Browse Topic: Neck

Items (186)
Head Support Concept to Mitigate Neck Injury for Children Installed Forward Facing in Vehicles2019-36-01061/13/2020
The slender neck of a 3-year-old child can be serious injured or even lead to child’s death when loaded under frontal impact by the proportionately larger and heavier head. Accordingly with medical recommendations based on latest studies, a 3-year-old child is safer when installed in a rear-facing child seat, but this configuration is not feasible for some vehicles with limited rear space such as superminis, small MPVs and pick-ups when front seats are occupied. This study aims to explore the potential of neck tension (Fz) reduction in 3-year-old dummy installed forward-facing when subjected to three head static restraints (head strap, head support, cervical collar) as well as an overhead shield car seat in order to identify solutions for a device to avoid or mitigate neck injuries. To simulate frontal impacts, a 3-year-old dummy from Q series was installed on a reinforced vehicle body fixed on a sled test equipment where the United Nations R129 pulse was applied. Both head strap and head support were not able to reduce neck tension due to the high Q3 dummy’s torso displacement up to the child seat straps and were broken or released from child seat prior restraining head movement. Furthermore, parents would not be motivated to install head restraints daily because each device requires a specific adjustment for each child or journey. The overhead shield car seat was not able to reduce neck tension because the position of shield allows a large head displacement. The cervical collar offered a good resistance to the neck moment, reducing the head angular velocity and consequently reducing neck tension (Fz). This concept can be easily developed as a shoulder strap positioner requiring only a single action when installing the child and meeting United Nations R129 criteria to remove the child before buckle releasing.
Ribeiro, Rodrigo da SilvaDe Arruda, Antonio Celso Fonseca
Influence of DISH, Ankylosis, Spondylosis and Osteophytes on Serious-to-Fatal Spinal Fractures and Cord Injury in Rear Impacts2019-01-10284/2/2019
Seats have become stronger over the past two decades and remain more upright in rear impacts. While head restraints are higher and more forward providing support for the head and neck, serious-to-fatal injuries to the thoracic and cervical spine have been seen in occupants with spinal disorders, such as DISH (diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis), ankylosis, spondylosis and/or osteophytes that ossify the joints in the spine. This case study addresses the influence of spinal disorders on fracture-dislocation and spinal cord injury in rear impacts with relatively upright seats. Nineteen field accidents were investigated where serious-to-fatal injuries of the thoracic and cervical spine occurred with the seat remaining upright or slightly reclined. The occupants were lap-shoulder belted, some with belt pretensioning and cinching latch plate. The occupants were older and had pre-existing disorders of the spine, including DISH, ankylosis, spondylosis and/or osteophytes that ossify the spinal joints. The crashes were summarized and the mechanism for injury was analyzed. The 19 cases involved fracture-dislocation and spinal cord injury at areas of the spine where DISH, ankylosis, spondylosis and/or osteophytes ossified the intervertebral soft tissues causing stiff and brittle joints that were vulnerable to fracture-dislocation by straightening of the spine. Published sled tests at 40 km/h (25 mph) with the 50th Hybrid III showed that peak chest acceleration was 13.5 ± 2.4 g (n=7) and head acceleration was 26.0 ± 12.0 g (n=8). Sled testing at 16 km/h (10 mph) with the BioRID IIg involved T1 x-accelerations of 12.6 ± 2.4 g (n=12) and head x-accelerations of 10.1 ± 0.2 g (n=12). These levels of acceleration are sufficient to fracture the calcified spine of the older occupants without ramping or moving off the support from the seatback and head restraint. A new injury mechanism for spinal fracture-dislocation is described in older occupants with spinal disorders. The occupant remains supported by the relatively upright seatback and high and forward head restraint. The accelerations that bring the occupant up to the delta V are sufficient to fracture-dislocate the calcified spine that tries to straighten in the crash.
Viano, DavidParenteau, ChantalWhite, Samuel
Head and Neck Loading Conditions over a Decade of IIHS Rear Impact Seat Testing2019-01-12274/2/2019
Rear-end impacts are the most common crash scenario in the United States. Although automated vehicle (AV) technologies, such as frontal crash warning (FCW) and automatic emergency braking (AEB), are mitigating and preventing rear-end impacts, the technology is only gradually being introduced and currently has only limited effectiveness. Accordingly, there is a need to evaluate the current state of passive safety technologies, including the performance of seatbacks and head restraints. The objective of this study was to examine trends in head and neck loading during rear impact testing in new vehicle models over the prior decade. Data from 601 simulated rear impact sled tests (model years 2004 to 2018) conducted as a part of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) Vehicle Seat/Head Restraint Evaluation Protocol were obtained. This dynamic evaluation involves a simulated rear-end crash using a Biofidelic Rear Impact (BioRID IIg) ATD positioned in the seat attached to a crash simulation sled and accelerated to represent a rear crash with a delta-V of approximately 15.6 kph (15.6 ± 0.26 kph). Head and neck injury metrics were calculated for all tests to evaluate trends in the test ATD responses across model years. Reductions in HIC 15, Nij, and upper neck tensile forces were observed across all model years. Nkm, upper neck flexion moments, extension moments, and shear forces were found to show little or no change by model year. Reductions in time to initial contact with the head restraint were observed and likely contributed to reduced head accelerations and neck tensile forces. Given the anticipated persistence of rear-end impacts and potential changes to the vehicle interior layout with improving AV technology, the data should be considered by designers, researchers, and evaluators looking to project future crash and injury rates in rear-end impacts.
Scanlon, John M.Isaacs, JessicaGarman, Christina
Occupant Kinematics and Loading in Low Speed Lateral Impacts2019-01-10274/2/2019
Instrumented human subject and anthropomorphic test device (ATD) responses to low speed lateral impacts were investigated. A series of 12 lateral collisions at various impact angles were conducted, 6 near-side and 6 far-side, with each test using an ATD and one human subject. Two restrained female subjects were utilized, with one positioned in the driver seat and one in the left rear seat. Each subject was exposed to 3 near-side and 3 far-side impacts. The restrained ATD was utilized in both the driver and left rear seats, undergoing 3 near-side and 3 far-side impacts in each position. The vehicle center of gravity (CG) change in velocity (delta-V) ranged from 5.5 to 9.4 km/h (3.4 to 5.8 mph). Video analysis was used for quantification and comparison of the human and ATD motions and interactions with interior vehicle structures. Human head, thorax, and low back accelerations were analyzed. Peak human subject head resultant accelerations ranged from 0.9 to 36.8 g’s. Peak human subject thorax and low back lateral accelerations ranged from 1.0 to 17.1 g’s and 1.3 to 12.7 g’s, respectively. The ATD was instrumented with various sensors, including a tri-axial head accelerometer and 6-axis load cells in the upper neck, lower neck, and lumbar spine. Peak ATD head resultant accelerations ranged from 3.6 to 33.5 g’s. Peak ATD upper and lower neck compression ranged from -47.4 to -991.5 N and -52.1 to -740.6 N, respectively. Peak ATD lumbar compression ranged from -72.3 to -402.1 N. Cervical and lumbar shear loading and moments are also reported.
Furbish, ChristopherWelcher, JudsonBrink, JustinJones, BrianSwinford, ScottAnderson, Robert
Development of Component Level Transfer Equations of Simplified Human and ATD Occupant Models09-06-01-00056/5/2018
Safety systems have historically been evaluated with anthropomorphic test devices for research, development, or regulatory concerns. Human body models are another avenue for use in the investigation of occupant safety. In this study, transfer equations are developed to quantify the response of a human model (Global Human Body Models Consortium average male simplified model) and dummy model (Hybrid-III) in equivalent environments. Environments were selected based on certification test setups used for the Hybrid III ATD as well as a basic frontal sled environment. The tests include a head drop, neck flexion/extension, and chest and knee impacts. Furthermore, models were positioned within a simplified occupant interior for sled tests. In all, 30 matched pair simulations were run, 60 in total. Peak metrics between human and anthropomorphic test device models showed strong linear correlation in component testing however, as the complexity of the simulations increased, agreement tended to decrease. Kinematic data are also presented and they trend similarly between human and anthropomorphic test device models however they exhibit different timing and peaks. Within the range tested, the developed transfer equations can be used to estimate performance of one model if data from the other is available. Furthermore, the evaluation of risk for these equivalent impacts is provided for HIC-15, max chest deflections and femur forces aggregated across all tests. Over the range tested, equivalent impacts result in roughly equivalent risk levels with the exception of the femur, which resulted in higher forces in the Hybrid III and thus predicted higher risk.
Guleyupoglu, BerkanKoya, BharathGayzik, Francis Scott
Estimation of Injury Risk of the Cervical Spine of Car Occupants after Emergency Braking2018-01-05414/3/2018
This study deals with the question whether or not a “braking with maximum deceleration” represents a specific physical load situation for the occupants of a car. For this purpose, a literature study was performed to determine the relevance of symptoms concerning whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) of car occupants who were involved in traffic accidents with low accident severity. Additionally, test drives with full braking cars were conducted to determine the load situation of the neck for human test persons. Dummies were used too, which were equipped with measuring components at the head and thorax to identify the effective acceleration/deceleration and to compare these values to scientific approved characteristic deceleration values and to the existing neck injury criteria. Finally, the likelihood of occurrence of symptoms in terms of a neck injury was evaluated from the medical and biomechanical point of view. The study shows that there is basically no risk for the occurrence of neck injuries and neck pain (whiplash disorders) for car occupants who experienced a full braking maneuver. This applies for the specific individual measured data of the test subjects compared to the known maximum load from the literature. But the authors of the study have to point out that special individual psychological and physiological frame conditions can lead to symptoms in terms of minor whiplash associated disorders like muscle tension symptoms.
Otte, DietmarFacius lng, ThorstenJohannsen, HeikoHüfner, Tobias
Using Shoulder Bolster and Knee Bolster to Achieve Protection Effect Comparable to Seatbelt and Airbag2018-01-11704/3/2018
Seatbelt and airbags provide effective occupant restraint, but are also potential to induce intrusive deformation and submarining injuries in motor vehicle crashes. To address these issues, this study puts forward a new restraint concept that applies restraint loads on shoulders and knees/femurs, i.e., the sturdiest regions of human body, via a combined use of shoulder bolster and knee bolster based on biomechanical computational analysis. The load characteristics of the two bolsters were optimized to obtain protection effectiveness superior to conventional use of seatbelt and airbag. Occupant kinematics and kinetics were taken into account, including the excursions of head, shoulders and knees, the accelerations of head and chest, and the compressions of thorax on several locations on the ribcage. The injury risk of rib fractures was monitored based on the strain levels of ribcage. Results show that applying adaptive restraint loads on the sturdy regions of human body using shoulder bolster and knee bolster can ensure reasonable kinematical motion and acceptable injury levels of occupant, and can also avoid intrusive deformations in thorax and abdomen as well as airbag hazards. The protection effect of shoulder bolster and knee bolster is comparable or superior to that of using seatbelt and airbag. To achieve a balance of comfort and safety in autonomous driving environment, the system will be activated only when collision is sensed unavoidable.
Huang, YuanZhou, QingJi, PeijunNie, Bingbing
Potential Effects of Friction on Injury Measures Computed in Aircraft Seat HIC Analysis Testing2017-01-20549/19/2017
Aircraft seating systems are evaluated utilizing a variety of impact conditions and select injury measures. Injury measures like the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) are evaluated under standardized conditions using anthropomorphic test devices such as those outlined in 14 CFR part 25. An example test involves decelerating one or more rows of seats and allowing a lap-belted ATD to engage components in front of it, which typically include the seatback and its integrated features. Examples of head contact surfaces include video monitors, various plastic and composite fascia, and a wide range of seat back materials. The HIC, and other injury measures such as Nij, can be calculated during such impacts. It has been shown in other safety applications that the friction between a headform and contact surface can affect the test results. A series of finite element simulations of a frontal deceleration pulse with a generalized aircraft seat was performed to determine the variation in HIC and Nij observed based on various friction characteristics between the ATD and select seat components. The results indicate that the level of friction on the test device headform can influence the ability to pass the HIC analysis test. Of particular interest is the change in response due to the use of friction characteristics representative of human skin compared with ATD skin.
Friedman, KMattos, GBui, KHutchinson, JJafri, APaver, J
ABSTRACT Given the prevalence and severity of neck pain among helicopter pilots, the effects of helicopter whole body vibration (WBV) and pilot head-supported mass (HSM) on neck muscle strain and fatigue need to be understood to establish effective mitigating solutions and/or countermeasure protocols. The present study provides a preliminary assessment of pilot head and neck responses under different WBV conditions (i.e. Engines Off, Ground Idle, Hover, and Cruise) and HSM conditions (i.e. Helmet-only, Helmet+NVG) during flight operations on a Bell 412 helicopter. For both pilots, average neck electromyography (EMG) amplitudes were highest during the maximum WBV condition (Cruise) and the maximum HSM condition (Helmet+NVG). This indicates that helicopter WBV and HSM conditions jointly contribute to higher neck muscle loading, which may coincide with elevated neck muscle discomfort, strain, and fatigue. Therefore, effective mitigating solutions (e.g. vibration exposure limits, operational guidelines) must account for the combined effects of WBV and HSM to reduce or prevent neck pain among helicopter pilots.
Law, AndrewE., HeatherKeillor, JocelynWickramasinghe, Viresh
Small Occupant Neck Injury Biomechanics in Frontal Crash: A Study to Address the Variation in Restraint Performance with a Conventional 3-Point Single Loop Belt System2017-26-00031/10/2017
The seatbelt is the primary restraint device that increases the level of occupant protection in a frontal crash. The belt performance is enhanced by the supplemental restraint provided by the airbag; seat and knee bolster working in combination with this primary restraining device. Small occupants are vulnerable to upper neck injuries when seated very close to the steering wheel. A lot of research and data availability for this situation ultimately led to the development of countermeasures capable of reducing upper neck loading. However, no data or research is available on the lower neck dynamic response of a small occupant primarily a 5th percentile female seated away from the steering wheel. MADYMO (Mathematical Dynamic Modeling), a biodynamic code is employed to validate a standard NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) frontal impact rigid barrier test with a 5th percentile ATD (Anthropomorphic Test Device) in the driver position. This validated model is utilized to understand the effect of the chest to steering wheel distance on the lower neck flexion values. This study demonstrates that with the conventional seatbelt system the occupant protection performance changes with a change in the chest to steering distance. Sensitivity analysis is employed to identify the most significant factor dictating the small occupant’s lower neck biomechanics. The study shows that with an increase in distance between the chest to steering wheel, the lower neck flexion moment increase for a 5th percentile female when restrained by a conventional single loop seatbelt system. Analytical method in conjunction with computational simulations is used to explain the data trend.
Thorbole, Chandrashekhar
The second of two full-scale crash tests of USMC CH-46 helicopter airframes was conducted at NASA-Langley Research Center. One of the internal experiments was an expanded assessment of a mobile aircrew restraint system (MARS) coupled with the Aircrew Endurance vest. Two Hybrid III Pedestrian Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs) were positioned in a standing position, just aft of the crew door. On the port side, the ATD was positioned substantially close to structure on the aft side of the cockpit bulkhead with the objective to determine if the MARS could prevent contact between the ATD and structure. On the starboard side, the ATD was positioned underneath and inboard of the respective MARS reel and oriented to be aft-facing. The objective of both configurations was to assess the ability of the MARS to restrain occupants in challenging conditions and to limit injury potential. For the conditions evaluated, both MARS performed better than the gunner's belt results of the first CH-46 airframe crash test (Reference 1). This second crash test did illuminate a neck injury criterion exceedance for the port ATD that is likely caused by a non-standard helmet attachment to the ATD, but should be further investigated in a laboratory.
Bark, Lindley
A Proposal of Dummy Neck Certification Test2016-01-04054/5/2016
Crash Test Dummies are the very important tools to evaluate the vehicle safety performance. In order to ensure the dummy performance during the crash tests, the dummy components need to be certificated. In the neck certification procedure, the head angle is the most important parameter, which is the head rotation respect to the neck base. To get the head angle, couples of rotary potentiometers should be mounted either on the calibration fixture or on the dummy head. The rotation is then calculated from those potentiometer readings. There are two potentiometers mounted in the Hybrid III family dummies, while three potentiometers mounted in ES2, ES-2re, SID-IIs, and WorldSid 50th dummies. In the certification, maximum head angle and time occurred should be within certain ranges in the Hybrid III family dummies while for the ES2 and WorldSid 50th dummies, not only the maximum head angle, but also the other angles and their timings should meet the requirements. It is very difficult to get all of them in the test corridors, sometimes needs couple of testing days. In many cases the maximum head angle is in the corridor while the others are not. The purpose of mounting rotary potentiometers is to obtain the head angle and it is not necessary to bring all the angles into the specifications. In this paper the dummy neck certification procedures and head angle calculation are discussed. A proposal is made for the ES2 and WorldSid 50th dummies to remove the individual maximum angles and remain the head angle in the specification.
Wei, FupinXu, LiCao, ChenZhao, Youmei
Comparison of ATD to PMHS Response in the Under-Body Blast Environment2015-22-001711/9/2015
A blast buck (Accelerative Loading Fixture, or ALF) was developed for studying underbody blast events in a laboratory-like setting. It was designed to provide a high-magnitude, high-rate, vertical loading environment for cadaver and dummy testing. It consists of a platform with a reinforcing cage that supports adjustable-height rigid seats for two crew positions. The platform has a heavy frame with a deformable floor insert. Fourteen tests were conducted using fourteen PMHS (post mortem human surrogates) and the Hybrid III ATD (Anthropomorphic Test Device). Tests were conducted at two charge levels: enhanced and mild. The surrogates were tested with and without PPE (Personal Protective Equipment), and in two different postures: nominal (knee angle of 90°) and obtuse (knee angle of 120°). The ALF reproduces damage in the PMHS commensurate with injuries experienced in theater, with the most common damage being to the pelvis and ankle. Load is transmitted through the surrogates in a caudal-to-cranial sequential fashion. Damage to the PMHS lower extremities begins within 2 ms after the initiation of foot/floor motion. The Hybrid III cannot assume the posture of the PMHS in rigid seats and exhibits a stiffer overall response compared to the PMHS. The ATD does not mimic the kinematic response of the PMHS lower extremities. Further, the Hybrid III does not have the capability to predict the potential for injury in the high-rate, vertical loading environment. A new ATD dedicated to under-body blast is needed to assist in the effort to mitigate injuries sustained by the mounted soldier.
Danelson, Kerry A.Kemper, Andrew R.Mason, Matthew J.Tegtmeyer, MichaelSwiatkowski, Sean A.Bolte IV, John H.Hardy, Warren N.
ABSTRACT While night vision goggles (NVG) have become an essential part of rotorcraft night flight operations for the military, there has been an increase in the reports of neck strain and neck pain in flight crews using the equipment. The neck is required to support the weight of the NVG on the helmet and is constantly stabilizing the head to counteract the helicopter vibrations. The current flight tests examined the magnitude of vibrations at the pilot's head while tuning or slightly de-tuning the track-and-balance of the main rotor on the NRC Bell 412 as well as measuring the physiological response of the pilot to the resulting vibration levels. While the minimal detuning of the main rotor increased the vibration of the helicopter (by about 0.006g), the increase in vibration at the pilots head was substantial (a 0.01g increase). Physiological measures showed increased heart rate and decreased tactile sensitivity as the helicopter vibration increased. While it is likely that the increased vibration resulting from poor rotor track-and-balance increases the level of neck strain on pilots, further research is required to determine the magnitude of these effects and the maximum safe exposure level.
Craig, G.Wright-Beatty, HeatherAlexander, MarcKeillor, Jocelyn
Effects of Crash Pulse, Impact Angle, Occupant Size, Front Seat Location, and Restraint System on Rear Seat Occupant Protection2015-01-14534/14/2015
In this study, two sled series were conducted with a sled buck representing a compact vehicle. The first series of tests focused on the effects of crash pulse, impact angle, occupant size, and front seat location on rear seat occupant restraint with a generic rear-seat belt system without pre-tensioner or load limiter. The second series of tests focused on investigating the benefit of using advanced features for rear-seat occupant restraint in the most severe crash condition in the first sled series. The first series of tests include 16 test conditions with two impact angles (0° and 15°), two sled pulse (soft and severe), and four ATD sizes (HIII 6YO, HIII 5th female, HIII 95th male, and THOR-NT) with two ATDs in each test. The driver seat was located at the mid position, while the front passenger seat was positioned such that a constant distance between the ATD knee and the front seat is achieved. In all the tests, a generic rear-seat belt system without pre-tensioner, load limiter or dynamic locking tongue (DLT) was used. Test results from the first sled series showed that crash pulse and occupant size are the two dominating factors affecting the ATD kinematics and injury measurements, while impact angle and front-seat location are not statistically significant. Although no head-to-front-seat contact occurred in any of the tests, in general, the severe crash pulse would result in chest deflections over the injury criteria for adult ATDs with higher ATD excursions than for the soft crash pulse. These results are consistent to those from the field data in that chest injuries are the most common injuries in rear-seat adult occupants. The HIII 6YO ATD sustained submarining kinematics in all the tests due to the slouching pre-crash posture. In an attempt to help further reduce the chest loading while managing the head excursion, 3-point belts with pre-tensioner and load limiter, 4-point belts, DLT, inflatable belts, Bag in Roof (BiR) concept, and Self Conforming Rear-seat Air Bag (SCaRAB) concept were investigated in the second series of sled tests, in which only the most severe testing condition (0° and severe pulse) in the first sled series was used. Reductions in occupant loading were shown with these advanced restraint systems, especially the airbag features, to help reduce head, neck, and chest injury measures for rear-seat occupants. This study demonstrated the importance of considering the effects of occupant size and crash pulse on rear-seat occupant protection. Advanced restraint systems including features such as a pre-tensioner, a load limiter, and an airbag, may have the potential to help provide additional protection for rear-seat occupants with diverse occupant sizes.
Hu, JingwenFischer, KurtLange, PaulAdler, Angelo
Neck Validation of Multibody Human Model under Frontal and Lateral Impacts using an Optimization Technique2015-01-14694/14/2015
Multibody human models are widely used to investigate responses of human during an automotive crash. This study aimed to validate a commercially available multibody human body model against response corridors from volunteer tests conducted by Naval BioDynamics Laboratory (NBDL). The neck model consisted of seven vertebral bodies, and two adjacent bodies were connected by three orthogonal linear springs and dampers and three orthogonal rotational springs and dampers. The stiffness and damping characteristics were scaled up or down to improve the biofidelity of the neck model against NBDL volunteer test data because those characteristics were encrypted due to confidentiality. First, sensitivity analysis was performed to find influential scaling factors among the entire set using a design of experiment. Second, the identified scaling factors were adjusted using a gradient-based optimization technique to minimize a Biofidelity rank score (smaller the better), which is one of common technique for correlation analysis between PMHS responses and ones of a dummy or a model. In the sensitivity analysis 4 scaling factors out of 7 were found to be influential to the response of the neck model. The Biofidelity rank score was reduced from 1.63 to 0.90 through the optimization. The validated neck model showed more biofidelic responses in terms of resultant head acceleration, head rotation angle, and head relative displacement with respect to T1. The improved neck model through this study will provide more accurate head kinematics than the initial model during a vehicle-pedestrian collision, and the more accurate head kinematics will be enable more accurate prediction of the head injury risk, especially in the application of pedestrian collisions. Lastly, the methodology of this study can be applied to any other body region of a multibody model to improve its biofidelity.
Wang, YanKim, TaewungLi, YibingCrandall, Jeff
For decades, helicopter crews have reported suffering back, neck and leg pain they believe is related to service in helicopters. This presentation reviews testimony from nearly 10,000 helicopter crew members who have described their experiences with pain and injuries suffered during and after their military careers. The study quantifies, for the first time, the scope of this problem across the very large community of present and former military helicopter crewmembers, links the problem to associated direct and indirect costs, and discusses remedial designs or actions to reduce or eliminate the problem. Sponsored by the Department of Defense, Office of the Under Secretary (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics), the study discusses impact of this problem on combat readiness, mission effectiveness and safety. The report from this study was reviewed and approved by a Blue Ribbon Panel comprised of flag and general officers from all five military Services and a DoD civilian who leads medical science and technology efforts.
Healing, RichardHamon, Kristin
Autonomous robotic manipulators have the potential to increase manufacturing efficiency, provide in-home care, and reduce the risk to humans in hazardous situations. The current challenge in autonomous robotic manipulation is to approach the capabilities of dedicated, one-off manipulators in known environments with versatile, inexpensive, and ubiquitous manipulator systems that can operate in a range of environments with only high-level human input.
This SAE Surface Vehicle Information Report identifies and defines the assembly/disassembly and certification procedures relating to the use of the Hybrid III Large Male Test Dummy.
Dummy Testing and Equipment Committee
Hybrid III Head/Neck Analysis Highlighting Nij in NCAP2012-01-01024/16/2012
Nij, a function of upper neck forces and moment, plays a dominant role in the vehicle's star rating under the new NHTSA NCAP front impact program. This is mainly due to an artifact in the mapping of the Nij into the “risk” value used in the star rating, and the fact that the neck region is not weighted appropriately to reflect its real world significance relative to the other body regions in the NCAP rating. New test data also show that compared with the 50th male driver Nij, the 5th female passenger Nij is significantly more challenging to contain and therefore it is more dominant in the star rating. This paper describes the Hybrid III dummy head and neck impact response and provides a method to determine the external force acting on the head. The force and its acting point on the head are determined from head acceleration, angular acceleration, and the upper neck forces. This paper also analyzes the neck bending mechanism and the associated forces, and how the thorax rotation and translation can affect the upper neck forces. It discusses how the airbag shape and stiffness can affect the external force acting point and direction, and how the force affects the neck internal forces. The analyses have focused on the response of the 5th female dummy neck due to the aforementioned practical difficulty with its Nij. The analytical methods presented should aid in the understanding of vehicle restraint systems.
Wu, JianpingShi, YibingBeaudet, BrianNusholtz, Guy
Tractor-Semitrailer Driver and Sleeping Compartment Occupant Responses to Low-Speed Impacts2012-01-05664/16/2012
Low-speed collisions between tractor-semitrailers and passenger vehicles may result in large areas of visible damage to the passenger vehicle, but often produce limited damage to the tractor-semitrailer. Despite this, such accidents may lead to assertions of serious injury to the tractor driver and/or sleeper compartment occupant. Research regarding the impact environment and resulting injury potential of the occupants during these types of impacts is limited. This research investigated driver and sleeper compartment occupant responses to relatively low-speed and low-acceleration impact events. Five crash tests involving impact between a tractor-semitrailer and a passenger car were conducted. The test vehicles were a van semitrailer pulled by a tractor and three identical mid-sized sedans. The occupants of the tractor included a human driver and an un-instrumented Hybrid III 50th-percentile-male anthropomorphic test device (ATD). The human driver was seated in the driver seat, restrained by the available three-point seat belt assembly, and equipped with a six-degree-of-freedom head-mounted sensor package (rotational rate sensors and accelerometers) to measure head triaxial linear accelerations and angular velocities. The ATD was equipped with a sit-stand pelvis and positioned supine and unrestrained on the sleeper cab bunk. The tractor was instrumented with accelerometers, a yaw rate sensor, and a velocity sensor, and was equipped with onboard real-time cameras to capture the driver and passenger kinematics. The tests included four sideswipe events involving extended contact between the semitrailer bottom rail and dual wheels and the sides of the sedans, and a single perpendicular collision between the semitrailer dual wheel and the right front corner of a sedan. Tractor driver head center-of-gravity (CG) linear and angular accelerations, head angular velocities, and neck forces and moments were computed. Head and neck data were compared to volunteer studies of vigorous activities of daily living, published human tolerance levels, and Injury Assessment Reference Values (IARVs) used in compliance testing of passenger vehicles. It was determined that the biomechanical responses in the head and upper neck of the driver were well below the established IARVs; and the biomechanical responses in the head, upper neck, and lower neck were lower than or comparable to the responses of these body regions to the loads experienced by volunteers during non-injurious activities. Video documentation of the kinematics of the sleeper compartment occupant was obtained. That occupant was found to remain within the sleeping compartment under all conditions and did not experience motion likely to lead to injurious contact.
McGowan, Joseph C.Bussone, WilliamRaasch, ChristineSmith, James W.Smedley, Janine
Investigation on Occupant Ejection in High Severity Rear Impact based on Post Mortem Human Subject Sled Tests2011-22-000511/7/2011
Occupant protection in rear impact involves two competing challenges. On one hand, allowing a deformation of the seat would act as an energy absorber in low severity impacts and would consequently decrease the risk of neck injuries. However, on the other hand, large deformations of the seat may increase the likelihood of occupant ejection in high severity cases. Green et al., 1987 analyzed a total of 919 accidents in Great Britain. They found that occupant ejection resulted in a risk of severe injuries and fatalities between 3.6 and 4.5 times higher than those cases where no ejection was observed. The sample included single front, side and rear impacts as well as multiple impacts and rollover. The rate of belt use in the sample was 50%. While this analysis included all forms of impact scenarios, nevertheless, it highlights the relative injury severity of occupant ejection. Extensive literature search has found no full-scale rear impact tests involving Post Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS) conducted in a laboratory environment and resulting in ejection. This paper describes a total of 10 sled tests conducted on 3 belted PMHS using a simplified seat design composed of rigid plates assembled such that the angular and linear stiffness of the seatback (including the foam) was modeled. The initial angular position and the range of motion of the seatback, the size of the PMHS, the slack length of the seatbelt, the angular stiffness of the seatback, and the use of headrest were varied in the test matrix while the pulse was kept constant (triangular acceleration with a peak of 17 G at 30 ms and a duration of 95 ms). In the test series, the tests were not run randomly but the likelihood of occupant ejection was increased systematically until ejection occurred. PMHS seat ejection was observed only for the 95th percentile, initially positioned with a seatback angle relative to the vertical equal to 22°, a range of seatback angular motion equal to 44° and no headrest. Repeating the test under the same conditions but with the pretensioner fired did not prevent the ejection. In addition, the 50th percentile belted specimen was not observed to sustain rearward seat ejection under realistic conditions including the use of headrest.
Petit, PhilippeLuet, CarolePotier, PascalVallancien, Guy
Development of a Duration Threshold for Modulating Evoked Neuronal Responses After Nerve Root Compression Injury2011-22-000111/7/2011
Cervical nerve roots are susceptible to compression injuries of various durations. The duration of an applied compression has been shown to contribute to both the onset of persistent pain and also the degree of spinal cellular and molecular responses related to nociception. This study investigated the relationship between peripherally evoked activity in spinal cord neurons during a root compression and the resulting development of axonal damage. Electrically evoked spikes were measured in the spinal cord as a function of time during and after (post-compression) a 15 minute compression of the C7 nerve root. Compression to the root significantly (p=0.035) reduced the number of spikes that were evoked over time relative to sham. The critical time for compression to maximally reduce evoked spikes was 6.6±3.0 minutes. A second study measured the post-compression evoked neuronal activity following compression applied for a shorter, sub-threshold time (three minutes). Ten minutes after compression was removed, the discharge rate remained significantly (p=0.018) less than baseline by 58±25% relative to sham after the 15 minute compression, but returned to within 3±33% of baseline after the three minute compression. Axonal damage was evident in the nerve root at day seven after nerve root compression only after a 15 minute compression. These studies demonstrate that even a transient mechanical insult to the nerve root is sufficient to induce sustained neuronal dysfunction and axonal pathology associated with pain, and results provide support that such minor neural tissue traumas can actually induce long-lasting functional deficits.
Nicholson, Kristen J.Quindlen, Julia C.Winkelstein, Beth A.
Evaluation of the Repeatability and Reproducibility on BioRIDIIg In Rear-Impact Sled Test2011-01-02764/12/2011
A large study of rear-end collisions was conducted for the neck injury indicators and test procedures. Neck injury in low-speed rear-end collisions is a big issue because there are a lot of patients despite low-speed rear-end collisions. Europe, Korea and Japan introduced the specific part in the New Car Assessment Program to reduce whiplash injury in low-speed rear-end collisions. From the legal point of view, to reduce the frequency and severity of injuries caused by rearward displacement of the head in rear-end collision, USA, EC, Korea, Japan and others internationally cooperated to make the global technical regulation (GTR) in UNECE/WP29. In 2008, after much meandering, GTR No. 7 head restraints were established. However the GTR No.7 is not a unique regulation because many countries had their own opinions and domestic regulations, and many questions related to injury criteria and biomechanical issues of dummy remain unresolved. The Biofidelic Rear Impact Dummy II (BioRIDII) is regarded as possessing the most similar characteristics to human volunteers and Post-mortem Human Subjects(PMHS) in terms of its response to low-speed rear impacts. Although a great amount of research was conducted for repeatability and reproducibility on the BioRIDII, the research results did not directly suggest the neck injury criteria and limit values for the regulation. The purpose of this research is to review the proper neck injury indicators for the BioRID-II through the low-rear sled test on the 3set BioRIDII ver-g. A series of sled tests were conducted to assess the adequacy of neck injury indicators for the repeatability and reproducibility of results obtained on the 3set BioRIDII. The sled tests were performed according to the test procedure proposed by the Korea New Car assessment Program (KNCAP). Neck injury indicators including NIC, Nkm, upper & lower Fx, upper & lower Fz, T1 X acc, Head X acc, were analysed for each dummy. The results show that some criteria, such as the neck shear force, exhibit coefficient variation (CV) up to 20.
Kim, Si-Wooshim, So-JungSuh, Myung-Won
Lower Cervical Spine Loading in Frontal Sled Tests Using Inverse Dynamics: Potential Applications for Lower Neck Injury Criteria2010-22-000811/3/2010
Lower cervical spine injuries are more common in survivors of motor vehicle crashes sustaining neck trauma. Injury criteria are determined using upper neck loads in dummies although a lower neck load cell exists. Due to a paucity of lower neck data from post mortem human subject (PMHS) studies, this research was designed to determine the head-neck biomechanics with a focus on lower neck metrics and injuries. Sixteen frontal impact tests were conducted using five belted PMHS. Instrumentation consisted of a pyramid-shaped nine accelerometer package on the head, tri-axial accelerometer on T1, and uniaxial accelerometer on the sled. Three-dimensional kinematics of the head-neck complex were obtained using a 20-camera high-speed motion analysis system. Testing sequence was: low (3.6 m/s), medium (6.9 m/s), repeat low, and high (15.8 m/s) velocities. Trauma evaluations were made between tests. Testing was terminated upon confirmation of injuries. Autopsy was conducted, and geometric and inertial properties of the head were determined. Using inverse dynamics, upper and lower neck loads were determined, along with head and T1 kinematics. Lower cervical injuries occurred in four specimens during the loading phase and were attributed to the flexion mechanism. Peak upper and lower neck loading magnitudes and head-neck and T1 kinematics are given for each test. Sagittal plane head center of gravity and T1 kinematic data along with upper and lower neck forces and moments, hitherto not reported in literature, may be used to determine the biofidelity responses of frontal impact dummies and establish lower neck injury criteria.
Pintar, Frank A.Yoganandan, NarayanMaiman, Dennis J.
Development of Lower Neck Injury Assessment Reference Values Based on Comparison of ATD and PMHS Tests2010-01-01404/12/2010
Previous studies have suggested injury assessment reference values (IARVs) for lower neck injury based on scaled upper neck values. This study developed independent flexion and extension IARVs for the lower neck by matching Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD) data to impact-tested post-mortem human subjects (PMHSs) with mid- to low-cervical spine injuries. Pendulum and sled tests with Hybrid III midsize male and small female ATDs were run under conditions mimicking those of published PMHS torso drop-sled tests and other PMHS studies. Measurements included upper and lower neck forces and moments, head acceleration, head rotation rate, and head/neck angles for the pendulum tests. Rear impacts corresponding to rigid seatback tests without a head restraint produced lower neck extension moments that increased dramatically with test severity, as measured by increasing delta-V and/or decreasing pulse duration. In contrast, upper neck extension moments increased only modestly with test severity, and all recorded peak values of upper neck force and moment, as well as calculated Nij, were below currently accepted IARVs. Our proposed lower neck IARVs are well below those previously published, which are based on simple scaling of upper neck IARVs. Frontal impact tests provided an indication that injuries may occur at lower neck flexion moment values that are below suggested tolerances; however, since the available PMHS dataset only included injured subjects for which the observations were left censored, no IARV could be determined. Relationships between peak moments at the upper and lower neck, as well as between male and female ATDs in tests of matching severity, were examined and compared to standard scaling used for previously proposed IARVs. Peak moment versus tension and compression forces were also evaluated, yielding additional data points for estimating critical intercepts for lower neck injury criteria (Nij).
Raasch, ChristineCarhart, MichaelIvarsson, B. JohanLucas, Scott
ES2 Neck Injury Assessment Reference Values for Lateral Loading in Side Facing Seats2009-22-001511/2/2009
Injury assessment reference values (IARV) predicting neck injuries are currently not available for side facing seated aircraft passengers in crash conditions. The aircraft impact scenario results in inertial loading of the head and neck, a condition known to be inherently different from common automotive side impact conditions as crash pulse and seating configurations are different. The objective of this study is to develop these IARV for the European Side Impact Dummy-2 (ES-2) previously selected by the US-FAA as the most suitable ATD for evaluating side facing aircraft seats. The development of the IARV is an extended analysis of previously published PMHS neck loads by identifying the most likely injury scenarios, comparing head-neck kinematics and neck loads of the ES2 versus PMHS, and development of injury risk curves for the ES2. The ES2 showed a similar kinematic response as the PMHS, particularly during the loading phase. The ES2 exhibited a stiffer response than the PMHS in the thoracic region, resulting in a faster rebound and smaller excursions in the vertical direction. Neck loads were consistent with results from previous authors and served as the basis for the ES2 neck injury risk curve developed here. Regression analysis of the previously published PMHS neck loads indicated that the tension force at the occipital condyles was the only neck load component with a significant correlation (Pearson r2=0.9158) to AIS3+ classified injuries. Tension force in the ES2 upper neck showed a weaker but still significant correlation with injury severity (r2=0.72) and is proposed to be used as an IARV with a tolerance of 2094 N for 50% AIS3+ risk. Although the prime focus of this study is on loading conditions typical in an aircraft crash environment, it is expected that the proposed IARV's can be used as an extension of typical automotive conditions, particularly for military vehicles and public transport applications where side facing upright seating configurations are more common.
Philippens, M.Wismans, J.Forbes, P. A.Yoganandan, N.Pintar, F. A.Soltis, S. J.
The purpose of this document is to provide the user with the procedures needed to properly assemble and disassemble the 50th percentile male Hybrid III dummy, certify its components and verify its mass and dimensions. Also within this manual are guidelines for handling accelerometers, repairing flesh and setting joints.
Dummy Testing and Equipment Committee
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 186