Browse Topic: Liability

Items (95)
The purpose of this Standard is to provide an integrated set of fundamental processes to aid a developer in the engineering or reengineering of a system. Use of this Standard is intended to help developers a) establish and evolve a complete and consistent set of requirements that will enable delivery of feasible and cost-effective system solutions; b) satisfy requirements within cost, schedule, and risk constraints; c) provide a system, or any portion of a system, that satisfies stakeholders over the life of the products that make up the system. NOTE—The term product is used in this standard to mean: a physical item, such as a satellite (end product), or any of its component parts (end products); a software item such as a stand-alone application to run within an existing system (end product); or a document such as a plan, or a service such as test, training, or maintenance support, or equipment such as a simulator (enabling products). d) provide for the safe and/or cost-effective disposal or retirement of a system.
G-47 Systems Engineering
csp1071 test Construction of The Traffic Law and Regulation Framework for Automated DrivingSAE-PP-002902/18/2021
Road automated driving as a new generation of information technology and the integration of the transport industry's development has become a new round of global scientific and technological innovation and industrial transformation. This technology will promote the continuous upgrading of the field of road traffic. At present, the government, enterprises, and investors all take this as the goal and direction to accelerate automated driving in China. A reasonable traffic law and regulation system is required to promote the healthy development of automatic driving and fully release scientific and technological innovation subjects' vitality. Until now, China has formulated an official rule concerning the road testing of automated driving. According to this rule, no passenger and freight transportation can be officially applied using automatic vehicles. Therefore, this paper tries to construct the traffic law and regulation framework to promote automated driving development. This paper firstly summarizes the profound reform of automated driving on the road traffic industry in terms of vehicles, infrastructure, practitioners, and transportation services. Based on China's current administrative rules and traffic regulations, the legal and institutional obstacles in automatic driving are analyzed. This paper proposes a traffic law and regulation framework to promote the development of automated driving. The proposed framework can help the transport authority administrate automated driving in legal identity, demonstration application, transportation operation, practitioner management, and scene management. Finally, the policy suggestions to help develop automated driving are put forward. Through enhanced supervision, mutual recognition of qualification, regulation mode innovation, ecosystem construction, and multi-party cooperation, the automated driving market and partners' vitality can be significantly stimulated
SintzADMIN, JeneaneAnthony, Lindsay
Construction of The Traffic Law and Regulation Framework for Automated DrivingSAE-PP-002462/3/2021
Road automated driving as a new generation of information technology and the integration of the transport industry's development has become a new round of global scientific and technological innovation and industrial transformation. This technology will promote the continuous upgrading of the field of road traffic. At present, the government, enterprises, and investors all take this as the goal and direction to accelerate automated driving in China. A reasonable traffic law and regulation system is required to promote the healthy development of automatic driving and fully release scientific and technological innovation subjects' vitality. Until now, China has formulated an official rule concerning the road testing of automated driving. According to this rule, no passenger and freight transportation can be officially applied using automatic vehicles. Therefore, this paper tries to construct the traffic law and regulation framework to promote automated driving development. This paper firstly summarizes the profound reform of automated driving on the road traffic industry in terms of vehicles, infrastructure, practitioners, and transportation services. Based on China's current administrative rules and traffic regulations, the legal and institutional obstacles in automatic driving are analyzed. This paper proposes a traffic law and regulation framework to promote the development of automated driving. The proposed framework can help the transport authority administrate automated driving in legal identity, demonstration application, transportation operation, practitioner management, and scene management. Finally, the policy suggestions to help develop automated driving are put forward. Through enhanced supervision, mutual recognition of qualification, regulation mode innovation, ecosystem construction, and multi-party cooperation, the automated driving market and partners' vitality can be significantly stimulated. Keywords: Traffic Law and Regulation, Automated Driving, Administrative Rules and regulations, Road Testing, Demonstration Application, Commercial Operation
MobrxivNonAdmin, Lindsay
The Road to the Top is Not on the Map: Conversations with Top Women of the Automotive IndustryR-4919/4/2019
Carla Bailo, CEO of the Center for Automotive Research, and Terry Barclay, CEO of Inforum, bring together over 30 of the most influential women in the automotive industry to share their insight and advice. From suppliers to OEMs, they hail from every corner of the industry. Readers will learn how to take charge of their own careers by understanding the experiences these professionals. Topics include: • Work-Life Integration - How can you be whole at home, at work, and in the community? • Education and Lifelong Learning - Do you really need a graduate degree? • Mentor and Sponsor Relationships - How do you find mentors and sponsors and form productive relationships with them? • Career Challenges - How do you evaluate when to take career risks? How do you say yes when all the boxes aren't checked? • Resilience - Where do you find the internal fortitude to keep going? • Personal Satisfaction - What do these leaders find most joyful about their careers? The Road to the Top is Not on the Map features female leaders who candidly share the habits, motivations, triumphs, defeats, and lessons learned that helped them achieve top jobs in the industry. Their insights have relevance for women at all stages in their careers, whether its young women interested in pursuing a career in the auto industry, those looking for their next strategic move, or those seeking insight and inspiration. "The women in this book share a passion for their careers and a passion for the industry. They have encountered obstacles and the occasional failure, as well as successes, but they have embraced all their earned wisdom and generously agreed to share it." Creating a book club during office hours is a great way for team members to draw upon the eperiences of thought leaders. The Road to the Top is Not on the Map is the perfect book to start with as the leaders profiled share their experiences, and challenge readers to evaluate their own choices. Book Club Kirs are available for companies wishing to start an employee Book Club. For special pricing on quantity orders (minimum 25 copies), please contact an SAE International Sales Representative: (P) 1-888-875-3976 (US) (P) 1-724-772-4086 (Outside US) Fax: 724-776-3087 E-Mail: customersales@sae.org
Bailo, CarlaBarclay, Terry
The field called System Safety evolved to satisfy the demand for an organized approach to safety management of complex new aerospace systems being developed in the 1960s. As technology has advanced and complexity has increased, its application spread to aviation, rail transportation, weapons, nuclear power, medical devices, oil and gas production, and almost every area of life where complex systems could lead to events having high consequences. System Safety is often defined as the application of engineering and management principles, criteria, and techniques to achieve acceptable mishap risks within the constraints of operational effectiveness, time, and cost throughout all phases of the system life cycle. The International System Safety Society states that for almost any system, product, or service, the most effective means of limiting product liability and accident risks is to implement an organized system safety function beginning in the conceptual design phase, and continuing through to its development, fabrication, testing, production, use, and ultimate disposal.
Hewitt, John
Avoiding Safety Scandals by Controlling the Risk of Material Changes2017-01-03733/28/2017
Achieving functional safety in mechatronic systems with growing product functionality is a major challenge in systems engineering. Following the current discussion, this challenge is mostly allocated to electronics and software development. For most of the scenarios this focus is feasible. Product design - the construction of the product - defines the properties and the appearance of the product by shape, material and assembly. So, the product design is often not under control of the safety management system. A hazardous deviation of part shape can be easily identified after the parts product or at least at its mounting. A wrong assembly is controlled by assembly documentation or data (e.g. screw torques) and identified at end of assembly line checks. The identification of a hazardous material choice depends on the product material class. Product materials can be separated into two classes: passive or active materials. Passive materials (e.g. car body) can be distinguished in as passive materials with constant shape (stiff) and variable shape (flexible) (e.g. damper, spring). The liability of those materials regarding their usage in the product is tested in labs in prototypes in prior. Active materials (e.g. fluids, gases), or functional materials fulfill, trigger or directly influence the functionality of the product. The choice of a functional material is not always made by the electronics engineering. Therefore, it is not under control of safety management processes. Never the less functional material, especially with radical behavior, underlie other safety regulation. Explosives for example, can be integrated in a product or system and are restricted by specific standards. This technology report reflects the verification methods of functional materials today. The responsibility of the product design engineer is discussed as well as the relevant standards. The challenge of achieving complete product compliance with functional materials is shown by the technology analysis of the Takata airbag recall. The required and available methods to control risks of functional materials choice and change are listed and rated. Gaps in existing engineering processes and regulations are identified. A strategy to close those gaps is explained.
Koark, Fabian Jorg UweBeul, Christian
G-33 Configuration Management
This SAE Standard standardizes practices to: a maximize availability of authentic materiel, b procure materiel from reliable sources, c assure authenticity and conformance of procured materiel, including methods such as certification, traceability, testing and inspection appropriate to the commodity/item in question, d control materiel identified as fraudulent/counterfeit, e and report suspect or confirmed fraudulent/counterfeit materiel to other potential users and Authority Having Jurisdiction.
G-21 Counterfeit Materiel Committee
This SAE Aerospace Standard standardizes practices to: a maximize availability of authentic parts, b procure parts from reliable sources, c assure authenticity and conformance of procured parts, d control parts identified as counterfeit, e and report counterfeit parts to other potential users and Government investigative authorities.
G-19 Counterfeit Electronic Parts Committee
Motorsports Industry Knowledge Exchange (MiKE): Oxymoron or Holy Grail (An Imperative for Sustaining Regional, National and Global Competitiveness)2006-01-361012/5/2006
Of all high-performance engineering industries, motorsports perhaps exemplifies best the unique combination of key engineering and business elements vital for swift, industry-focused, successful, high-technology product advancement. This heady mix includes: complex market analysis; sophisticated research, design and development capability; rapid product innovation, prototyping and development; just-in-time manufacturing using state-of-the-art processes; and regular mandated exhibition of company competitiveness, involving (at the highest environs) demonstration of both personnel and new product capability and reliability, on an unforgiving world stage, invariably to ensure continuing investor (sponsor) confidence. Such examples of motorsport's disparate business model elements in many ways demonstrate fundamentally the industry's absolute reliance on what in corporate speak is now termed ‘brains trust’ or ‘human capital’. Invariably, however, funding for academic faculties (certainly in the UK) is now predicated largely on speculative - and in many respects unrealistic - future student intake numbers, driven by institution/Government recruitment targets, which are rigorously-policed. The corollary is that institutions can now no longer simply be considered as seats of learning - instead, they increasingly reside, sometimes uncomfortably, in the aggressive business domain of skills, education, training and research provision, where the marketplace is open, competitive and formidably-discerning, and majors on informed, industry-driven service provision. Thus, it is surprising, but perhaps understandable, that the arranged marriage of the academia-based skills/expertise purveyor, and the ostensibly-eager industry recipient of such services, remains largely unconsummated. The Objective of this paper is to: identify key enablers and inhibiters, perceived and actual, to successful motorsports industry-academe interaction; investigate inhibiters, to offer theoretical and practical insights into the reasons why key stakeholders in the process believe such barriers exist, indeed persist, and in some ways are perpetuated; provide instances of successes and failures in industry-academe technology and knowledge transfer; detail a number of mechanisms to aid the catalyzing of vital industry-academe technology and knowledge transfer.
Meechan, Mike
Re-Thinking Traffic Safety: The Global Situation, The Behavioral Model, Strategies for Improvement2006-21-006310/16/2006
Recent United Nations and World Health Organization reports and resolutions indicate that the world has and is experiencing ever-increasing, epidemic and catastrophic levels of automotive violence as we use our cars. Meanwhile, many U.S. traffic safety agencies, government and influential business concerns have been reluctant to consider or adopt “public policy” measures based on a cultural “behavior model” to improve road users’ understanding, ability and safety performance.[1] Concerted measures and approaches to set standards and improve upon or solve human error/performance difficulties are well documented in all fields of human endeavor, except with and for U.S. drivers. These tactics are rejected as a way to resolve this “public problem”, even in the face of demonstrated successes elsewhere in the world. There is little agency and governmental confidence in the driving public's ability to improve. The pressure toward a more intelligent vehicle or intelligent transportation system is to eventually supercede the individual driver's intelligence, judgment or maneuverability. The moral question is, upon whose judgment will the driver be dependent should the vehicle be made self-directed? Should the car be made as driverless as a roller coaster? Would drivers be then helpless to prevent or protect themselves from other potential mishaps? Who would be responsible then? If the computer crashes, it'll still be on the desk. In the case of every speed limit sign being “chipped” to control each vehicle's speed within a local area, or the community traffic control regulating several thousand vehicles, in the event of failure or sabotage of the system the chaos would be immediate without other independent redundancy. What is the potential for the “arrogance of intelligence” or “blindness of ideology”[2] to replace personal, individual decision-making, judgment, and choice. Policies that would reduce these Jeffersonian principles can potentially be implemented without public awareness or consensus. Producing significant, individual personal improvements on a national or global scale is a daunting task. But then, if individual drivers have fundamental control over the vehicle, shouldn't society provide for, encourage, expect and require, individually, more “expert” control and decision making? The analogy is; the iceberg did not hit the Titanic, but the Titanic tragedy undoubtedly improved the standards of intercontinental marine shipping just as FAA investigations prevent and reduce air mishaps. “Sound science” and technology will continue to make substantive contributions in the equipment and efforts to assist and manage the operative control of the vehicle within its environment. However, can these externally applied controls manage populations dependent on convenient, independent, discretionary mobility? Developing and producing ever-better equipment and controls eventually focuses conscious decision making on someone, somewhere. In driving, it too frequently happens “all of a sudden”. Let's think about that. It seems we can accomplish almost anything we can imagine. What decisions are made, who makes them and how; that is the subject of this paper. The automotive manufacturing industries and the engineering community can take this opportunity to offer substantive and influential contributions and recommendations regarding the safer and more effective use of their products. The industry can initiate a “hands-on approach’ advocating a collective “Zero Error”, “One-Mind-at-a-Time”, “Take Away the Excuses” driver improvement campaign. What would be the value of public informational campaigns, educational priorities, training standards, requirements, evaluation and enforcement compared with and beyond the price, cost, toll and loss of this continuing global catastrophe?
Green, Robert P.
This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) is intended to promote awareness of the dangers associated with the carriage and use of pyrotechnic signaling devices in multi-place life rafts and slide/rafts on transport category aircraft. Also included is background information and a rationale for replacing these devices with alternative signaling devices, which offer effective signaling and reduced flammability, yielding an “equivalent level of safety,” as required by the FAA for replacement of the required pyrotechnic signaling device.
S-9A Safety Equipment and Survival Systems Committee
Opportunities and Hindrances to Collaborative Automotive Development2006-01-14694/3/2006
The automotive industry is a global industry in which regulatory, economical, and practical issues act not only as incentives, but as barriers and also drivers to collaboration. This paper specifically deals with regulatory and economical reasons to increase collaboration in vehicle development and manufacturing. It discusses typical socio-cultural and technical differences impacting German / North American business relationships, and shows which activities in the product development process have to be changed or added if a vehicle is to be designed and produced globally. A survey of the capabilities and weaknesses of current collaboration tools supports the material presented. The paper is a summary of a presentation held in May 2005 at BMW Munich by the co-authors. It is based on industry data, on University research and on knowledge gained by the BMW Front Desk office, the office responsible for integration of US suppliers' development resources at the BMW Manufacturing Plant in Spartanburg, SC. It offers the readers a candid view of collaboration challenges, and concludes with challenges to the design community: Understand differences and recognize the context in which these differences evolved. Appreciate the value of the differences and learn what opportunities emerge from such differences. Collaborate; Current tools already allow a significant level of synchronous and asynchronous collaboration.
Weber, JulianFadel, Georges
The purpose of this Standard is to provide an integrated set of fundamental processes to aid a developer in the engineering or reengineering of a system. Use of this Standard is intended to help developers a) establish and evolve a complete and consistent set of requirements that will enable delivery of feasible and cost-effective system solutions; b) satisfy requirements within cost, schedule, and risk constraints; c) provide a system, or any portion of a system, that satisfies stakeholders over the life of the products that make up the system. NOTE—The term product is used in this standard to mean: a physical item, such as a satellite (end product), or any of its component parts (end products); a software item such as a stand-alone application to run within an existing system (end product); or a document such as a plan, or a service such as test, training, or maintenance support, or equipment such as a simulator (enabling products). d) provide for the safe and/or cost-effective disposal or retirement of a system.
G-47 Systems Engineering
Target Cost Management for Product Safety9503342/1/1995
This paper presents an application of target cost management (TCM) to the design of product safety in the automobile industry. Product safety occupies a prominent position among corporate strategic plans because safety issues can drive a company to the brink of bankruptcy and even threaten the entire existence of an industry. Safety issues contain legal, marketing, technological, cost and other dimensions, all of which demand ever-greater emphasis on this issue. At the same time, safety has become a moving target whose meaning is subject to court interpretation and societal norms. However, safety cannot be augmented infinitely. A manufacturer is constrained by cost and profitability benchmarks. Companies can use TCM to optimize their focus on safety issues. This paper shows how value engineering (VE), a TCM technique, can help minimize the costs of safety components, while satisfying engineering, product and customer concerns. After several iterations, the final recommended design of these components brings all of them into the optimal value region. The contributions of this paper include: (1) developing product safety into three (preventative, protective and failure-effect reductive) safety forms, and (2) simplifying the application of VE techniques to these forms by constructing concrete steps, thereby helping the company to routinize its major safety production processes.
Bayou, Mohamed E.Reinstein, Alan
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 95