Browse Topic: Refueling emissions

Items (38)
Summary and Analysis of 2000-2015 Model Year IUVP Evaporative and Refueling Emission Data2017-01-50089/11/2017
As part of an effort to shift focus from the emissions performance of pre-production prototypes in certification to the emissions performance of in-use vehicles, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) instituted the “CAP 2000” program. As part of that program, manufacturers are required to retrieve customer-operated in-use vehicles and test their emissions. The EPA and CARB rules contain specific sample size and mileage criteria. The program has been in place for over 15 model years. This paper examines the in-use performance results for 3115 refueling tests, 3844 hot soak+2-day diurnal evaporative emission tests covering five sets of regulatory emission standards, and evaluates several related regulatory issues such as in-use durability and the effectiveness of evaporative on-board diagnostic (OBD) systems. The in-use verification program (IUVP) test results show very high pass rates (95%+) for refueling and evaporative emission tests (except partial zero emission vehicles (PZEV)) and average compliance levels well below the applicable emission standard for odometer readings ranging from 10,000 to 130, 000 miles. PZEV evaporative pass rates were about 91 percent. There was no statistical relationship found between odometer mileage and emission rates. OBD systems performed well in not setting a diagnostic trouble code (DTC) when the vehicle passed the evaporative and refueling emission standards but were not as effective in identifying failures.
Passavant, Glenn W.
Well-to Wheel Greenhouse Gas Emissions of LNG Used as a Fuel for Long Haul Trucks in a European Scenario2013-24-01109/8/2013
The EU Commission's “Clean Power for Transport” initiative aims to break the EU's dependence on imported oil whilst promoting the use of alternative fuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Among the options considered is the use of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a substitute for diesel in long haul trucks. It is interesting to ask how the lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of LNG compare with conventional diesel fuel for this application. The LNG available in Europe is mainly imported. This paper considers the “well-to-tank” emissions of LNG from various production routes, including: gas production, treatment and liquefaction, shipping to Europe, terminal, distribution and refuelling operations. “Tank-to-Wheel” emissions are considered for a range of currently-available engine technologies of varying efficiency relative to diesel. If LNG is used in a direct-injection engine having the same efficiency as a diesel engine, the “well-to-wheel” GHG emissions are typically around 19% lower than conventional diesel, or around 17% lower than diesel containing 7% FAME (B7). Different sources of LNG may have higher or lower savings, depending on the efficiency of liquefaction and the shipping distance. In the best cases, the WtW reduction may be as high as 25%. Some natural gas engines in the market are significantly less efficient than diesel engines. GHG emissions increase with reducing engine efficiency and in some cases in some cases, the gas engine could have higher WtW emissions than an equivalent diesel engine.
Kofod, MaxStephenson, Trevor
The Effect of Heavy Olefins and Ethanol on Gasoline Emissions2004-01-20036/8/2004
The effect of total olefin content on ozone forming potential has been widely studied. As a result a stringent limit for olefins is already given in California Specification for “Phase 2” gasoline and the 18 vol% limitation of olefins is expected to tighten also in Europe. However, it is not clear how determining the light olefins are and what is the role of heavy olefins regarding ozone forming potential. Ethanol is widely used as gasoline component in many countries, but not extensively in Europe. The biofuels have the potential to provide a renewable source of energy and contribute to lower global CO2 emissions. The unregulated emissions, especially particulates and their quality have not been studied extensively with ethanol containing gasoline using European test fleet. The objective was to study the applicability of heavy olefins in non-oxygenated and ethanol oxygenated gasolines. Alkylates in gasoline were replaced by isooctene. Exhaust emission were measured and ozone forming potential was estimated. Adding heavy olefins in the form of isooctene showed no major changes in the tailpipe exhaust emissions: regulated emissions, particulate matter, carbon dioxide emission, fuel consumption or unregulated emissions. However some changes for individual hydrocarbons were seen. The preliminary work and estimations indicated that adding isooctene would not increase the ozone forming potential. Thus no real environmental benefit is expected, if the total content of olefins is limited. The limitation should cover only the amount of light olefins (C5 and lighter). According to our measurements it is also possible to replace ethers to ethanol with same volumetric content without degrading exhaust emissions.
Pentikäinen, JuhaRantanen, LeenaAakko, Päivi
Cost Effectiveness of the California Low Emission Vehicle Standards9404713/1/1994
The “Low Emission Vehicle” (LEV) standards adopted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) require that large-volume manufacturers begin selling electric vehicles in 1998 and that over 99% control of hydrocarbon exhaust emissions be achieved on most other vehicles. When the LEV standards were adopted, the CARB staff estimated that prices for gasoline-fueled cars would increase by $70-170 per vehicle. The price premium for electric cars was estimated to be $1,350. However, a review of detailed information supplied by automobile manufacturers and vendors of emissions control equipment indicates that the actual cost of meeting the LEV standards will be much higher. Based on the least expensive systems currently under development by vehicle manufacturers, and assuming costs decline by 5% per year, the average price associated with meeting the LEV standards will be about $1,000 higher than vehicles certified to the 1993 federal standards, not including the effect of the 10% electric vehicle mandate. If the public will not pay the estimated $21,000 premium for electric vehicles, the price of the average California vehicle could increase by an additional $2,100 to subsidize the sales of electric vehicles. The increase in average vehicle prices necessary to offset the price premium for electric vehicles is projected to suppress new vehicle sales, causing hydrocarbon emissions to be higher than without the electric vehicle mandate. If other states require California-certified cars, price increases would be somewhat lower due to economies of scale. Assuming nationwide adoption of the LEV standards, the price increase over 1993 models for gasoline-fueled vehicles is projected to be $775 and the price premium for electric vehicles is estimated at $12,600. With a 10% electric vehicle sales mandate, the price of the average new vehicle would be expected to increase by approximately $2,000. Except for the electric vehicle mandate, the LEV standards might be economically justified in California because of that state's more serious air pollution problems. Outside of California, the LEV standards are projected to result in a cost to society that exceeds the economic benefits by more than a factor of ten.
Austin, Thomas C.Lyons, James M.
Aggregate Vehicle Emission Estimates for Evaluating Control Strategies9403033/1/1994
Currently, states that are out of compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards must, according to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA), develop and implement control strategies that demonstrate specific degrees of reduction in emissions-with the degree of reduction depending upon the severity of the problem. One tool that has been developed to aid regulators in both deciding an appropriate course of action and to demonstrate the desired reductions in mobile emissions is EPA's Mobile 5a emission estimation model. In our study, Mobile 5a has been used to examine the effects of regulatory strategies, as applied to the Northeast United States, on vehicle emissions under worst-case ozone-forming conditions. We examined the effects of the following mandatory and discretionary measures: inspection and maintenance (I/M), enhanced I/M, anti-tampering, reformulated gasolines (RFG I & 11), Federal Tier I & II vehicle standards, California's program of emission standards (LEV, ULEV, ZEV), Stage II refueling, and on-board vapor recovery (VRS). The rank order of effectiveness, for pollutant reduction, of these measures depends on the pollutant and the time period chosen. Two time periods are of interest, near-term (1993-2000) and far-term (2000-2010). In terms of non-methane organic gas (NMOG) emission reductions in the near-term, RFG I is the most effective measure followed by enhanced I/M and then regular I/M with less effectiveness attributable to the remaining programs. In the long-term the benefits from RFG I & II on NMOG emissions are still present; however, they are overshadowed by those from I/M programs and Tier I vehicles. The NOx situation is different due to the smaller benefit of reformulated gasolines on NOx emissions. In the short-term the largest benefits come from I/M programs with those from Tier I vehicles emerging by the year 2000. In the long-term regular I/M and Tier I vehicles are the most significant measures with fewer benefits from enhanced I/M. The results we obtain indicate that the adoption of the California vehicles in the Northeast instead of Tier I vehicles, with the other requirements of the 1990 CAAA, would not provide any emissions benefits before the year 2005. This is due, primarily to the reduced benefits of I/M assumed in Mobile 5a for California cars. In accordance with this result, the sensitivity of the aggregate fleet emissions to the possible phase-in date of the California cars is small. A separate finding is that the in-use aggregate-fleet emissions of light-duty trucks are not attenuated by fleet rollover as substantially as those of the light-duty passenger cars. Additionally, the relative growth rate in vehicle miles traveled for light-duty trucks is much higher. Thus, the relative contribution of light-duty trucks to vehicle emissions is predicted to increase.
Fox, Jonathan W.Heywood, John B.McRae, Gregory
A Study of VOC Running Losses from European Canister-Equipped Vehicles9309453/1/1993
Six European vehicles fitted with carbon canisters have been tested under severe conditions to establish if evaporative losses of volatile organic compounds occur under European driving conditions - so-called “running losses”. The programme entailed the development of a point source measurement technique which has a number of advantages over other methods currently in use. Following the development and validation of the measurement technique, the six vehicles were tested at 28C over a range of driving cycles on a gasoline with a Reid vapour pressure of 90 kPa. None of the vehicles exhibited classical running losses, i.e. losses during higher-speed driving. This was due to the effectiveness of canister purging in these conditions. However, significant volatile organic compound (VOC) losses were observed for several vehicles during idle after a period of driving had heated the fuel. Substantial car-to-car variation was observed in the losses obtained. The losses were always more severe over longer idling periods, and more severe than hot soak over comparable periods. This may have important implications for urban pollution. Critical factors affecting running losses are fuel temperature and purging strategy. Higher fuel temperatures increase vapour generation and hence the canister charging rate. Purging rates must be sufficient to overcome the charging rate. Larger carbon canisters (LCC) were found to be more effective than small carbon canisters (SCC) in reducing running/idling losses because of the extra adsorbent capacity available. Mitigation of refuelling losses is an added benefit. Systems that combine the canister with a pressurized fuel tank, in order to limit VOC charging of the canister, were shown to run the risk of VOC losses from sources other than the canister vent.
Morgan, T. B. D.Betts, W. E.Hutcheson, R. C.McArragher, J. S.Schmiedel, H. P.Snelgrove, D. G.
Several gasoline supply companies have introduced versions of reformulated gasolines to gain experience in manufacturing, transporting, and marketing this new type of gasoline while providing environmental benefits. This paper describes the evaluation of one such reformulated gasoline on a variety of engine and vehicle technologies. The reformulated gasoline tested in this program is marketed exclusively in the metropolitan St. Louis area. Thus, a side-by-side comparison of fuels representing the average gasoline sold in St. Louis and the reformulated gasoline was made. The reformulated gasoline was blended at the limits of established manufacturing specifications to provide a conservative estimate of the environmental benefits of such a fuel. Emissions and driveability performance of both fuels were tested in cars representing four distinct vehicle technologies. The technology classes represented were non-catalyst, open loop oxidation catalyst, closed loop non-adaptive three-way catalyst, and adaptive learning three-way catalyst equipped vehicles. A total of eight vehicles was tested ranging in model years from 1973 to 1989. The standard Federal Test Procedure with a modified preparation cycle was employed to evaluate the vehicle emission response. Exhaust and evaporative emission measurements were made with complete hydrocarbon speciation and toxic identification. Results of the comparative testing indicated significant reductions of carbon monoxide, total hydrocarbons, oxides of nitrogen, benzene and 1,3 butadiene in 1980 and newer vehicles. Older vehicles (pre-1980) also showed significant reductions of diurnal evaporative hydrocarbon emissions, carbon monoxide, oxides of nitrogen and benzene but increases in hot soak hydrocarbon emissions. All cars showed increases in formaldehyde emissions with the older cars also showing increases in acetaldehyde. The data were used to model the impact of this new gasoline formulation on the St. Louis metropolitan area. The Environmental Protection Agency's MOBILE4 inventory model was employed to project benefits for the years 1995 and 2005 should all gasoline sold in the St. Louis area be the tested reformulated gasoline.
Schoonveld, Gary A.Marshall, William F.
Evaporative emission levels have been determined in a CONCAWE* programme for a range of ten uncontrolled European vehicles using a modified SHED test procedure as developed by the CEC*. Three extra vehicles were tested which were equipped with evaporative and exhaust emission control systems, but of the same make and model as three of the uncontrolled test cars. The vehicles were tested using several warm-up cycles and on a range of fuels whose volatility parameters were independently varied, including oxygenate blends. Exhaust emissions were determined and a few measurements of true diurnal emissions carried out. Vehicle fuel system design had the greatest effect on evaporative emissions which varied between 4 to 16 g/test on a typical European summer fuel. Gasoline volatility had a significant but smaller effect and RVP was shown to be the dominant fuel parameter. At the same volatility, oxygenate blends gave similar or lower emissions than hydrocarbon fuels. Hot-soak and running losses increased significantly with increasing warm-up cycle severity. True diurnal emissions were found to be significant and of similar magnitude to combined hot-soak and running losses. The carbon canister emission control systems tested were very effective and reduced emissions by up to 85 per cent.
McArragher, J. S.Betts, W. E.Brandt, J.Kiessfing, D.Marchesi, G. F.Owen, K.Pearson, J. K.Schug, K. P.Sneigrove, D. G.
Refueling emissions from a 1986 Pontiac Grand Am were characterized using 3 test fuels, including a winter, summer and intermediate blend gasoline under a variety of seasonal temperature conditions. The effects of varying fuel volatility (10.1 to 13.3 psi RVP), dispensed fuel temperature (50 to 88°F), and vehicle tank fuel temperature (40 to 108°F), were investigated. Hydrocarbon (HC) emissions ranged from 2.90 to 7.41 grams per gallon of delivered fuel. Detailed hydrocarbon analyses were completed for both the test fuels (dispensed fuel and tank fuel) and the refueling emissions. The average (all test fuels and temperature scenarios) test gasoline composition was 46.1% paraffins, 6.3% olefins, 45.2% aromatics, with an average carbon number of 7.42; the average HC emission rate was 4.69 g/gal; and the average emissions composition was 81.4% paraffins, 12.2% olefins, 5.4% aromatics, with an average carbon number of 4.79. Butanes and pentanes comprised about 70% of the total HC refueling emissions.
Braddock, James N.
This paper describes the results of a study to examine the effects of various experimental variables on the quantity and composition of emissions associated with motor vehicle refueling. Problems related to accurate laboratory simulation of vehicle refueling are discussed. Preliminary results include emission rates for total hydrocarbons, benzene and 82 other hydrocarbon compounds for a single test vehicle under a variety of temperature and test conditions.
Braddock, James N.Gabele, Peter A.Lemmons, Thomas J.
Vehicle Evaporative and Exhaust Emissions as Influenced by Benzene Content of Gasoline8605313/1/1986
Five late model vehicles equipped with representative emission control systems were used to determine the effect of benzene concentration of gasolines on evaporative and exhaust benzene emissions. The vehicle selection included three different fuel induction systems and two different exhaust emissions control systems. The test fuels consisted of 25 and 40% aromatic base fuels each at four benzene levels ranging from 0.02 to 4%. Evaporative and exhaust determinations included measurement of regulated emission components and benzene emission in each test segment. Benzene level in the fuel tank head space was also measured. In addition to the above evaporative and exhaust emission test program, exhaust samples were collected simultaneously before and after the exhaust emissions control system to determine engine-out and tailpipe-out emission rates as well as the catalyst conversion efficiency. Benzene levels in evaporative and exhaust emissions and tank head space vapor all increased linearly with increasing fuel benzene level. Only the tank head space measurements showed no benzene with benzene-free fuel. Tests with benzene-free fuel showed that the measured benzene evaporative and exhaust emissions were due to canister elution of benzene captured from previous test fuels and benzene formation during combustion, respectively. Vehicular benzene emission rates were computed from measured evaporative emissions, exhaust emissions, and estimated refueling loss. The fleet-averaged total benzene emission rates ranged from 10 to 31 milligrams per mile and were linearly related to benzene level in the test fuel. For 1.5 vol-% benzene fuel, the contributions to the total benzene emissions averaged about 70% exhaust, 20% evaporative, and 10% refueling. Comparison of benzene emission measurements before and after the catalyst showed that the benzene level was reduced about 74 to 95%, and the hydrocarbon reduction ranged from 82 to 91% among the five cars. The evaporative benzene carry-over study showed that evaporative benzene emissions were directly affected by the composition of prior test fuels for as many as two or three prior tests.
Seizirtger, D. E.Marshall, W. F.Cox, F. W.Boyd, M. W.
Items per page:
1 – 38 of 38