Browse Topic: Seats and seating
Helicopter aircrew are exposed to high levels of whole-body vibration (WBV) in fight operations, which may degrade their ride comfort and performance in the short-term, and contribute to some health issues in the long-term. This paper presents the latest development and flight test demonstration results of an active seat mount system that is designed to reduce helicopter aircrew WBV levels through active cancellation of the N/rev vibration peaks related to the helicopter main rotor speed. A prototype airworthy hardware of the active seat mount system has been developed based on previous bench-top-test designs to meet airframe integrity requirements for installation and flight testing on the Bell-412 helicopter. Extensive experimental results on human occupants using a shaker table facility and flight demonstrations on the NRC Bell-412 helicopter in representative flight conditions are presented and discussed. The active seat mount system has achieved significant reduction to the occupant WBV levels at the bottom seat cushion interface per ISO2631/MIL-STD-1472G metrics, and also showed effective mitigation to the occupant head vibrations. These investigations demonstrate that the active seat mount technology is a feasible solution for helicopter aircrew WBV mitigation.
This paper describes development and testing of a low-cost device mounted on in the pilot seat of a rotorcraft simulator with the aim of improving the perceived realism of the flight. The device acting vertically from the bottom of the seat is used to communicate changes of acceleration in the vertical direction corresponding to heave movement of the simulated aircraft. A bespoke flight simulator system was developed, featuring modular design and virtual reality (VR) visualisation to enable comparative testing with a full motion system. Objective analyses have shown similarities between the two motion cueing configurations when contrasted with only using visual cues.
The Advanced Helicopter Seating System (AHSS) was started as an effort to evaluate and improve the current state of military rotorcraft seating. The overall goal of the program has been to improve pilot ergonomics and safety through the integration of advanced energy absorption and vibration reduction mechanisms as well as a broad approach to system integration based around updated occupant anthropometrics. An entirely new seating solution has been developed, with intent to integrate with the AH-64 Apache platform for demonstration purposes. The AH-64 development culminated with a series of static tests and dynamic test events to measure the effectiveness of the safety systems integrated on the seat as compared to the legacy AH-64 seating system. While lumbar load data and seat stroke data was obtained, issues with the anthropomorphic test device (ATD) configuration at the 95th male configuration caused some data to be suspect, and premature failure of several components also caused loss of capturing accurate data. Lessons learned are documented in the conclusions. Data and lessons learned from this effort are being used to support a follow-on effort to develop a pilot seat for the UH-60 Black Hawk Platform.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT The BAE Systems legacy UH-60A/L Black Hawk Crew Seat has been in serial production for almost 40 years, and has garnered a reputation for providing a high degree of crash safety to its occupants. The seat has been dynamically tested over 150 times, providing a wealth of test data that are summarized in this paper. This paper also presents a review of data from actual UH-60A/L crashes that verifies the seat's excellent performance with regards to minimizing occupant compressive spinal injuries. In addition, this paper presents a compilation of test data containing ATD lumbar-load readings. The dynamic test results are then compared to the lumbar-load limits specified in JSSG-2010-7 and the more recent Full Spectrum Crashworthiness (FSC) Criteria for Rotorcraft. This comparison shows that the seat most likely would not have passed the FSC criteria, which indicates that either the FSC lumbar-load limits are set too low, or that the dynamic test pulses do not replicate the actual crash environment. The JSSG criteria were found to be a better predictor of the seat's actual crash performance.
ABSTRACT During the winter of 2018, a series of vertical tests was conducted on three sizes of Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs) for the evaluation of their vertical loading response. The three sizes of ATDs represented a 5th percentile female, a 50th percentile male, and a 95th percentile male. There were two variations of the 50th percentile male as defined in 49 CFR Part 572: a Hybrid II and an FAA Hybrid III. Tests were conducted on a drop tower located at NASA Langley Research Center's (LaRC) Landing and Impact Research (LandIR) Facility. The ATDs were seated on 14 CFR § 25.562 certified seats, in either a triple (window, middle and aisle) or a double (window and aisle) seat configuration, with seat leg spacing replicating a Fokker F28 MK-1000 aircraft. The seat and ATDs were attached to a drop plate on the tower, which was lifted to a height of 14 ft. The system was dropped onto different sections of crushable foam wedges to achieve multiple input deceleration environments. The purpose of the tests was to evaluate the differences in lumbar response, to examine scaling characteristics from sizing factors in the ATDs, and also to compare the results to computer simulation efforts. Results will be presented and comparisons will be discussed.
ABSTRACT The Air Force Research Laboratory Aircrew Biodynamics and Protection Group of the Applied Neuroscience Branch (711HPW/RHCPT) conducted a dynamic impact comparative test program of currently-fielded side facing troop seats to evaluate how effectively the seats protect occupants ranging from the 5th percentile female to the 98th percentile male during crash events. The test program consisted of impact testing stock H-60A/L, CV-22, and CH-53E seats and quantifying the safety effectiveness of each seat using recommended injury criteria from the Full Spectrum Crashworthiness (FSC) report and other historical criteria. The program demonstrates a methodology to quickly and inexpensively compare occupant protection across different designs and platforms. The program also identifies serious structural and functional deficiencies of several operational seats that correlate with rotorcraft mishap injury and mortality data.
ABSTRACT Flight testing has been performed on a Bell-205 helicopter to investigate aircrew whole-body vibration (WBV) exposure levels on a rag and tube Flight Engineer (FE) seat in accordance with ISO2631 and MIL-STD1472 standards. Results show that the helicopter cabin vibration is dominated by the N/rev harmonics of the two-bladed main rotor speed. The aircrew WBV levels vary significantly depending on the flight conditions; the highest WBV levels occur at high speed level flight conditions. With reference to the ISO2631 and MIL-STD-1472 guidelines, the aircrew WBV exposure level on the standard FE seat in the entire tested flight profile is qualitatively rated as "uncomfortable". Limiting the maximum duration of such missions to 1 hour would ensure compliance with the limit of ISO2631 vibration health and risk guideline "Caution Zone". It is also noted that the use of gunner seat insert cushion for combat missions can lead to a significant increase in the aircrew WBV levels. However, the use of selected carry-on cushion pads can provide an effective WBV mitigation to the aircrew in the majority of flight conditions. Further occupant WBV tests on a human rated mechanical shaker table also verified that selected carryon seat cushion pads are also effective in the mitigation of occupant WBV levels on the Bell-412 helicopter.
Dynamic impact tests were conducted to assess the effectiveness of the Visco-Elastic Polyurethane (VEPU) memory foam seat cushions in mitigating impact to the occupant during an aircraft crash. A FAA specification Hybrid III crash dummy and seats with and without a stroke energy absorbing mechanism were used in the tests. Polyurethane foam (PU) cushions were also tested for comparison. The results with the rigid seat indicated that with 8.3 m/s impact, lumbar spine injury would occur. VEPU cushions reduced the lumbar force by up to 34%. With an impact speed of 6m/s, a VEPU cushion mitigated the impact to the tolerable level, whilst injury would still occur with the PU cushions. The results with the energy absorbing seats showed that with 8.3 m/s impact speed, the seat with over 125 mm (5 inch) stroke length is able to reduce the impact load below the injury threshold. A relatively softer VEPU cushion reduced the lumbar force by over 15% compared with the PU cushions. With a stoke length of 75 mm (3 inch), bottom-out occurred and occupant lumbar spine injury would occur. A relatively higher stiffness VEPU cushion reduced lumbar force by around 20%.
There is no requirement for full-scale testing of either civil or military rotorcraft to certify a design as safe or crashworthy. The Federal Aviation Administration has a number of standards and regulations that are designed to protect occupants in the event of a crash. These standards focus primarily on frontal and vertical impact protection of the occupant seating system and those items in the cabin interior that surround the occupant. With the adoption of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 29.562, as well as the corresponding portions of 14 CFR 23.562, 25.562, and 27.562, a seating system is comprised of the seat, all attachment hardware, and the restraint system. In this methodology, the attachments and the restraint are approved for use at the same time as the seat itself. One restraint cannot be readily swapped out for another restraint and any repairs of the restraint itself must return it back to its original specifications. Inherent material properties of common webbing materials may affect the dynamic response of the seat system. To determine how differences in elongation properties affect seat dynamic response, a test program using a rigid seat setup in different configurations with different webbing materials was conducted by the FAA. The selected configurations represented seats commonly in use. Both new and newly repaired belts were acquired for this study. As part of this test program, a second phase was conducted to investigate the effects of belt stiffness. Original belt webbing material and several replacement webbing material candidates were statically tested to determine their elongation properties. These belts were then subjected to the same test setup as in phase 1; however, unlike phase 1, only one seating configuration was tested. All these different belts were then subjected to dynamic impact tests using a rigid seat and the sled test pulse from Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations 25.562. No structural failures occurred in any of the tests. A trend was noted that higher belt stiffness resulted in less occupant excursion and higher belt loads. It was also noted that static belt stiffness can be used to characterize relative belt performance in dynamic tests. These data can be used to develop general guidelines on allowable webbing changes for previously approved seat belts.
The next generation smart crashworthy crew seats will need to include design features that provide an enhanced level of crash safety while reducing the crew discomfort during long military missions. This paper presents the results from the Active Crash Protection Systems Enhancements II Program jointly funded by the U.S. Army Aviation Development Directorate - Aviation Applied Technology Directorate (ADD-AATD) and The Boeing Company under a Technology Investment Agreement. During this program a prototype crew seat design concept with actively-controlled seat energy absorbers was developed and integrated with an aircraft active crash protection system. The actively-controlled seat energy absorber technology developed enables automatic adjustment of the stroking load of the energy absorbers based on the occupant weight, available seat stroke, and the predicted crash impact conditions in order to provide an increased level of crash safety to the crew. The paper also includes results and recommendations from a crew seat ergonomic design study conducted to reduce crew discomfort during long missions.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has standards and regulations that are designed to protect aircraft occupants in the event of a crash. These standards focus primarily on horizontal and vertical impact protection, and measure the dynamic performance of the seating system and occupant restraints. Currently no requirement for full-scale crashworthiness testing exists due to the cost prohibitive nature of conducting such a test. The requirements were developed through review of research, existing requirements, modeling and simulation, and accident analysis. A drop of a Transport Rotorcraft Airframe Crash Testbed (TRACT), CH-46 airframe, at the National Aeronautics and Space Agency's Langley Research Center Landing and Impact Facility, provided an opportunity to investigate the performance of an airframe in a simulated crash condition. This provided full scale data on the performance of previously approved transport category aircraft seating systems. Passenger seats that were previously certified to 14 CFR § 25.562 aviation regulations with a 49 CFR § 572 50% Hybrid II Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD) were included in the testing. It was expected that the real crash pulse measured at the floor, would differ from the certification tests and the performance of the seats would as well. The ATDs used in the crash test included the 50% Hybrid II, a 50% FAA Hybrid III, 5% Hybrid III and a 95% Hybrid III. Injuries in the spinal column are of concern, so lumbar loads were collected for all ATDs, in addition to head, chest and pelvis accelerations. The Part 25 Passenger seats remained attached to the floor structure; however the experimental sub floor structure failed for the forward occupants. The restraint system held the occupants in place, however the compressive lumbar loads measured were significantly higher than those seen in typical certification tests, and exceeded the regulatory limit of 1500 lb. Typical certification tests primarily use the 50% Hybrid II or an equivalent, which is the FAA Hybrid III. The main performance requirement during a vertical test is the compressive lumbar loads, but structural integrity is also evaluated. This testing demonstrated that seats dynamically qualified for lower impact severities (14 G) were able to maintain structural integrity but were not able to control spinal injury risk at this load level.
Items per page:
50
1 – 50 of 277