Browse Topic: Aluminum

Items (991)
This specification covers an aircraft quality, low alloy steel in the form of sheet, strip, and plate.
AMS E Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Committee
This specification covers an aircraft-quality, low-alloy steel in the form of round, non-welded tubing free from OD surface seams.
AMS E Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Committee
This specification covers an aircraft-quality, low-alloy steel in the form of welded tubing.
AMS E Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Committee
This specification covers an aircraft quality, low alloy steel in the form of sheet, strip, and plate.
AMS E Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Committee
This specification covers an aircraft-quality, low-alloy steel in the form of sheet, strip, and plate.
AMS E Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Committee
This specification covers an aircraft-quality, low-alloy steel in the form of bars, forgings, mechanical tubing, and forging stock.
AMS E Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Committee
This specification covers a carbon steel in the form of bars up through 3.000 inches (76.2 mm), forgings, and forging stock.
AMS E Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Committee
This specification covers an aluminum alloy in the form of plate 0.750 to 1.500 inch, incl ( 19.05 to 38.10 mm, incl) in thickness (see 8.5).
AMS D Nonferrous Alloys Committee
This specification covers a magnesium alloy in the form of sheet and plate.
AMS D Nonferrous Alloys Committee
This specification covers an aluminum alloy in the form of sheet 0.009 to 0.126 inch (0.23 to 3.20 mm) inclusive, in nominal thickness, alclad.
AMS D Nonferrous Alloys Committee
This specification covers an aluminum alloy in the form of extruded bars, rods, wire, profiles, and tubing.
AMS D Nonferrous Alloys Committee
This specification covers an aluminum alloy in the form of plate 0.500 to 1.500 inch, incl (12.70 to 38.10 mm, incl) in thickness (see 8.4).
AMS D Nonferrous Alloys Committee
With performance advances proposed for the Future Vertical Lift suite of aircraft and advancements in the electronic battlefield, it is imperative that advanced materials and concepts be included in the vehicle designs to meet the aggressive weight reduction objectives, structural requirements, and operational environment capabilities. Integrating electromagnetic (EM) shielding during the design process offers an opportunity to make progress towards the performance goals. To this end, efforts must be made to minimize the impact of this shielding to platform weight and structural performance. This article presents work to develop a hybrid multifunctional composite material technology that incorporates copper mesh into a carbon fiber and thermoplastic matrix structural composite material to achieve required levels of EM shielding and high levels of structural efficiency while reducing the overall weight of the system. This article focuses on the design of a representative helicopter tailcone as means of illustrating expected improvements in weight and manufacturing cost. Baselines that include structure fabricated from aluminum and thermoset composite are established and predicted improvements quantified.
Haynes, RobertLuzetsky, HarryPhifer, Ellen
This study investigates Reynolds number effects on rotor wake vortex development using a hyperbaric rotor facility capable of pressurizing air up to 100 bar. Background-oriented schlieren (BOS) and hot-wire anemometry (HWA) were applied to characterize vortex trajectories, core growth, and circumferential velocity distribution. BOS measurements revealed consistent blade-to-blade trajectory deviations and vortex pairing across all operating conditions, despite that the investigated three-bladed rotor was milled from a single piece of aluminum, ensuring precise manufacturing and a highly symmetric geometry. A statistical scheme was developed to analyze the radial structure of fluctuating tip vortices, which traverse the pointwise fiber-film sensor in a fixed position. With increasing vortex Reynolds number, the tip vortices are more compact with a reduction in core growth. The circulation in the vortices grows with the vortex radial coordinate, and converges at a radial position basically independent of the vortex core size. Observed asymmetries in young vortices at low Reynolds numbers indicate enhanced roll-up dynamics. The results demonstrate the facility’s ability to isolate Reynolds number effects in rotor wake dynamics.
Bartzsch, Hauke T.Wolf, C. ChristianGalli, EricaRaffel, MarkusBraune, MarcLöhr, Markus
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
This specification covers an aircraft-quality, low-alloy steel in the form of bars, forgings, mechanical tubing, and forging stock.
AMS E Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Committee
This specification covers an aircraft-quality, low-alloy steel in the form of bars, forgings, mechanical tubing, and forging stock.
AMS E Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Committee
Supplementary to the heat or cast analysis, a product analysis may be made on steel in the semifinished or finished form. For definitions and methods of sampling steel for product chemical analysis, refer to SAE J408. A product analysis is a chemical analysis of the semifinished or finished steel to determine conformance to the specification requirements. The range of the specified chemical composition is normally expanded to take into account deviations associated with analytical reproducibility and the heterogeneity of the steel. Individual determinations may vary from the specified heat or cast analysis ranges or limits to the extent shown in Tables 1 through 5. The several determinations of any element in a heat or cast may not vary both above and below the specified range except for lead. Tables 1 through 5 provide permissible limits for various steel forms and composition types. For rephosphorized and resulfurized steels, the product analysis tolerance limits are not applicable to phosphorus and sulfur because of the degree to which these elements segregate. Boron is not subject to product analysis tolerances.
Metals Technical Committee
This specification covers one type of aluminum bronze in the form of bars, rods, forgings, and forging stock.
AMS D Nonferrous Alloys Committee
ABSTRACT
Lua, JimKaruppiah,  AnandLi,  PeipeiStuebner,  MichaelYan, JinhuiZhao,  Ze
This specification covers an aluminum alloy in the form of die forgings up to 6 inches in thickness and forging stock of any size ordered to inch/pound units (see 8.8).
AMS D Nonferrous Alloys Committee
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
This specification covers an aircraft-quality, low-alloy steel in the form of bars, forgings, and forging stock.
AMS E Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Committee
This specification covers an aircraft-quality, low-alloy steel in the form of sheet, strip, and plate.
AMS E Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Committee
This specification covers an aluminum bronze alloy in the form of bars, rods, forgings, and forging stock.
AMS D Nonferrous Alloys Committee
This list of terms, with accompanying photomicrographs where appropriate, is intended as a guide for use in the preparation of material specifications.
AMS G Titanium and Refractory Metals Committee
This specification covers an aircraft-quality, low-alloy steel in the form of bars, forgings, flash welded rings, and stock for forging or flash welded rings.
AMS E Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Committee
This specification covers an aluminum alloy in the form of extruded bars, rods, and profiles (shapes) produced with nominal thickness up to 3.000 inch (76.20 mm), inclusive, and having a cross sectional area of 42 square inches (271 square centimeters) maximum and a circumscribing circle diameter (circle size) of 15 inches (38 cm) maximum (see 8.9). See 8.3 for definition of circumscribing circle size.
AMS D Nonferrous Alloys Committee
This specification covers an aircraft-quality, low-alloy steel in the form of heat treated bars and forgings.
AMS E Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Committee
Study on the Quantitative Relationship between Static Stiffness and Modal Parameters of an Aluminum Space Frame10-04-02-00071/27/2020
In this article, the quantitative relationship between the static stiffness, lightweight factor, and modal parameters of an aluminum space frame was investigated. Modal theory calculation and finite element method were employed in the analysis. Fifty modal parameters were extracted from the finite element model of the frame to calculate the bending stiffness, torsional stiffness, and lightweight factor of the frame. The deviations of the bending stiffness, torsional stiffness, and lightweight factor obtained from the modal theory and the finite element theory were found to be 0.91%, 1.72%, and 1.71%, respectively. It indicates that these two methods have similar accuracy. It was confirmed that the sum of each order modal compliance could be used to calculate the static compliance of the aluminum space frame. The first-order bending mode was found to be the corresponding mode order, which made the largest contribution to the bending stiffness. This method is also applicable for identifying the first-order torsional mode. The results also show that such a modal identification method can avoid effectively the interference of local mode on the major body mode identification. The results obtained from finite element analysis and modal theory method were both verified by the experimental testing results. It proved that both of these two methods were effective in calculating the bending stiffness, torsional stiffness, and lightweight factor. As a comparison, the modal theory showed higher accuracy with lower deviation in the calculated parameters to the experimentally measured ones. The modal theory results of the bending stiffness, torsional stiffness, and lightweight factor were closer to the experimental results with deviations of 4.64%, 3.61%, and 3.64%, while they are 5.82%, 5.53%, and 5.29% for the finite element method, respectively. This article supplies important guidance for the lightweight design and target setting of aluminum space frames in the concept stage.
Wang, ZhenhuXia, ErliChen, ZimingXue, ZhigangLi, Luoxing
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 991