Browse Topic: Defense industry

Items (1,702)
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
This standard includes ISO 9001:20152 quality management system requirements and specifies additional aviation, space, and defense industry requirements, definitions, and notes. It is emphasized that the requirements specified in this standard are complementary (not alternative) to customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. If there is a conflict between the requirements of this standard and customer or applicable statutory or regulatory requirements, the latter shall take precedence. This International Standard specifies requirements for a quality management system when an organization: a needs to demonstrate its ability to consistently provide products and services that meet customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, and b aims to enhance customer satisfaction through the effective application of the system, including processes for improvement of the system and the assurance of conformity to customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. All the requirements of this International Standard are generic and are intended to be applicable to any organization, regardless of its type or size, or the products and services it provides. NOTE 1: In this International Standard, the terms “product” or “service” only apply to products and services intended for, or required by, a customer. NOTE 2: Statutory and regulatory requirements can be expressed as legal requirements.
G-14 Americas Aerospace Quality Standards Committee (AAQSC)
The H-60 Black Hawk remains a cornerstone of U.S. Army Aviation, but its legacy avionics architecture presents modernization challenges. To ensure long-term operational relevance and interoperability with future platforms like the Future Long Range Assault Aircraft (FLRAA), the Army is implementing a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA). This strategy facilitates rapid technology integration, enhances sustainment efficiency, and mitigates obsolescence. The Army's MOSA adoption aligns with regulatory mandates such as the National Defense Authorization Act and Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition policies, ensuring modularity, scalability, and interoperability across aviation systems. The application of modern open standards, such as the Future Airborne Capability Environment (FACE®), within the Black Hawk supports software reuse and hardware commonality, reducing lifecycle costs and vendor lock. A phased modernization approach, including a Digital Backbone architecture supported by Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE), will streamline future avionics upgrades while maintaining compatibility with existing and future fleet assets. This transformation positions the Black Hawk for sustained operational effectiveness in multi-domain operations, reinforcing the Army's aviation modernization objectives.
Willis, Tim
New forms of highly automated Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) aircraft, such as electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) vehicles, could transform transportation, cargo delivery, and a variety of public services. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) conducted a series of flight demonstrations in collaboration with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and Sikorsky Aircraft (a Lockheed Martin company) to progressively evaluate autonomous technologies. The autoland flight test research is a first in series for investigating the world’s first procedural descending-decelerating automated landing with vertical guidance Instrument Flight Procedures (IFP). The Sikorsky Optionally Piloted Vehicle (OPV) experimental UH-60 Black Hawk was used to evaluate a flight path’s four-dimensional trajectory (4DT) management into primitive commands and then follow those commands to a Point-in-Space (PinS) landing to the ground. All flight procedures were manually flown to the ground at 12 degrees with a 20-knot tail wind to ensure flight safety before automation was engaged. New and novel high precision approach procedures could pave the way for all future VTOL operations.
Zahn, DavidPatterson, GayleWilliams, EthanEggum, SarahFettrow, Tyler
Ever-increasing modeling and simulation capabilities and the desire to use simulations in support of system qualification, regulatory compliance, and other critical decision-making roles, raises the bar on the need for rigorous V&V of all aspects of the models used to create the simulation data. US Department of Defense Directives and Instructions, and emerging regulatory and industry standards on Modeling and Simulation in a Digital Engineering context require rigorous M&S Verification, Validation, and Accreditation (M&S VV&A). These specifications aim to create trusted and credible simulation data that can be used in critical decision-making roles on complex systems. Implementing a well-defined, structured, model-based and standards-based M&S VV&A Process early in the program lifecycle facilitates collaboration and documented buy-in on M&S VV&A for program with customers and/or regulatory agencies. This collaboration increases acceptance throughout the program and product lifecycles. This paper describes how Model-Based Systems Engineering tools and Digital Engineering ecosystems can support the M&S VV&A Process. The model-based construct facilitates creating metrics dashboards, leveraging model-based artifacts for improved communication of M&S VV&A status, quality, maturity, and completeness.
Hill, James
ABSTRACT Today’s combat vehicle designs are largely constrained by traditional manufacturing processes, such as machining, welding, casting, and forging. Recent advancements in 3D-Printing technology offer tremendous potential to provide economical, optimized components by eliminating fundamental process limitations. The ability to re-design suitable components for 3D-printing has potential to significantly reduce cost, weight, and lead-time in a variety of Defense & Aerospace applications. 3D-printing will not completely replace traditional processes, but instead represents a new tool in our toolbox - from both a design and a manufacturing standpoint.
Deters, Jason
ABSTRACT The complexity of ground vehicle mission systems has evolved significantly over the last few years resulting in over-taxed platforms with federated mission suites. Department of Defense (DoD) is pursuing platform evolution toward integrated mission suites. Opportunities exist to apply aspects of previously developed methodologies from the aviation sector to ground platforms. This paper describes the parallels of the evolution of aviation platforms with the similarities to ground platforms. Solutions from the military aviation community will be discussed that could reduce development risks, schedules and costs and improve mission capabilities for ground applications. Specific discussion will be on opportunities and techniques to transition performance driven, high cost, low volume technologies into mission suitable and affordable high volume solutions. Discussion of the feedback opportunities into the aviation community will be addressed. This paper is not intended to be a tutorial on systems engineering but rather a stimulus for industry and the DoD to discuss commonality and design reuse opportunities between the ground and aviation communities resulting in a “system of systems” bridging aviation and ground solutions.
Hensley, Marion P.
Gong, AnthonyTischler, MarkShalev-Eggert, Ohad
This document is limited to the aerospace industry, where an approved manufacturer requests a supplier to ship an article against the approved manufacturer’s quality system directly to a customer. The direct ship process is not required or applicable to standard parts or military parts. In this process, the approved manufacturer is responsible for assurance that the article conforms to type design information.
G-14 Americas Aerospace Quality Standards Committee (AAQSC)
This Standard specifies the Habitability processes throughout planning, design, development, test, production, use and disposal of a system. Depending on contract phase and/or complexity of the program, tailoring of this standard may be applied. The primary goals of a contractor Habitability program include: Ensuring that the system design complies with the customer Habitability requirements and that discrepancies are reported to management and the customer. Identifying, coordinating, tracking, prioritizing, and resolving Habitability risks and issues and ensuring that they are: ○ Reflected in the contractor proposal, budgets, and plans ○ Raised at design, management, and program reviews ○ Debated in Working Group meetings ○ Coordinated with Training, Logistics, and the other HSI disciplines ○ Included appropriately in documentation and deliverable data items Ensuring that Habitability requirements are applied to all personnel environments, including operators, maintainers, trainers, and support personnnel. Identifying and pursuing opportunities to reduce Habitability costs. Ensuring that Habitability considerations are addressed in analyses, design decisions, trade-offs, and design changes (e.g., Engineering Change Proposals (ECP)). Conducting Habitability analysis activities and supporting human factors analyses (e.g., workload analysis) and other HSI domain analyses to provide evidence to support design decisions and trade-offs and to coordinate shared data. Ensuring that Habitability analyses, results and recommendations are timely, technically competent/complete, and included in design decisions, tradeoffs, and changes. Ensuring that environments experienced by subjects in experiments, simulations, tests, evaluations, and demonstrations are consistent with the customer’s Habitability requirements and meet the U.S. Government and DoD policies for protecton of human subjects. Ensuring that Habitability issues discovered in test, evaluation, demonstration, Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E), and operations are resolved in a technically competent/complete and timely manner.
G-45 Human Systems Integration
This SAE standard establishes the requirement for suppliers to plan a reliability program that satisfies the following three requirements: a The supplier shall ascertain customer requirements b The supplier shall meet customer requirements c The supplier shall assure that customer requirements have been met
G-41 Reliability
This standard is applicable to all items used for manufacturing, maintenance, and repair of aviation, space, and defense products from the raw material to the final product (e.g., aircraft, structural items, constituent assemblies, standard parts, consumables with conformity and/or safety impact). This standard considers items dispositioned as scrap in accordance with 9100-series standards’ supporting nonconformity management, corrective action, or organization decisions (e.g., obsolescence, inventory management, missing traceability documentation). The requirements specified in this standard are complementary (not alternative) to contractual and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. Should there be a conflict between the requirements of this standard and applicable statutory or regulatory requirements, the applicable statutory or regulatory requirements take precedence. This standard defines requirements and actions to be taken after the disposition decision to control the unsalvageable items within the organization and its external providers.
G-14 Americas Aerospace Quality Standards Committee (AAQSC)
This document establishes test plans/procedures for the AS5643/1 Slash Sheet. The AS5643/1 Slash Sheet establishes guidelines for the use of IEEE Std 1394-2008 as a data bus network in military and aerospace vehicles. It encompasses the data bus cable and its interface electronics for a system utilizing S400β over copper medium over extended lengths.
AS-1A Avionic Networks Committee
This Engineering Bulletin and its annexes provide guidance on the application of Human Engineering principles and practices to the analysis, design, development, testing, fielding, support, accident investigation, and training for military and commercial products throughout their intended life cycles.
G-45 Human Systems Integration
The purpose of this Standard is to support the development and improvement of systems engineering capability.
G-47 Systems Engineering
The purpose of this Standard is to provide an integrated set of fundamental processes to aid a developer in the engineering or reengineering of a system. Use of this Standard is intended to help developers a) establish and evolve a complete and consistent set of requirements that will enable delivery of feasible and cost-effective system solutions; b) satisfy requirements within cost, schedule, and risk constraints; c) provide a system, or any portion of a system, that satisfies stakeholders over the life of the products that make up the system. NOTE—The term product is used in this standard to mean: a physical item, such as a satellite (end product), or any of its component parts (end products); a software item such as a stand-alone application to run within an existing system (end product); or a document such as a plan, or a service such as test, training, or maintenance support, or equipment such as a simulator (enabling products). d) provide for the safe and/or cost-effective disposal or retirement of a system.
G-47 Systems Engineering
This SAE Standard establishes the requirements for nondispersant, mineral lubricating oils to be used in four-stroke cycle piston aircraft engines. This document covers the same lubricating oil requirements as the former military specification MIL-L-6082. Users should consult their airframe or engine manufacturers manuals for the latest listing of acceptable lubricants.
E-38 Aviation Piston Engine Fuels and Lubricants
The use of additive manufacturing to produce rotorcraft components is challenging due to demanding material property performance requirements. The need to contend with high cycle fatigue, fretting, and vibratory loading conditions has driven our industry to use high pedigree materials that are fully characterized and with well established and understood processes to transform them into parts. No additive manufacturing processes or materials approach this level of understanding today, making it difficult to utilize the technology to manufacture components designed to be produced using conventional methods. This has limited consideration of the technology in the sustainment segment of our business. Customers have a quite different perspective. Additive manufacturing has been identified by the Department of Defense as a critical technology for the sustainment of their vehicles and weapons systems. Each branch of the military and the Defense Logistics Agency has resources and facilities established to support the proliferation of 3D printing capability. They have all experienced success producing shop aides, tools, prototypes, and surrogate parts to address real time, point of use challenges in depots and in some cases, at or near the battlefield. This success has prompted the DoD to challenge our industry to find ways to utilize this technology to address component shortages due to obsolescence, lost tooling, or a lack of qualified sources. This paper presents Sikorsky's activities and programs that have been initiated to meet this challenge. This will include approaches for component characterization and business case analysis used to evaluate the practicality of using additively manufactured surrogate parts in legacy vehicles.
C., William
The U.S. Department of Defense has begun the acquisition of the next generation of military rotorcraft, named Future Vertical Lift (FVL), to replace its aging fleet. U.S. Army Futures Command intends to sustain FVL under a new strategy of maintenance free operating periods (MFOP). This study developed a discrete event simulation to evaluate MFOP success given component reliabilities, desired MFOP duration, and operational tempo of a battalion with thirty aircraft. The simulation compared notional FVL aircraft with improved reliability to today's fleet. Results indicated that inherent reliability alone was insufficient to achieve MFOP goals and that prognostics and diagnostics with robust information management are necessary. Sensitivity studies found the recovery effort after an MFOP was linked to the MFOP duration. Recovery downtime was tied to both the duration and operational tempo. Availability and cost improved with moderate gains in MFOP duration by eliminating unnecessary preventive maintenance but overextending the MFOP sacrificed aircraft dependability for marginally greater availability and savings.
Beigh, MatthewBurgess, JamesSchrage, DanielBellocchio, Andrew
The United States Marine Corps often operate their helicopters in austere environments where degraded visual environments (DVE) such as brownout are regularly encountered. DVE significantly increase the risk to operations and have led to many mishaps across the Department of Defense. In response, engineers from the United States Navy are designing a system to augment the legacy flight control system (FCS) on the CH-53E. The system is designed to preserve the legacy FCS functionality to limit the impact on the current platform airworthiness and reduce developmental flight test. The Low Speed Precision Control (LSPC) system provides decel-to-hover with position hold functionality, allowing the pilot to modulate command references via trim beepers, cyclic fly through, and trim release. A piloted simulator test was performed with three test pilots to evaluate the handling qualities with and without LSPC engaged, in several fleet representative conditions. LSPC was found to reduce workload marginally in good visual environments and in low light conditions; however more substantial reductions were shown for approaches into brownout conditions. In addition, LSPC was shown to significantly reduce lateral drift during final approach into brownout and lateral and longitudinal drift in a hover. Inherent system bandwidth limitations were found to degrade the performance of the system for anything more than moderate control inputs. Overall, LSPC was successful in augmenting fleet representative approaches in the simulator for degraded visual environments.
Rhinehart, MatthewBrymer, RobertO'Neill, Eric
A primary factor for the development of military avionics systems is the requirement for a Modular Open System Architecture (MOSA). The US Department of Defense (DoD) is driving MOSA-compliant systems to achieve benefits in cost and flexibility within their procurements. MOSA definitions are examined in light of advances in computing disciplines that open the interfaces necessary for the aircraft operator to update and manage their fleet's Health Awareness Systems (HAS). Opening the relevant HAS interfaces via software configuration toolsets and MOSA building blocks avoids contracting for costly software changes and gives control of the update to the operator. Two business related factors are presented for consideration in developing the best way forward while using MOSA principles to guide development. These factors are (1) Intellectual Property (IP) and (2) the underlying investments companies make to develop IP. The need to routinely update the HAS to incorporate fleet lessons learned is inherent in the system's support. Updates may also reflect new methodologies that deliver the desired system control to the operator. The paper demonstrates a MOSA-compliant architecture via an example. Within the example, efficiencies are driven by an end-to-end Digital Thread that minimizes errors and rework while reducing the overall cost of change for the full platform lifecycle. The approach enables organic operator support, lowering the overall cost of aircraft operations. The design and support of the platform’s Health Awareness System benefits from the application of linked-automation.
Thomson, MarkCaraway, LoganTucker, Brian
On August 1, 1963, the first two Canadian Sea King helicopters arrived at their new home station, Shearwater, Nova Scotia and joined the Royal Canadian Navy. On Saturday, December 1, 2018, three Canadian Sea King helicopters, now part of the Royal Canadian Air Force, made their final flight over their home station at Patricia Bay, British Columbia. This paper outlines some of the highlights of the intervening 55 years with particular emphasis on procurement and fleet introduction, the helicopter's rapid change of roles from dedicated anti-submarine warfare helicopter to a general-purpose surveillance platform for the First Gulf War and finally, the truly amazing accomplishments of the Canadian Sea Kings in the year 2010. It is worth bearing in mind that although the personnel may have changed and the roles and equipment of the aircraft have been modified, the requirement to provide ‘Wings for the Fleet’ has remained constant over the years.
(Retd.), Colonel
This Standard covers Manpower and Personnel (M&P) processes throughout planning, design, development, test, production, use, and disposal of a system. Depending on contract phase and/or complexity of the program, tailoring can be applied. The scope of this standard includes Prime and Sub-contractor M&P activities; it does not include Government M&P activities. The primary goals of a contractor M&P program typically include: Ensuring that the system design complies with the latest customer manpower estimates (numbers and mix of personnel, plus availability) and that discrepancies are reported to management and the customer. Ensuring that the system design is regularly compared to the latest customer Personnel estimates (capabilities and limitations) and that discrepancies are reported to management and the customer. Identifying, coordinating, tracking, and resolving M&P risks and issues and ensuring that they are: ○ Reflected in the contractor proposal, budgets, and plans. ○ Raised at design, management, and program reviews. ○ Debated in Working Group meetings. ○ Coordinated with Training, Logistics, and the other HSI disciplines. ○ Included appropriately in documentation and deliverable data items. Identifying and pursuing opportunities to reduce Manpower and Personnel demands and costs. Ensuring that M&P considerations are addressed in analyses, design decisions, trade-offs, and design changes (e.g., ECPs). Conducting Manpower and Personnel analysis activities and supporting human factors analyses (e.g., workload analysis) and other HSI domain analyses to provide evidence to support design decisions and trade-offs and to coordinate shared data (e.g., task analyses). Ensuring that M&P analyses and results are timely, technically competent/complete, and in a format that enables them to be included in design decisions, tradeoffs, and changes. Ensuring that M&P issues discovered in test, evaluation, demonstration, Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E), and operations are tracked and resolved in a technically competent/complete and timely manner. Ensuring that the subjects used in experiments, simulations, tests, evaluations, and demonstrations are consistent with the customer’s latest projected target audiences.
G-45 Human Systems Integration
This document applies to hardware and software and provides CM requirements to be placed on contracts after being tailored by the Acquirer. The requirements have been organized by the following five CM functions: a Configuration Planning and Management b Configuration Identification c Configuration Change Management d Configuration Status Accounting e Configuration Verification and Audit
G-33 Configuration Management
This specification establishes the classification, technical requirements, tests, and test procedures for the qualification, approval, and quality verification of all materials used in the liquid penetrant methods of inspection with the exception of those excluded in the application section.
AMS K Non Destructive Methods and Processes Committee
This specification covers carbon steel (1025) tubing of aircraft quality.
AMS E Carbon and Low Alloy Steels Committee
The purpose of this document is to provide detailed requirements to preclude the use of suspect counterfeit or counterfeit fasteners. The requirements of this document are intended to supplement the requirements of a higher-level quality standard (e.g., AS/EN/JISQ9100, ISO 9001, ANSI/ASQC E4, ASME NQA-1, AS9120, AS9003, and ISO/TS 16949 or equivalent) and other quality management system documents. Fasteners are defined as United States Federal Supply Classification Group codes as shown in the following list: This document applies to metallic and non-metallic components that mechanically attach two or more objects: fasteners, screws, bolts, rivets (blind, solid, tubular), inserts, washers, nuts, latching handles, clamps, pins, nails, retainers, etc. If locking or treatment elements such as glue, adhesives, anti-galling, lubricant, or other materials are part of the fastener specifications, then those items are within the scope of this document. For metallic raw materials used in the manufacturing of fasteners, refer to AS6279. This document does not apply to connectors such as pneumatic or hydraulic fittings and electrical connectors. Appendices A, B, C, and D are guidance.
G-21 Counterfeit Materiel Committee
This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) offers an overview of the aspects of intellectual property (IP) protection, legislative compliance, business model, and technologies which need to be considered and addressed to implement a data interoperability, secure business model and technology platform to enable prognostics and health management (PHM) in the digital age. While this information report is restricted to the aerospace domain and also to commercial aviation, the concepts are applicable to any other domain that employs data for supporting health management functionality.
G-31 Electronic Transactions for Aerospace Committee
Balancing Lifecycle Sustainment Cost with Value of Information during Design Phase2020-01-01764/14/2020
The complete lifecycle of complex systems, such as ground vehicles, consists of multiple phases including design, manufacturing, operation and sustainment (O&S) and finally disposal. For many systems, the majority of the lifecycle costs are incurred during the operation and sustainment phase, specifically in the form of uncertain maintenance costs. Testing and analysis during the design phase, including reliability and supportability analysis, can have a major influence on costs during the O&S phase. However, the cost of the analysis itself must be reconciled with the expected benefits of the reduction in uncertainty. In this paper, we quantify the value of performing the tests and analyses in the design phase by treating it as imperfect information obtained to better estimate uncertain maintenance costs. A multi-attribute decision framework for military ground vehicles acquisition is employed to illustrate the methodology and the value of performing the analysis early in the system’s lifecycle. Attributes considered are maintenance cost and operational availability, while the utility is calculated for a risk averse decision maker. Numerical methods are employed to calculate the value of sample information and reflect an increase in expected utility (EU) after collecting the information. While less than the value of perfect information that completely eliminates outcome uncertainty, results demonstrate a positive value for testing. This value determines the maximum amount that should be spent on testing given the anticipated benefits.
Kassoumeh, SamMajcher, MonicaEaly, JamesGorsich, DavidJayakumar, ParamsothyPandey, Vijitashwa
Unsettled Topics Concerning Automated Driving Systems and the Development Ecosystem SAAS Demo 10-17-23EPR20200043/17/2020
With over 100 years of operation, the current automobile industry has settled into an equilibrium with the development of methodologies, regulations, and processes for improving safety. In addition, a nearly $2-trillion market operates in the automotive ecosystem with connections into fields ranging from insurance to advertising. Enabling this ecosystem is a well-honed, tiered supply chain and an established development environment. Autonomous vehicle (AV) technology is a leap forward for the existing automotive industry; now the automobile is expected to manage perception and decision-making tasks. The safety technologies associated with these tasks were presented in an earlier SAE EDGE™ Research Report, “Unsettled Technology Areas in Autonomous Vehicle Test and Validation.” In a later SAE EDGE™ Research Report, “Unsettled Topics Concerning Automated Driving Systems and the Transportation Ecosystem,” senior executives from the automotive ecosystem explored the impact of AV technology as they faced the prospect of this disruptive technology entering their marketplace. Interestingly, stable use-models and market penetration were all gated primarily by the demonstration of AV safety. Building on these previous verification and validation (V&V)-related reports, “Unsettled Topics Concerning Automated Driving Systems and the Development Ecosystem” explores the open issues in the shift of the development and supplier environment toward a new AV-enabled future. NOTE: SAE EDGE™ Research Reports are intended to identify and illuminate key issues in emerging, but still unsettled, technologies of interest to the mobility industry. The goal of SAE EDGE™ Research Reports is to stimulate discussion and work in the hope of promoting and speeding resolution of identified issues. SAE EDGE™ Research Reports are not intended to resolve the challenges they identify or close any topic to further scrutiny.
Razdan, Rahul
Introduction to Control Volume Based Transient Thermal Limit2020-01-00393/10/2020
Advancement in modern aircraft with the development of more dynamic and efficient technologies has led to these technologies increasingly operated near or at their operation limits. More comprehensive analysis methods based on high-fidelity models co-simulated in an integrated environment are needed to support the full utilization of these advanced technologies. Furthermore, the additional information provided by these new analyses needs to be correlated with updates to traditional metrics and specifications. One such case is the thermal limit requirement that sets the upper bound on a thermal system temperature. Traditionally, this bound is defined based on steady-state conditions. However, advanced thermal management systems experience dynamic events where the temperature is not static and may violate steady-state requirements for brief periods of time. Due to the large thermal time constants for many components, such transient violations may not represent system failure and an understanding of transient temperature limits is beneficial. To meet this need, this paper introduces the transient thermal limit via control volume representation. Instead of a constant thermal limit, the transient thermal limit approach generates a dynamic temperature profile limit by representing the thermal system with a control volume and scaling the input temperature profile such that the control volume does not exceed the steady-state temperature limit. This simple approach is based on a physical representation that is customizable to each system and can dynamically adjust the limit based on system conditions. Additionally, this control volume transient temperature limit methodology was developed to minimize information sharing between proprietary systems. The details of this transient limit generation methodology will be reviewed in this paper and illustrated through application on an example thermal system.
Yeu, RodneyDeppen, TimRaczkowski, BrianJones, NicholasWalters, EricDonovan, AdamPatnaik, SoumyaBodie, Mark
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 1702