solar angle of incidence, surface characteristics, and existence of planetary atmosphere (particularly the extent of cloud cover; see Ref. 121). The following ranges may be used as a guide: (1) Earth, 0.33-0.39 (frequently considered as uniform diffuse radiation, average value in low orbits is 0.36). (2) Venus, 0.55-0.90 (0.76 at 5500Ǻ). (3) Mars, 0.3 at 7000Ǻ; 0.04 below 4500Ǻ. Planetary thermal emission is predominantly infrared. Emission from the atmosphere occurs only at wavelengths at which the atmosphere absorbs; for wavelengths where the atmospheric gas is transparent, the emission comes from the planetary surface. An average value of 15% of solar flux is frequently used for low Earth orbits. The opaque atmosphere of Venus prevents long wave surface radiation from emerging. Thermal emission in the 8-13μ range comes from the upper atmosphere, which has an emitting temperature of 230K. The mean Mars surface temperature range is 200-300K, and these values bracket the seasonal, diurnal, and latitudinal variations (Ref. 118). Considerable uncertainty still exists on meteorite data (Refs. 111-113). Ref. 114 is a more recent attempt to provide an interim standard. Data on space environments can be used only as a guide, since they are subject to rapid obsolescence as additional information from interplanetary probe experiments becomes available. Sections 2B, 2C, and 2D - The data in these sections are presented primarily in graphical form. The data were compiled by Professor Harold Sogin, circa 1966, and represent a selection of the then best currently available sources. The following properties are listed as applicable to the materials listed alphabetically in the index, Par. 7. Consult specific material for desired properties. Materials are indexed by figure number and table number. Section 2E - Thermodynamic Characteristics of Working Fluids and Section 2F - Properties of Heat Transfer Fluids are in AIR 1168/10.
AC-9 Aircraft Environmental Systems Committee
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 71