Browse Topic: Lightning protection

Items (127)
SAE CACRC has produced several standards, each representing the best-practice, recommended minimum training syllabus for the aforementioned target groups. The purpose of this document is to promote the use of these SAE standards, particularly for developing training programs for employee training, qualification in airlines and maintenance organizations, and as reference in regulatory guidance material. It summarizes, as a quick reference, the content of each training document and its relation to and interaction with other training documents. Thereby it allows users to select the appropriate training documents and syllabi to establish a comprehensive, sequential training program build-up customized to the specific needs of the aforementioned functions (see figure). This document does not intend to introduce new training content/syllabus.
AMS CACRC Commercial Aircraft Composite Repair Committee

This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) describes hydraulic system design and installation to minimize the effects of lightning, especially when the aircraft structure is composite. Techniques for effective electrical bonding, hydraulic system lightning protection, and lightning protection verification techniques are discussed.

My new committee for commercial aircrafts
This paper provides an overview of the state of art on the lightning regulation and the means of compliance for lightning certification, based on both the simulation technics and the testing methods. Usual lightning protection solutions at helicopter level to fulfill lightning requirements are discussed, as well as advanced approaches used by Airbus Helicopters to minimize the weight penalty of the lightning protection, especially by a large use of the simulation for the optimization of both the indirect effects (LIE) and the lightning direct effects (LDE). Some perspectives are highlighted concerning the development of new lightning protection devices to withstand the higher induced currents coupled on equipment items installed in full composite airframe helicopters (H/C), and how the lightning may be avoided on future platforms like the emergent flying urban taxis.
Zehar, SoniaMeyer, MarcTagliana, Bernard
Electromagnetic Compatibility and Interference - Design Methodology, Challenges and Guidelines for Avionics Product and Systems2017-01-21189/19/2017
Avionics industry is moving towards more electric & lightweight aircrafts. Electromagnetic effects becomes significantly challenging as materials starts moving towards composite type. Traditional methods for controlling EMC will not be sufficient. This shift increases the complexity of in-flight hardware elements for EMI/EMC control. This paper discusses the need for EMI/EMC Control and brings out the analysis & applicability of various EMI/EMC standards in aerospace, commercial and industrial electronic products, provides comparative study with respect to levels. The study include various sections of DO-160 and applicable guidelines for controlling EMI/EMC with respect to LRU (Line Replaceable Unit) & wire/cable harnesses. Also presents guidelines with respect to shielding of components, selection of components, grounding schemes, filter topologies and layout considerations. It provides comparative study made for different filters, good layout examples, generic simulation examples and lessons learnt from the failures. An attempt is made to propose the design methodology to be adapted for successful design for Electromagnetic effects. This paper puts forth the various challenges like size constraints, isolation requirements, component shielding, cost of EMI filters, weight, layout of- high speed & mixed signal boards and interference due to new wireless devices getting added on aircraft. The paper makes an effort to provide the possible mitigation methods for the same. Implementation methods like H-Field dominance, smaller loop area, EMI gaskets, shielding of cables and magnetic field control have been discussed. Various pain points with respect to qualification and reusability approach have been discussed. Probable solutions to overcome those have been outlined in this paper.
Vadgaonkar, Prashant Sbanik, Diptar
Circuit protection components Littelfuse Chicago, IL 773-628-1000
Aerospace - Testing of Electromechanical Actuators, General Guidelines ForARP5724 (Current)10/4/2013
This document provides an overview of the tests, and issues related to testing, that are unique to Electromechanical Actuators (EMAs). The tests, and issues documented, are not necessarily all-inclusive. This document discusses both the tests applicable to EMAs and the test methodologies to accomplish the test objectives. EMAs may be used in a wide variety of applications such as utility, secondary flight controls and primary flight controls, in a wide variety of markets including manned and unmanned civil and military aircraft, small missile fin and thrust vector control applications up to high powered utility and flight controls. EMAs may also have either a rotary or a linear output, be servo controlled or use simple open loop point-to-point or other control topologies. As such this document covers a wide range of potential applications, the application of any given test requirement is determined by the application and the user. This document attempts to provide basic guidance on which tests should be considered for various applications. This document also lists tests that are not unique to EMAs, but are still applicable to EMAs. In these instances a discussion of such tests is not contained in this document, and as applicable, the reader may reference the appropriate documents as indicated in the text. While many EMA configurations include digital power drive electronics (PDE), the specific tests required for the electronic hardware, software, or firmware are outside the scope of this document.
A-6B3 Electro-Mechanical Actuation Committee
Aircraft Structure Paint Thickness and Lightning Swept Stroke Damages2013-01-21359/17/2013
During its flight an aircraft can be struck by lightning and the induced high current will require a highly conductive airframe skin structure in order for it to propagate through with minimum damage. However an aircraft skin is generally coated with paint and the airframer does not always have control on the paint thickness. Paint thickness generates heightened concerns for lightning strike on aircraft, mainly because most of coatings dedicated to that purpose are non-conductive. Using insulating material or non-conductive coating with certain thickness may contribute to or increase damage inflicted by the swept stroke lightning energy, even on metallic structures Due to its high relative permittivity, a non-conductive paint or coating on a fuselage skin surface will contribute to slow down the lightning current propagation through structure. With this comes the risk of increasing heat that will favor structural damage and possible melt through. The correlation between paint thickness, lightning dwell time, and aircraft skin thickness are all contributing factors in lightning swept stroke damage in aircraft lightning Zone 2A. Paint thickness is not always under direct control of the manufacturer and the maximum paint thickness that could safely be applied on an aircraft skin with very low risk of puncture due to lightning is still a controversial matter. This paper introduces the analysis and investigation performed by the Bombardier Aerospace Core Engineering Electromagnetics team through several test campaigns.
Moupfouma, Fidele
Thermal Simulation and Testing of Expanded Metal Foils Used for Lightning Protection of Composite Aircraft Structures2013-01-21329/17/2013
Since the 1960's, lightning protection of aircraft has been an important design aspect, a concern for the flying public, aircraft manufacturers and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). With the implementation of major aircraft structures fabricated from carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) materials, lightning protection has become a more complicated issue to solve. One widely used material for lightning strike protection of CFRP structures within the aerospace industry is expanded metal foil (EMF). EMF is currently used in both military and commercial passenger aircraft. An issue that has historically been an area of concern with EMF is micro cracking of paint on the composite structure which can result in corrosion of the metal foil and subsequent loss of conductivity. This paper addresses the issues of stress and displacement in the composite structure layup which contribute to paint cracking caused by aircraft thermal cycling. The analysis of EMF by computer modeling is made using commercially available COMSOL Multiphysics software that is supported by data from limited experimental testing. Variables that are explored include width, height, mesh aspect ratio, weight, composition and surface layup structure. Horizontal displacement profiles parallel to the surface are utilized for performance comparisons.
Morgan, Jeffrey
Electromagnetic Protection Hazards on Composite versus Metallic Aircraft2013-01-21579/17/2013
The lightning represents a fundamental threat to the proper operation of aircraft systems. For aircraft protection, Electromagnetic Compatibility requires conductive structure that will provide among all, electromagnetic shielding and protection from HIRF and atmospheric electricity threat. The interaction of lightning with aircraft structure, and the coupling of induced energy with harnesses and systems inside the airframe, is a complex subject mainly for composite aircraft. The immunity of systems is governed by their susceptibility to radiated or conducted electromagnetic energy. The driving mechanism of such susceptibility to lightning energy is the exposure to the changing magnetic field inside the aircraft and IR voltage produced by the flow of current through the structural resistance of the aircraft. The amplitude of such magnetic field and IR voltage is related to the shielding effectiveness of the aircraft skin (wiremesh, composite conductivity). However, it is also known that copper wiremesh does not provide adequate protection from magnetic field, even though it is needed for lightning current dissipation and the reduction of the heat that could damage the structure, following a lightning strike. The protection from magnetic field on composite aircraft can be provided by ferromagnetic material that nevertheless appears too heavy for covering the whole aircraft fuselage. Thus the need for R&D activities on nano technologies for solutions providing good magnetic shielding effectiveness without impacting aircraft weight. In the scope of aircraft Electromagnetic Protection and aircraft Safety activities, Bombardier Core Engineering is conducting R&D work on aircraft structure protection from lightning, and collaborating with University of Québec at Trois-Rivières (UQTR). This paper highlights the impact of magnetic field due to lightning on composite aircraft.
Moupfouma, FideleKlim, ZdzislawSkorek, Adam
This checklist is to be used by project personnel to assure that factors required for adequate system electromagnetic compatibility are considered and incorporated into a program. It provides a ready reference of EMC management and documentation requirements for a particular program from preproposal thru acquisition. When considered with individual equipments comprising the system and the electromagnetic operational environment in which the system will operate, the checklist will aid in the preparation of an EMC analysis. The analysis will facilitate the development of system-dependent EMC criteria and detailed system, subsystem, and equipment design requirements ensuring electromagnetic compatibility.
AE-4 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Committee
Lightning Requirements: Where They Come From and How to Analyze Their Impact2012-01-214910/22/2012
Many avionics and aircraft equipment manufacturers use DO-160 [Ref. 1] Section 22 to test their equipment for indirect effects of lightning without understanding why they are testing to specific values. Many aircraft manufacturers struggle with determining the level of indirect lightning that will be acceptable for their vehicle and what level of requirements they need to pass down to the avionics and aircraft equipment manufacturers. Organizations like SAE and RTCA, Inc. work to collect data on lightning and spend countless hours assimilating the information and developing documents to help engineers use the information. They struggle with knowing what data is pertinent and how it will be received and used by the engineering community. This paper walks through the process of how the lightning levels are developed, how the levels get selected for a particular application, and how to use this information to perform an analysis of the survivability of a specific circuit in an electronic system. This paper will provide an introduction of the process that each of the three primary levels of experts use to contribute to the overall design of flight hardware that is safe to fly in a lightning environment. The purpose of this paper is to provide information to all three levels of experts about how their data is being used and what information is useful for carrying on the design process.
Harrington, James
Probability Assessment of the Fuel Tank Structural Feature Failures2011-01-251810/18/2011
The paper provides an approach to establish compliance with current regulatory standards applicable to lightning protection of the fuel tank structure for Non-Fault Tolerant Feature Failures (NFTFF) through a numerical probability assessment. The proposed procedure is using the criteria defined in the FAA Policy Guidance for fuel tank structural lightning protection and is aligned with the regulatory path described as petitioning for an exemption. Failure modes of structural components for which fault tolerance has been shown to be impractical need to be addressed and the overall likelihood of fuel vapour ignition due to these failure modes must be shown to be extremely improbable. In order to accomplish this, the quantitative assessment of the overall probability of fuel vapour ignition is performed, along with all relevant data to support the probabilities determined for the purpose of this analysis. The relevant non-fault tolerant structural design areas that may contribute to ignition sources inside the fuel tank when a failure occurs must be identified. Each type of non-fault tolerant feature failure must be assessed and the result has to be summed. The set of the potential failure modes regardless of the probability of occurrence is established by performing a complete wing tank survey in pertinent areas related to fuel tank lightning protection. If the failure assessment results in demonstrating that the design is free from ignition sources after an assessment of relevant single failure conditions, then the design is considered to be fault tolerant. If not, then further analysis is required per numerical probability assessment for the Non-Fault Tolerant Feature Failures. The subset of NFTFFs must be defined and the numerical probability assessment has to be performed. The purpose of the assessment is to substantiate that the probability of failures associated with non-fault tolerant features that might lead to a fuel tank explosion belongs to the extremely improbable category. This paper intends to provide a practical method for the fuel tank structure numerical assessment along with a real-life example illustrating a potential application.
Klim, Zdzislaw H.Skorek, Adam W.
Aerospace – Test Methodology for Electrohydrostatic ActuatorsARP5879 (Historical)4/28/2010
This document provides an overview of the tests and issues related to testing that are unique to Electrohydrostatic Actuators (EHAs). An EHA incorporates a linear or rotary hydraulic actuator and a variable speed, reversible electric servomotor driving a fixed displacement hydraulic pump for actuator control, and associated power drive electronics. The tests and issues documented are not necessarily all-inclusive. This document discusses both, the tests applicable to EHAs and the test methodologies to accomplish the test objectives. This document also lists tests that are not unique to EHAs, but are still applicable to EHAs. In these instances a discussion of such tests is not contained in this document, and as applicable, the reader may reference ARP1281 (Actuators: Aircraft Flight Controls, Power Operated, Hydraulic, General Specification For), which addresses test issues applicable to electrohydraulic flight control servoactuators. In the discussion of the tests and test methodologies contained in this document, numerical definition or specification of the test parameters to be imposed or measured is not included. These definitions or specifications should be developed to conform to the requirements of the applicable EHA technical specification document, considering the usual influencing factors such as instrumentation accuracy, test temperature, etc.
A-6B2 Electrohydrostatic Actuation Committee
Certification of Aircraft Electrical/Electronic Systems for the Indirect Effects of LightningARP5413 (Historical)3/24/2006
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) provides guidance for a means of showing compliance with the regulations for hazards caused by the lightning environment to electrical/electronic systems installed either on or within aircraft. Equipment hazards addressed include those due to indirect effects on equipment and its associated wiring that is mounted on the aircraft exterior as well as indirect effects on equipment and its associated wiring located within the aircraft interior. This document applies to new aircraft and equipment designs, modifications of existing aircraft or equipment, and applications of existing (off the shelf) equipment on new aircraft. NOTE: This ARP does not address direct effects such as burning, eroding, blasting, of aircraft structure nor does it address fuel ignition hazards (see related reading material in 2.3 of this document). This ARP does not address lightning zoning methods or lightning test requirements, methods, and techniques. Coverings (fairing, skin, cowl, etc.) should normally prevent direct attachment of the lightning channel to underlying system components. However, if a direct lightning strike attachment to a system component can occur, a complete evaluation of both direct and indirect effects will be necessary. It should be noted that electrical/electronic systems or components are sometimes exposed to lightning currents directly conducted from the aircraft exterior, as may happen when an antenna is struck and a portion of lightning current flows in its cable. Care should be taken to identify any such possibilities and either eliminate these situations by design modifications, or address them in the certification plan. No further discussion of these situations is included in this ARP.
AE-2 Lightning Committee
Probabilities of Catastrophe in Lightning Hazard Assessments2001-01-28779/11/2001
The airworthiness certification authorities specify overall probability levels for catastrophic and less severe effects on aircraft and their occupants. In lightning standards concerning threat levels and zoning for lightning attachments we speak of high and low probabilities. But, despite the certification authority’s overall figure, only one attempt has been made to interpret what that figure means for lightning protection. That one attempt was made under the EC funded FULMEN programme to estimate the degree of accuracy needed in the process of aircraft lightning attachment zoning. Without some figures, how do we know how good our designs have to be. Furthermore, as the number of flight-safety critical systems on our aircraft increases, how does the probability of failure of each change to ensure the overall figure remains the same? There are many figures we do not have, because lightning is too unpredictable an event, because we have too few measurements of the “real” lightning that we are trying to protect against, and because we have too little knowledge of the science behind the whole range of phenomena involved., Despite that we can make some intelligent guesses or estimates, at least to understand where about we are. Such an analysis would be of benefit also in the debate on whether the external threat level is adequate as it is presently defined, in furthering the understanding of the need for fidelity in attachment zoning analysis, and in defining thoroughness necessary in assessing similarity between aircraft and their installations. In this paper an attempt will be made to assess these probabilities, and some of those “guestimates” will be laid out. It is hoped that this will start some discussion and hone both the numbers and the process to something of real use.
Jones, C. C. R.Rowse, D.Odam, G. A. M.
Waveform Comparisons Between Qualification Data and Aircraft Measurements2001-01-29179/11/2001
Lightning induced current and voltage pulses are defined in international standards as arising from three distinct coupling mechanisms: capacitive, inductive and resistive. These mechanisms at their simplest give rise to distinct characteristics in the induced wave-shapes relative to the lightning current pulse that caused them. It has long been the practice to decide from a particular induced wave-shape, which was the likely induction mechanism, and compare it in terms of peak amplitude only with the relevant qualification test waveform. This approach fails to take account of the fact that almost all induced waveforms are actually a sum of two or all of the coupling mechanisms, that the coupling is not simple but gives rise to much more complex wave-shapes than the qualification standards would imply, and that there are other critical parameters apart from the peak amplitude. It may also disguise the effect of possible building/rig resonances in test results. In this paper the authors argue that this simple approach is not enough and devise a set of norms encapsulating the properties of current and voltage waveforms in simple quantities that permit a comprehensive comparison between wave-shapes. The characterisation can be done in a standard spreadsheet program provided the two sets of data can be put into a digital form.
Jones, C. C. R.Powell, ShawnGallagher, Joe
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 127