Browse Topic: Refueling emissions
Several gasoline supply companies have introduced versions of reformulated gasolines to gain experience in manufacturing, transporting, and marketing this new type of gasoline while providing environmental benefits. This paper describes the evaluation of one such reformulated gasoline on a variety of engine and vehicle technologies. The reformulated gasoline tested in this program is marketed exclusively in the metropolitan St. Louis area. Thus, a side-by-side comparison of fuels representing the average gasoline sold in St. Louis and the reformulated gasoline was made. The reformulated gasoline was blended at the limits of established manufacturing specifications to provide a conservative estimate of the environmental benefits of such a fuel. Emissions and driveability performance of both fuels were tested in cars representing four distinct vehicle technologies. The technology classes represented were non-catalyst, open loop oxidation catalyst, closed loop non-adaptive three-way catalyst, and adaptive learning three-way catalyst equipped vehicles. A total of eight vehicles was tested ranging in model years from 1973 to 1989. The standard Federal Test Procedure with a modified preparation cycle was employed to evaluate the vehicle emission response. Exhaust and evaporative emission measurements were made with complete hydrocarbon speciation and toxic identification. Results of the comparative testing indicated significant reductions of carbon monoxide, total hydrocarbons, oxides of nitrogen, benzene and 1,3 butadiene in 1980 and newer vehicles. Older vehicles (pre-1980) also showed significant reductions of diurnal evaporative hydrocarbon emissions, carbon monoxide, oxides of nitrogen and benzene but increases in hot soak hydrocarbon emissions. All cars showed increases in formaldehyde emissions with the older cars also showing increases in acetaldehyde. The data were used to model the impact of this new gasoline formulation on the St. Louis metropolitan area. The Environmental Protection Agency's MOBILE4 inventory model was employed to project benefits for the years 1995 and 2005 should all gasoline sold in the St. Louis area be the tested reformulated gasoline.
Evaporative emission levels have been determined in a CONCAWE* programme for a range of ten uncontrolled European vehicles using a modified SHED test procedure as developed by the CEC*. Three extra vehicles were tested which were equipped with evaporative and exhaust emission control systems, but of the same make and model as three of the uncontrolled test cars. The vehicles were tested using several warm-up cycles and on a range of fuels whose volatility parameters were independently varied, including oxygenate blends. Exhaust emissions were determined and a few measurements of true diurnal emissions carried out. Vehicle fuel system design had the greatest effect on evaporative emissions which varied between 4 to 16 g/test on a typical European summer fuel. Gasoline volatility had a significant but smaller effect and RVP was shown to be the dominant fuel parameter. At the same volatility, oxygenate blends gave similar or lower emissions than hydrocarbon fuels. Hot-soak and running losses increased significantly with increasing warm-up cycle severity. True diurnal emissions were found to be significant and of similar magnitude to combined hot-soak and running losses. The carbon canister emission control systems tested were very effective and reduced emissions by up to 85 per cent.
Refueling emissions from a 1986 Pontiac Grand Am were characterized using 3 test fuels, including a winter, summer and intermediate blend gasoline under a variety of seasonal temperature conditions. The effects of varying fuel volatility (10.1 to 13.3 psi RVP), dispensed fuel temperature (50 to 88°F), and vehicle tank fuel temperature (40 to 108°F), were investigated. Hydrocarbon (HC) emissions ranged from 2.90 to 7.41 grams per gallon of delivered fuel. Detailed hydrocarbon analyses were completed for both the test fuels (dispensed fuel and tank fuel) and the refueling emissions. The average (all test fuels and temperature scenarios) test gasoline composition was 46.1% paraffins, 6.3% olefins, 45.2% aromatics, with an average carbon number of 7.42; the average HC emission rate was 4.69 g/gal; and the average emissions composition was 81.4% paraffins, 12.2% olefins, 5.4% aromatics, with an average carbon number of 4.79. Butanes and pentanes comprised about 70% of the total HC refueling emissions.
This paper describes the results of a study to examine the effects of various experimental variables on the quantity and composition of emissions associated with motor vehicle refueling. Problems related to accurate laboratory simulation of vehicle refueling are discussed. Preliminary results include emission rates for total hydrocarbons, benzene and 82 other hydrocarbon compounds for a single test vehicle under a variety of temperature and test conditions.
Items per page:
50
1 – 38 of 38