Browse Topic: Thrust reversers

Items (122)
Simulation-Driven Methodology for the Requirements Verification and Safety Assessment of Innovative Flight Control Systems2015-01-24789/15/2015
The paradigm shift to focus on an enhancement of existing aircraft systems raises the question which of the many possible incremental improvements results in an advantageous solution still considering all existing requirements. Hence, new methodologies for aircraft system design are a prerequisite to cope with such huge and complex design spaces. In the case of flight control system optimization, major design variables are the control surface configuration and actuation as well as their functional allocation. Possible architecture topologies have to be verified inter alia with respect to system safety requirements. In this context, flight dynamic characteristics and handling qualities of the fully operational as well as of several degraded system states of each topology have to be evaluated and checked against common specifications. A model-based verification of the requirements is favorable, resulting in a rapid reduction of the design space. Safety objectives for valid configurations are derived and serve as an input for a subsequent safety assessment. This two-step methodology, a simulation-driven verification of handling quality requirements and a corresponding safety assessment, is presented in this paper. The methodology is intended to support the design engineer in the early concept phase of the system architecture development process. The handling quality analysis is based on a generic flight simulation environment. Using parametric library components, various aircraft and system configurations can be modelled and automatically evaluated via an associated tool suite. Furthermore, an in-house developed analysis tool for system safety is used to carry out the safety assessment based on reliability block diagrams of the flight control architectures. To validate the proposed methodology, an existing, conventional hydraulic-powered flight control system of a single-aisle short-range aircraft is evaluated with respect to its design and safety margins.
Kreitz, TobiasBornholdt, RikoKrings, MatthiasHenning, KarstenThielecke, Frank
Power Electronic and Powerplant Environment2013-01-20819/17/2013
The power plant is the area in an aircraft where they are a lot of power conversion. The power plant is the core of the aircraft from energy point of view. The engines allow to take off but not only, it also provides energy to the aircraft from many different manners. They are electrical, hydraulic, mechanical, …. The power plant is definitively a power generator but also a power consumer. Since now some years, the power electronic technology is spread into the aircraft. One can say that some pedigree has been collected with this technology embedded to the aircraft. For the power plant domain, it is different. This technology is really not usual for use. Our environment is really not friendly and even if the integration of the power converters has been improved over the last years, there is not a lot of space around the engines. These are probably the mains reason of the low deployment of the power electronic in this domain but not only. The reliability of the thrust function is expected to be very high; of course, for safety point of view but also for cost point of view. However, the emergence of this technology for some functions close to the engine can be observed. In some areas, the hydraulic technology is replaced by the electrical one. The most outstanding one is probably the thrust reverser. This paper will provide the description of some powerplant functions that are now, or could be, supported by the power electronic technology. Weight, temperature, reliability, integration will be addressed. The future? To get the technologies that will allow to substantially reduce the fuel consumption.
Ambroise, Richard
Small Airplane Considerations for the Guidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems2013-01-22339/17/2013
On September 30, 2011, certification authorities released Advisory Circular 20-174[1], Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems, which recognizes the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) 4754A and the European equivalent ED-79A [2], in order to address “the concern of possible development errors due to the ever increasing complexity of modern aircraft and systems.” ARP4754A/ED-79A describes a process of development assurance which helps reduce the risk of design errors in the development of aircraft systems. This process is necessary for complex systems not easily comprehended by deterministic analyses or tests. This ARP was developed “in the context of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 25,” a category which includes complex systems such as full fly-by-wire flight controls. However, this paper shows that such systems are the exception to most, recent civil airplane designs. Of new airplanes designed in the last 10 years, most implement systems which are simple and easily comprehended. Many of these simpler aircraft are in the part 23 category, which the AC also associates to this ARP. This paper shows that the ARP, as written, does not consider simple systems and may unnecessarily burden the development of such systems through this lack of recognition. This paper reviews the current diversity of system complexity, discusses the regulatory and technical drivers for this diversity, and provides recommendations for incorporating such considerations in the ARP while preserving its original intent.
Voros, Robert E.
A Paradigm for Developing Operational Decision-Making (ODM) Training2001-01-30279/11/2001
The views and opinions expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of any private, public or governmental organizations. Over the past 8 years, the authors have been developing a training-oriented paradigm for operational decision-making in the cockpit. While our emphasis has been on the civil aviation side, the model can easily adapted for the business aviation venue. The paradigm began to form at an aeronautical decision-making workshop in 1992 (Lofaro, Adams and Adams; 1992) around an expanding set of interrelated concepts. The set expansion resulted from the authors continuing to wrestle with identifying and explicating the critical components and processes for real-time operational decision-making, as well as the relationships among decision-making, crew resource management (CRM) and situation awareness (SA). The first paradigm component was the “rising risk continuum” (Lofaro and Smith, 1993), as embedded in event sets for LOFT. Later, the concepts/components of “critical mission impact areas” and the “critical mission factors” (Lofaro and Smith, 1998) that composed these mission critical areas were added. The final components are the operational envelope, cumulative risk and risk location in the ops envelope (Smith and Lofaro, 2001). In the model, the “pilot as risk manager” (Smith and Hastie, 1992; Lofaro and Smith, 1998; 1999) was the both the overlay and glue for the components Recently, one author found the details of a real-life example of a Part 121 carrier approach/landing. This will used to, first, show how the model can be used in real-time and, second, contrast the decisions that would have been reached using the model with those actually reached by the Captain and, the results of the Captain’s decisions.
Smith, Kevin M.Lofaro, Ronald John
Oliver, Joseph G.
This paper is intended to give a brief overview of Concorde development and in-service operations to date. It identifies the features peculiar to Concorde as a supersonic transport and the various problems and major incidents encountered during development and service flying. Finally it covers in-service experience and identifies the most troublesome items.
Swadling, S.J.
Through transcript analysis of Air Florida's flight 90 it was determined the crash might have been prevented if proper flight deck procedures had been followed. This paper examines various facets that come into play when cockpit communications break down or become inefficient for the task at hand. Aspects dealt with include: casualness on the flight deck; lack of decisive command; improper implementation of problem solving strategies; and the concept of role differentiation, specifically as it relates to the captain acting as copilot when the first officer is handling the controls. Complacency as a result of cockpit automation, and diminishing vigilance due to technological advances are considered as problem areas. The increase in safety and reduction of operational complexity, as a result of technological innovations, is offered as a potential area of concern for flight crew alertness. A conclusion drawn from research indicates the need exists for more effective crew training in the area of group interaction and within cockpit communication.
Couchman, Darlene A.
This paper describes the Short Takeoff and Landing (STOL) and Maneuver Technology Demonstrator. It relates government requirements for performance and for specific technology to be developed. The two-dimensional, thrust vectoring and reversing engine exhaust nozzle and its integration with the control system are described. The use of modern control system design techniques to meet evolving criteria for aircraft handling during the STOL task is discussed. Use of on-board sensors to substitute for ground-based approach aids used in weather is outlined. Expected performance improvements in takeoff and landing and in maneuvering flight are related to the technology being demonstrated. The paper closes with a discussion of the potential tactical and strategic impact of the technology.
Borowski, Richard A.
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 122