Browse Topic: Expendable launch vehicles

Items (69)
This program was developed to fill a need within the Wallops Flight Facility workflow for automation of the development of vertical plan limit lines used by flight safety officers during the conduct of expendable launch vehicle missions.
This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) addresses the following: 1 Captures previous experience and lessons learned in the application of PM. 2 Tabulates public-domain applications, and several representative examples discussed in detail. 3 Notes relative merits and barriers to implementation. The document does not contain technical details of probabilistic methods, benchmarking of specific approaches or legal aspects. These subjects are covered in other AIRs, referenced in Section 2 and prepared by the Probabilistic Methods Committee of the G-11 Reliability, Maintainability, Supportability and Logistics (RMSL) Division of SAE.
G-11 Probabilistic Methods Committee
SCOUT: EVA Capabilities of the Space Construction and Orbital Utility Transport2004-01-22957/19/2004
The University of Maryland has performed a detailed design for the space equivalent of an atmospheric diving suit. The Space Construction and Orbital Utility Transport (SCOUT) is a small single-person spacecraft, with all necessary utilities for extended sorties away from the host station. Through a pair of AX-5 style space suit arms integrated into the cabin wall, as well as a trio of dexterous manipulators, the SCOUT operator can directly interact with the work site environment, performing spacecraft servicing, structural assembly, or other tasks traditionally done by an astronaut in a space suit. Originally designed as an augmentation to the NASA Gateway station architecture for the Earth-Moon L1 system, studies indicate that a SCOUT-type EVA system would represent a substantial benefit to International Space Station operations as well. Due to the integrated robotics system, ISS extravehicular operations, which nominally require two EVA crew and one IVA robotics operator, can be done with a single SCOUT pod unaided. One of the requirements to allow safe single-pod operations is a high-reliability system to ensure crew survival. To this end, SCOUT incorporates several design features to increase mission assurance and maximize the probability of crew survival following a catastrophic failure. Since SCOUT is designed around an 8.3 psi cabin pressure, there are no prebreathe requirements prior to start of operations. This will allow a second SCOUT pod to be kept on “ready alert” at the station, with its operator performing other tasks but ready to react in a contingency. The second SCOUT safety feature is the adoption of an innovative “bail-out” system. In the event of a failure which renders SCOUT uninhabitable, in less than a minute the operator can deploy an emergency bail-out system, normally kept in a small package on the SCOUT hull. A single valve actuation will inflate an all-fabric escape suit, consisting of a simple cylindrical body with polycarbonate face plate and adjustable-length arms, mounted to the SCOUT cabin via a pressure hatch. The operator will then move into the escape suit, close the hatch, then detach from SCOUT. The system provides three hours of life support, along with SAFER-style cold gas thrusters for mobility. Between the second SCOUT pod on ready alert and the self-rescue capability of the escape suit, a probabilistic risk assessment shows a 99.9% chance of performing a 600-EVA mission model without loss of crew. Additional systems have also been designed to extend the operating range of the SCOUT system. A docking module was designed to support two SCOUT pods, providing docking interfaces to the host station and SCOUT-specific resupply/repair capabilities. The docking module docks to space station through the use of an International Space Station common berthing mechanism (CBM). An extended mission package provides support for SCOUT in remote operations, extending sortie times from 11 hours to several days. In conjunction with an orbital maneuvering vehicle, the extended mission package would allow an ISS-based SCOUT to be used for human servicing at geostationary orbit, and from an L1 base would allow SCOUT operations in lunar orbit.
Akin, David L.Bowden, Mary L.
Multi-faceted Approach for Initial Volume Determination for Smaller Lightweight 2 nd Generation Space Planes2003-01-23477/7/2003
The SLI proposed requirements for a Crew Transfer Vehicle, CTV, have evolved from a Shuttle-like multipurpose vehicle concept to a vehicle with a requirement to merely transport 3-5 crewmembers (a space taxi) to the International Space Station. In an effort to minimize the weight and cost of this Orbital Space Plane, OSP (previously known as CTV) and to optimize the total 2nd Generation Reusable Launch Vehicle approach, the requirements for OSP have dictated a much smaller crew cabin than the Shuttle astronauts have utilized. The challenge to the human factors engineers is to develop a set of derived requirements for the crew volume. Several analysis approaches have been used, compared, and evaluated against the key drivers. The drivers of these approaches are the physical and psychological limits of humans, operational requirements, time on orbit, task requirements, crew accommodations/technologies, packaging, volume layout and application of lessons learned. This paper both describes the approaches and rationales used to develop initial crew volume requirements for the various OSP design reference missions and summarizes the resulting requirements identified. While significantly smaller, the recommended volume requirements will aid vehicle designers during the concept development and insure enough volume is allocated for humans. An additional benefit is the pushing back on questionable/soft system requirements for trade decisions affected by vehicle size and weight.
Lytle, Bill
NASA's Space Launch Initiative: A Program Overview2002-01-12673/4/2002
For fiscal year 2001 (FY2001), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) reorganized its efforts to develop a 2nd Generation Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) under the new Space Launch Initiative program. The stated goal of the Space Launch Initiative (SLI) is the development of new technologies over a five-year period that will lead to a decision mid-decade on whether to move forward with a new design, which will eventually replace the space shuttle. This new vehicle will be 100 times safer and 10 times cheaper than today's launch systems. In its FY2001 budget, NASA requested and received $290 million and for FY2002 requested $475 million, a 64% increase although lower than the $610 million NASA initially planned to request for FY2002. The total planned budget is approximately $4.4 billion through FY2005. The capabilities of the resulting launch vehicle will be a failure rate of 1 in 10,000 and $1000 per pound to low earth orbit. To achieve this safety margin, it is widely accepted that the new vehicle will require a complete crew escape system. By comparison, the space shuttle only has escape capabilities to 20,000 feet. Other capabilities include 10 person launch crews (compared to 170 today), one-week turnaround time (compared to five months) and hundreds of flights per year (compared to fewer than 10 times per year today).1 The question is, can SLI's research funds lead to technology which will be able to develop a 2nd generation RLV capable of all (or some) of the above listed objectives? Also, how will SLI and the 2nd generation RLV affect space commerce?
Rohrbacher, John J.
What Should the United States do after the Space Shuttle?9410373/1/1994
In the past decade, the space shuttle has been the key factor for the United States manned space exploration. In fact the space shuttle is the only means in which the United States government can send humans into space. However, the space shuttle's life-expectancy is due to expire around the year 2005. In preparation for the end of the space shuttle era, we, as a country, must decide what type of future space vehicle is appropriate to accomplish our future national goals in space. There are many public policy alternatives to the question: ‘What will replace the space shuttle?’ First, the United States could try a conservative approach to space exploration by developing and using an unmanned vehicle. Second, the government could opt for utility by developing a mixed fleet of launch vehicles. Third, the United States could try to modify and update the current space shuttles with new technology. Fourth, the United States could choose to invest its money in more ‘exotic’ space vehicle programs such as the Single-Stage-To-Orbit(SSTO) space plane and the Two-Stage-To-Orbit(TSTO) space plane. Lastly, the United States could try to initiate talks with other countries concerning an international space agency that could pool the finances and resources into one unified space program. In my final recommendation, I would first look into a possible international cooperation for future funding and operation of space transportation. However, if this first objective is unable to produce any type of cooperation within a couple of years, I would initiate a parallel future space vehicle program that would involve most of the modification of the space shuttle option and all of the mixed fleet option. Along with these main public policy recommendations, I also recommend some administrative suggestions that could prove vital in trying to carry out the public policy of future space vehicles.
Yamada, Eric Ricky
An Electromechanical Actuation System for an Expendable Launch Vehicle9291128/3/1992
A major effort at the NASA Lewis Research Center in recent years has been to develop electromechanical actuators (EMA's) to replace the hydraulic systems used for thrust vector control (TVC) on launch vehicles. This is an attempt to overcome the inherent inefficiencies and costs associated with the existing hydraulic structures. General Dynamics Space Systems Division, under contract to NASA Lewis, is developing 18.6 kW (25 hp), 29.8 kW (40 hp), and 52.2 kW (70 hp) peak EMA systems to meet the power demands for TVC on a family of vehicles developed for the National Launch System. These systems utilize a pulse population modulated converter and field-oriented control scheme to obtain independent control of both the voltage and frequency. These techniques allow an induction motor to be operated at its maximum torque at all times. At NASA Lewis, we are building on this technology to develop our own in-house system capable of meeting the peak power requirements for an expendable launch vehicle (ELV) such as the Atlas. Our EMA will be capable of delivering 22.4 kW (30 hp) peak power with a nominal of 6.0 kW (8 hp). This system differs from the previous ones in two areas: 1) the use of advanced control methods, and 2) the incorporation of built-in-test. The advanced controls are essential for minimizing the controller size, while the built-in-test is necessary to enhance the system reliability and vehicle health monitoring. The ultimate goal of this program is to demonstrate an EMA which will be capable of self-test and easy integration into other projects. This paper will describe the effort underway at NASA Lewis to develop an EMA for an Atlas class ELV. An explanation will be given for each major technology block, and the status of the overall program will be reported.
Burrows, Linda M.Roth, Mary Ellen
Design and Evaluation of a Payload to Support Plant Growth onboard COMET 19213897/1/1992
P-MASS, the Plant-Module for Autonomous Space Support, is designed to support and provide life support for a variety of plants, algae and bacteria in low earth orbit during the maiden flight of COMET-1. The first launch is scheduled for early 1993. With a nominal mission duration of 30 days in microgravity, P-MASS will bridge the gap between the shorter duration experiments possible onboard the NSTS Space Shuttle (approximately 14 days) and the future Space Station Freedom for space biology applications. Environmental data and video images are collected, stored onboard and downlinked daily. In addition, the payload and all specimens will be returned for ground analysis with the recovery system (reentry capsule). P-MASS is designed within a payload envelope of 0.28 x 0.22 x 0.32 m (19.71) and a mass of approximately 20 kg. A total of 115 Watt electric power is available continuously for the Plant-Module (60 W lighting, 40 Watt cooling, 15 W housekeeping). Quartz halogen bulbs, or alternatively a hybrid light emitting diode lighting system (ultrabright red LED) provide 40 W/m2 photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) for the 0.06 m2 growth area. In addition to higher plants, photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic micro-organisms as well as plant cultivare/tissue cultures are supported. An active, solid state cooler allows the interdependent control of humidity and temperature, at the same time maintaining soil moisture by passive liquid management. Carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations are monitored and adjusted physically or biologically. Ground tests have verified the design concept. Plant growth experiments and life support performance tests are presently being conducted. These performance data will be used together with ground controls for on-orbit performance analysis. P-MASS, though simple and reliable in design, can provide valuable information and experience in gravitational and space biology with applications directed for future life support systems.
Luttges, M. W.Robinson, M. C.Stodieck, L. S.
The HL-20 Lifting-Body Personnel Launch System9119709/1/1991
For several years the NASA Langley Research Center has conducted in-depth research in supporting technology advancement for a concept which could complement the Space Shuttle operation and ensure the ability to transport people to and from earth orbit. The concept is called the HL-20 Lifting-Body and it has been defined as an option for future development as a Personnel Launch System (PLS). This paper will describe early lifting-body research, expected PLS mission requirements, the HL-20 concept design status, and those features which enhance aerodynamic and aerothermodynamic performance, operation efficiency, maintainability, reliability, and crew safety. The HL-20 concept evolved from early lifting-body research in the 60's and 70's and has been designed for the primary mission of changing the Space Station Freedom crew. It is sized to accommodate eight passengers plus a flight crew of two. The duration of the mission is 3 days. About 29 ft in length, the vehicle has a landing weight of 22000 lb. It is launched vertically, mounted on an expendable or partially reusable booster and has a hypersonic lift-to-drag ratio of about 1.4 with an entry cross-range of 1100 nautical miles to provide flexibility in choice of landing sites for each orbit and in opportunities for landing. Landing is horizontal on runways 10000 feet or longer. Considerable research effort has advanced the HL-20 to a fairly mature design. A broad range of wind tunnel testing has provided a substantial data base for understanding the aerothermodynamic performance and these tests have been complemented by numerous computational flow-field studies. Structural and subsystem design has focused on features which offer operational simplicity with low maintenance costs and rapid vehicle processing. Efficiency in operation is achieved through the use of airline approaches to overall system layout and access coupled with built-in test and health monitoring instrumentation. Computer-based flight simulations have involved experienced pilots and astronauts, and the HL-20 concept proved to be relatively easy to fly and to land. A full-scale model of the concept has been constructed with an interior for conducting crew accommodation studies, ingress and egress, pilot visibility, and other man machine interface investigations. Results of the HL-20 PLS research to date show that the concept has definite advantages for efficiently satisfying future needs for assured manned access to space. The vehicle is designed with operational efficiency, low life-cycle costs, reliability, and safety as the primary criteria. Should there be a decision to develop and operate the vehicle, it has been defined with a substantial technical foundation for reducing the risk of program success.
Stone, Howard W.Piland, William M.
Geostationary Earth Observatories - Key Elements of NASA's “Mission to Planet Earth”9119979/1/1991
The Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) has been given the responsibility for conceptual development of the Geostationary Earth Observatory (GEO) element of NASA's Mission to Planet Earth program. Because these multi-instrument geostationary satellites will orbit over given points on the ground, they will each provide continuous observation of large regions of the Earth and will complement other data gathering facilities in low Earth orbit (LEO) such as the polar platforms of the Earth Observing System (EOS) and the Earth Probe satellites which operate in a variety of specialized LEO's. These various systems will operate over a 15-year period to obtain data with unprecedented global and temporal coverage. Because of their Earth-fixed position, the GEO instruments will provide high temporal resolution while the LEO instruments will provide data having higher spatial and spectral resolution. These data will be used to define the hydrologic, biogeochemical, and energy cycles which constitute the Earth system. Understanding these cycles and developing the capability to predict their course are the ultimate goals of Mission to Planet Earth. In response to the recommendations of the GEO Science Steering Committee, several key instruments have been provisionally identified to provide the required scientific observations. Some of these instruments were chosen to parallel certain instruments planned for the EOS polar platforms allowing direct intercomparisons. Other instruments, including possibly a set of “operational” sensors and certain dedicated Principal Investigator (PI) sensors, will also be included on GEO. Currently, MSFC is conducting in-house and contracted design studies of the GEO spacecraft based on accommodating the provisionally selected instruments. Stringent instrument pointing and stability criteria are major observatory design drivers. The observatories are baselined for launch on the Titan IV/Centaur but would be a candidate for the National Launch System (NLS) should it become available in the required timeframe. Development of a data and information system which is responsive to the needs of the Earth Science community is a critical part of the early design definition studies now underway. As a goal, data from all GEO's would be available in near-real time to the research community of government, university, and private users. A variety of concepts is under investigation to achieve this goal including satellite linking and ground system linking. It is anticipated that GEO will evolve into a multinational program. One concept calls for five GEO's employed simultaneously around the Earth, three by the United States and two by nations such as Japan or the European Space Agency (ESA). Current technology and engineering studies indicate that the first GEO can be ready for launch shortly after the year 2000. This paper discusses in more detail the scientific rationale, required instrumentation, observatory configuration, and data system of the GEO program.
Snoddy, William C.Keller, Vernon W.
Design and Development of Composite Fairing Structures for Space Launch Vehicles9018369/1/1990
Current space transportation systems such as expendable launch vehicles (ELVs) and the reusable Space Transportation System (space shuttle) are very expensive. In some instances they are based on 10 to 20 year old technologies. Newer, lower cost technologies must be applied to designing and manufacturing the next generation of vehicles. Competing effectively in the launch vehicle industry requires an order-of-magnitude reduction in the cost per pound of payloads delivered to orbit. Payload fairings are critical structural elements in all ELV systems. In addition to carrying and transmitting vehicle loads, they also protect payloads from severe launch and in-flight environments. Developing improved fairing hardware and the associated structural, thermal, acoustic, and separation subsystems is a major undertaking. It requires extensive design, analysis, testing, and systems integration activity. To maintain a competitive posture in the launch service industry, three years ago McDonnell Douglas Space System Company (MDSSC) initiated a research and development program on composite fairings. The program investigated and refined design and analysis, process techniques, and fabrication methods for large diameter composite fairings (1,2).* Substantial progress was achieved in composite fairing material selection, design and analysis, and manufacturing methods characterization. Eight composite fairing configurations with different constructions, and five aerodynamic forebody shapes with improved performance characteristics, were evaluated and studied. A final fairing configuration was selected for further study and the fabrication of a demonstration/test article is underway. This paper presents the composite fairing structural alternatives investigated and summarizes the results of the major trade studies undertaken.
Shen, FrankPope, Dennis
Shuttle - C: Trading Performance Margin for Reduced Cost8923349/1/1989
The preliminary design of a heavy lift launch vehicle called Shuttle - C is currently under-way to provide over 100,000 lbs (45,455 kg) pay load capability to a low earth orbit of 220 nautical miles (408 km) in the early 1990's. Although derived from the Space Shuttle (Space Transportation System or STS) concept using the same elements of External Tank (ET), Solid Rocket Boosters (SRB's), and main engines (SSME's), the Shuttle - C vehicle is an expendable, unmanned launch vehicle. The program ground rules require a minimum of engineering design, development, test and evaluation (DDT&E) cost, and a compressed development schedule to meet near term mission requirements. The Shuttle - C missions encompass a wide variety of payload types such as suborbital deployment of planetary vehicles, earth orbiting platforms, Centaur missions to Geosynchronous Orbit (GEO), and Space Station assembly and logistics resupply. The current performance of a 3 engine Shuttle - C exceeds 130,000 lbs (59,091 kg) to 220 nm (408 km) due to the removal of wings, tail section, crew cabin and man support systems. By trading this excess performance margin for design cost reductions, the Shuttle - C development presents some very unique design challenges not normally experienced in launch vehicle design. Additional performance provides significant advantages to the payload community by relieving critical weight targets and permitting use of less expensive materials, processes and simplier design solutions.
Harris, R. F.
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 69