Browse Topic: Landing gear

Items (643)
AIR120425-1
A-10 Aircraft Oxygen Equipment Committee
This document outlines the current state of the art in the understanding of gas in solution in shock absorber oils in unseperated shock absorbers. A literature review, overview of Henry's law, Henry's law coefficients for known gas and oil couples, in-service operational problems, lessons learned, and potential future work will be discussed in the document.
A-5B Gears, Struts and Couplings CommitteeNEW
This information report provides general guidance for the design considerations, qualification in endurance, strength and fatigue of landing gear using composite components as principle structural elements. The information discussed herein includes the development and evaluation of design data considering: the potential for imbedded manufacturing defects, manufacturing process variations, the component operating environment, potential damage threats in service, rework and overhaul, and inspection processes. This AIR mainly discusses the use of thick composites for landing gear structural components. Considerations and recommendations provided in this AIR may therefore differ greatly from considerations and recommendations found in widely accepted composite design references such as CMH-17 and Advisory Circulars such as AC 20-107(B).
A-5B Gears, Struts and Couplings CommitteeNEW

This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) describes hydraulic system design and installation to minimize the effects of lightning, especially when the aircraft structure is composite. Techniques for effective electrical bonding, hydraulic system lightning protection, and lightning protection verification techniques are discussed.

My new committee for commercial aircrafts
Verifying large alternate product code for an AIR document
A-10 Aircraft Oxygen Equipment Committee
A landing gear system comprises the most compelling assembly of engineering skills. Its importance to the successful design of an aircraft can be favorably compared with that of the aircraft's wings and engines. A landing gear system consists of several different engineering disciplines, and is continually in the public eye especially with regard to safety. The primary objective of AIR4846 is to present a record of a variety of interesting gears, gear/aircraft systems and patents, and to discuss wherever possible the lessons learned, and the reasons for the design. Thus, the document is not only a historical account, but a means of recording technical knowledge for the practical benefit of future landing gear designers. Commendable efforts have been made over the years by several individuals to make such recordings, and AIR4846 will make continual reference to them. This applies to all books, papers, or specifications that have the approval of the SAE A 5 Committee. AIR4846 also accepts the premise that an essential aircraft requirement can often justify a gears' complexity and consequent weight. However, the document's purpose is not to recommend, but to provide reliable, authenticated information. Hence, the gear designer would be better equipped to adjudicate trade studies rationally, while not restricting his/her innovative skills. Each gear design feature will be associated with as many aircraft examples as possible, and every effort will be made to ensure accuracy, authenticity, and detail clarity. Section 2 of this document describes the features of landing gear which are addressed in the specific descriptions of various landing gears (Category A). Also, special types of landing gear are categorized as Category B.
A-5B Gears, Struts and Couplings CommitteeNEW
The purpose of this report is to outline types of in-service heat damage that have been observed in high strength steel landing gear components, with an emphasis on a particular type that is referred to as “Ladder Cracking” which can develop in landing gear shock struts. The report discusses how ladder cracking can be detected visually and evaluated by non-destructive inspection methods, and how it can be repaired at overhaul with the prior approval of the Original Equipment Manufacturer. This report also describes the use of a bearing material that has resolved this problem without introducing other problems. Examples of other types of service induced heat damage are also discussed.
A-5B Gears, Struts and Couplings CommitteeNEW
With advanced air mobility (AAM) vehicles becoming an increasingly popular topic in aviation, the Eagle Flight Research Center (EFRC) at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University continues to investigate control strategies that enhance aircraft resilience to total power unit failures. Utilizing a distributed electric propulsion (DEP) quad-heli test bed, the EFRC has explored a variety of control laws and hardware configurations to evaluate their effectiveness under failure conditions, including sustained flight with a completely inoperative rotor. The aircraft utilizes a fractional-order PID (FOPID) controller that has recently been developed and shown to outperform conventional PID controller used previously in both nominal and failure scenarios. The use of a FOPID controller offers improved stability and tracking performance. Another development is the implementation of a split-rotation rotor configuration—where the left-side rotors rotate clockwise and the right-side rotors rotate counterclockwise—which, when combined with a control law leveraging cyclic rotor inputs for yaw control, provides a robust alternative to conventional quadrotor designs. This configuration leverages the redundancy offered by equipping each of the aircraft's four rotors with full helicopter controls, enhancing the potential for sustained flight in the event of two rotor failures while preserving the maneuverability and controllability characteristic of the conventional configuration. Additionally, to support expanded testing and operational capability, the aircraft has been outfitted with a custom-designed landing gear system, designed and fabricated by the EFRC team.
Chernak, HarryCollins, KyleDeveerasetty, Kranthi KumarHruswicki, PatricRazvi, Syed Zuhair Ali
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) provides standardized gland (groove) design criteria and dimensions for O-ring seal glands for static and dynamic applications, and other seals.
A-6C2 Seals Committee
The intent of this SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) is to document the design requirements and approaches for the crashworthy design of aircraft landing gear. This document covers the field of commercial and military airplanes and helicopters. This summary of crashworthy landing gear design requirements and approaches may be used as a reference for future aircraft.
A-5B Gears, Struts and Couplings Committee NEW Name Goes Her
This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) covers the field of civilian, commercial and military airplanes and helicopters. This summary of tail bumper design approaches may be used by design personnel as a reference and guide for future airplanes and helicopters that require tail bumpers. Those described herein will consist of simple rub strips, structural loops with a wear surface for runway contact, retractable installations with replaceable shock absorbers and wear surfaces and complicated retractable tail landing gears with shock strut, wheels and tires. The information will be presented as a general description of the installation, its components and their functions.
A-5B Gears, Struts and Couplings Committee NEW Name Goes Her
This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) provides an overview of the tire properties, strut properties, damper properties, and other landing gear mechanical properties that contribute to shimmy stability and are required for shimmy analysis. A variety of analysis techniques and assumptions are presented.
A-5 Aerospace Landing Gear Systems Committee
ABSTRACT
Rocher, AntoninBecquet,  RolandMaré, Jean-Charles
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) covers an alternate gland design for the installation of scraper/wiper rings in the lower end of landing gear shock struts for the purpose of contaminant exclusion. The defined scraper gland covered by this document, as shown in Table 1, is a variant of AS4716, the accepted gland standard for MS28775, O-ring packing seals. Piston rod diameters, gland internal diameters, groove sidewall angles and the surface finish are all defined by AS4716, but the gland outer retaining wall diameter is changed. The traditional scraper design installed into the glands detailed in Table 1 typically utilize components made from urethane or nitrile materials. These scraper designs, while still acceptable, must be reviewed in consideration to deicing, cleaners and disinfectant fluids applied to or in contact with the landing gear, as the materials of construction for the installed scrapers may not be compatible to these fluids. Exposure of the scraper to incompatible fluids is likely to reduce the performance of the scraper. In addition, an alternative scraper gland is also covered by this document and shown in Table 2. It is also a variant of AS4716, however this gland has a reduced atmospheric gland lip and profiled lead in geometry to allow for a PTFE jacket metal spring energized scraper to be installed. The advantages of the PTFE jacket metal spring energized scraper design is that the materials of construction are chemically inert, greatly reducing the possibility of negative performance due to incompatibility with deicers, cleaners and disinfectant fluids. AS4088 is similar to the hardware design in Table 1 of this document, which was developed by SAE A-6 for flight control and general-purpose cylinders. It differs from this document primarily by the clearance between the rod (piston) and outer gland wall.
A-5B Gears, Struts and Couplings Committee NEW Name Goes Her
This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) covers the field of civilian, commercial and military airplanes and helicopters. This summary of tail bumper design approaches may be used by design personnel as a reference and guide for future airplanes and helicopters that require tail bumpers. Those described herein will consist of simple rub strips, structural loops with a wear surface for runway contact, retractable installations with replaceable shock absorbers and wear surfaces and complicated retractable tail landing gears with shock strut, wheels and tires. The information will be presented as a general description of the installation, its components and their functions.
A-5B Gears, Struts and Couplings Committee NEW Name Goes Her
This SAE Information Report (AIR) provides descriptions of High Lift Systems of commercial and military aircraft. The main focus is on mechanical systems which may be actuated hydraulically or electrically.
A-6B3 Electro-Mechanical Actuation Committee
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) defines gland details for scrapers for rod diameters from 1/4 to 15-1/2 inch (6.35 to 393.70 mm) inclusive, corresponding to AS568 O-ring Dash No. sizes -108/-111, -206/-222, -325/-349, and -425/-460. The gland details herein allow the use of more stable, efficient, and reliable scraper devices than MS33675 glands.
A-6C2 Seals Committee
Rotorcraft, like most machines, require periodic lubrication tasks to ensure continued safe and reliable operation. Optimal lubrication intervals are desired to maintain system performance while minimizing aircraft downtime and maintenance labor. Boeing and AMRRI conducted a Lubrication Optimization Study (LOS) on the H-47 Chinook helicopter to establish the necessary engineering artifacts to define the grease lubrication intervals for selected Drive, Rotor, and Landing Gear components. Grease samples were collected from these components by H-47 operators from multiple nations and submitted for a laboratory analysis to characterize how wear, properties and contaminants change as time and aircraft hours accumulate. The LOS also revealed opportunities to further evaluate and leverage the data produced in this study, including determining superior performance of specific lubricants within the Mil-Spec designation, testing of greases for compatibility5 when mixed, and enhancing new grease cleanliness to extend component life.
Singer, TimJohnson, MikeWurzbach, Richard
This information report provides general guidance for the design considerations, qualification in endurance, strength and fatigue of landing gear using composite components as principle structural elements. The information discussed herein includes the development and evaluation of design data considering: the potential for imbedded manufacturing defects, manufacturing process variations, the component operating environment, potential damage threats in service, rework and overhaul, and inspection processes. This AIR mainly discusses the use of thick composites for landing gear structural components. Considerations and recommendations provided in this AIR may therefore differ greatly from considerations and recommendations found in widely accepted composite design references such as CMH-17 and Advisory Circulars such as AC 20-107(B).
A-5B Gears, Struts and Couplings Committee NEW Name Goes Her
The intent of this document is to provide recommended practices for conducting shock absorption testing of civil aircraft landing gear equipped with oleo-pneumatic shock absorbers. The primary focus is for Part 25 aircraft, but differences for Part 23, 27, and 29 aircraft are provided where appropriate.
A-5B Gears, Struts and Couplings Committee NEW Name Goes Her
This document establishes the minimum training and qualification requirements for ground-based aircraft deicing/anti-icing methods and procedures. All guidelines referred to herein are applicable only in conjunction with the applicable documents. Due to aerodynamic and other concerns, the application of deicing/anti-icing fluids shall be carried out in compliance with engine and aircraft manufacturers’ recommendations. The scope of training should be adjusted according to local demands. There are a wide variety of winter seasons and differences of the involvement between deicing operators, and therefore the level and length of training should be adjusted accordingly. However, the minimum level of training shall be covered in all cases. As a rule of thumb, the amount of time spent in practical training should equal or exceed the amount of time spent in classroom training.
G-12T Training and Quality Programs Committee
This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) provides guidelines for the development of landing gear fatigue spectra for the purpose of designing and certification testing of Part 25 landing gear. Many of the recommendations herein are generalizations based on data obtained from a wide range of landing gears. The aircraft manufacturer or the landing gear supplier is encouraged to use data more specific to their particular undercarriage whenever possible.
A-5B Gears, Struts and Couplings Committee NEW Name Goes Her
Advanced Assembly Solutions for the Airbus RACER Joined-Wing Configuration2019-01-18849/16/2019
The Rapid And Cost Effective Rotorcraft (RACER) is being developed by Airbus Helicopters (AH) to demonstrate a new Vertical Take-Off and Landing configuration to fill the mobility gap between conventional helicopters and aeroplanes. RACER is a compound rotorcraft featuring wings and multiple rotors. The wing arrangement suggested by AH is defined as a staggered bi-plane joined configuration with an upper and a lower straight wing, either side of the fuselage, connected at their outboard extent to form a triangular structure. The ASTRAL consortium, consisting of the University of Nottingham and GE Aviation Systems, are responsible for the design, manufacture, assembly and testing of the wings. Producing an optimised strategy to assemble a joined-wing configuration for a passenger carrying rotorcraft is challenging and novel. The objective of this work concerns all aspects of assembling the joined-wing structure. The joined-wing and fuselage structures will be produced independently and mated together during the final RACER assembly. A multi-stage process will deliver the joined-wing assembly and ensure it will fit to the fuselage. Producing the individual wing structures requires a novel build philosophy driven by the innovative, one-piece composite moulding that forms the leading edge (LE) and upper aerodynamic surface of each wing. Using the Flap sub-assembly as the tool to set interfacing wing-box items provides a cost effective solution to assembly jig design. The independent wing structures must be joined at the outboard hinge line, whilst meeting the fuselage interchangeability definition. Matched tooling, replicating the fuselage interface, will be employed to overcome this hurdle. Successfully joining the wing structures also requires the innovative application of 3D tolerance analysis methods to size bush diameters within the interface. The overall build philosophy is summarised in this work, including assembly sequencing; definition of datum frames; assembly tooling; design tolerances and the analysis required to deliver assembly key characteristics.
Bainbridge, DavidBacharoudis, KonstantinosCini, AndreaTurner, AlisonPopov, AtanasRatchev, Svetan
Landing Gear Integration into Aircraft Structure in Early Design Stage2019-01-18909/16/2019
The demanded development towards various emission reduction goals set up by several institutions forces the aerospace industry to think about new technologies and alternative aircraft configurations. With these alternative aircraft concepts, the landing gear layout is also affected. Turbofan engines with very high bypass ratios could increase the diameter of the nacelles extensively. In this case, mounting the engines above the wing could be a possible arrangement to avoid an exceedingly long landing gear. Thus, the landing gear could be shortened and eventually mounted at the fuselage instead of the wings. Other technologies such as high aspect ratio wings have an influence on the landing gear integration as well. To assess the difference, especially in weight, between the conventional landing gear configuration and alternative layouts a method is developed based on preliminary structural designs of the different aircraft components, namely landing gear, wing and fuselage. Simplified parametric finite element structural models for the different components are introduced. These models are used to investigate different aircraft configurations with special regard on the landing gear integration. The structural models of the fuselage and the wing are sized according to defined load cases. After this first sizing step, the structural model of the landing gear is integrated and different landing gear load cases are applied. The developed methods aim to assess the impact of the different landing gear configurations, not only regarding the landing gear structure but also the surrounding support structure of the airframe. Results of the applied methods for aircraft configurations with different landing gear integration are presented and discussed.
Kling, UlrichHornung, Mirko
Robotic landing gear (RLG) enhance the landing capabilities of vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft on sloped, rough, and even mobile landing surfaces. This DARPA funded research demonstrates the design, integration, and ground and flight testing of a RLG system for the commercial S-100 Camcopter, expanding the aircraft's landing capabilities to currently inaccessible terrains with slopes at and above 15°. Lagrange unconstrained and multibody dynamic simulations are elucidated and implemented to design a force feedback controller, state estimation algorithms, and drivetrain components that permit the rotorcraft fuselage to remain level on rough terrain. The system is then demonstrated using ground and flight experiments, and performance metrics are found to match design metrics. An asymmetry in left and right leg landings during flight testing is observed and analyzed as arising due to inertial cross coupling inherent to landing with three-legged rotorcraft. Finally, future work and improved RLG controllers are presented.
Leon, BenjaminRimoli, JulianLeo, Claudio
A high-fidelity engineering simulation model has been developed in FLIGHTLAB for a Sikorsky production helicopter to support future design modifications. The simulation model consists of major subsystems for main rotor, tail rotor, fuselage, empennage, landing gear, flight control system, and propulsion system. As the manufacturer, Sikorsky was able to provide a complete and validated set of model data and a large database of flight test records to ensure the model quality and fidelity. Although the model correlation with test data is satisfactory in most flight conditions including hover, low-speed flight, level flight, and vertical climb, some model-data discrepancies were seen in the forward climb/descent and autorotation test cases. An additional study was conducted at Sikorsky to investigate these discrepancies. Based on the study, a set of model enhancements were developed to improve the model correlation with test data in forward climb/descent and autorotation. These enhancements allow for adjustment of certain semi-empirical corrections to address model limitations at these challenging conditions such as fuselage characteristics and interference at high angles of attack and rotor inflow and interference at low collective settings and near 90-degree wake skew. These enhancements were carefully designed such that the effects were localized so that the model-data correlation was not adversely impacted in other flight conditions. The model-data correlation in forward climb/descent and autorotation were significantly improved by implementing these model enhancements with little to no impact on the other flight conditions resulting in a high-fidelity engineering simulation model validated in the entire flight envelope.
Xin, HongZhang, ChiDriscoll, Joseph
The intent of this document is to provide recommended practices for conducting shock absorption testing of civil aircraft landing gear equipped with oleo-pneumatic shock absorbers. The primary focus is for Part 25 aircraft, but differences for Part 23, 27, and 29 aircraft are provided where appropriate.
A-5B Gears, Struts and Couplings Committee NEW Name Goes Her
Landing Response Analysis on High-Performance Aircraft * Using Estimated Touchdown States01-12-01-00014/8/2019
A novel use of state estimation methods as initial input for a landing response analysis is proposed in this work. Six degrees of freedom (DOF) non-linear landing response model is conceived by considering longitudinal dynamics of aircraft as a rigid body with heave-and-pitch motions coupled onto a bicycle landing gear† arrangement. The DOF for each landing gear consist of vertical and longitudinal motions of un-sprung mass, considering strut bending flexibility. The measurement data for state estimation is obtained for three landing cases using non-linear flight mechanics model interfaced with pilot-in-loop simulation. State estimation methods such as Upper Diagonal Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter (UD-AEKF) with fuzzy-based adaptive tuning and Un-scented Kalman Filter (UKF) were adapted for landing maneuver problem. On the basis of estimation error metrics, aircraft state from UKF is considered during onset of touchdown. These estimated states are used as an initial condition for the six DOF non-linear landing response model, numerically solved in Matlab environment. The dynamic responses such as displacement, velocity, and acceleration for the aircraft and the loads on landing gears such as vertical and drag (spin-up and spring-back) forces were presented. The uncertainty in noisy measurement data being over or under quantified and the sensitivity of landing loads toward variation in key aircraft state, such as vertical descent rate, are cohesively brought out. The significance of the methodology evolved in this work is highlighted in the context of critical event such as “hard landing” that demands accurate landing loads estimation for structural integrity assessment.
Suresh, P.S.Sura, Niranjan KumarShankar, K.
Increasing Development Assurance for System and Software Development with Validation and Verification Using ASSERT™2019-01-13703/19/2019
System design continues to trend toward increasing complexity as more functionality is added to aviation systems and the level of automation is increased. Since exhaustive validation and verification of this functionality becomes increasingly difficult, reliance on development assurance is needed to provide confidence that errors in requirements, design and implementation have been identified and corrected. To address this need for increased development assurance, GE is introducing a tool called ASSERT™ (Analysis of Semantic Specifications and Efficient generation of Requirements-based Tests). The system developer uses this tool to capture requirements in an unambiguous way with built-in semantic error checking. The requirements analysis engine is then used to assist in requirements validation to identify common problems which may include requirements that conflict with one another, requirements that do not fully specify the behavior of a function, requirements that are not independent of one another, and requirements that are either always true or false. Having unambiguous and complete requirements also enables the tool to consistently generate a complete set of requirements-based test cases and procedures to ensure the implemented product performs its intended functions and only the intended functions. This paper will detail how the ASSERT™ tool assists the system developer in performing validation and verification to increase development assurance on an example representative aerospace product beyond what a system developer could traditionally do on their own.
McMillan, CraigCrapo, AndyDurling, MichaelLi, MengMoitra, AbhaManolios, PanagiotisStephens, MarkRussell, Daniel
The Application of Additive Manufacturing to the 2018 SAE Aero Design Challenge2019-01-13283/19/2019
This project focuses on the application of polymer additive manufacturing to the 2018 SAE Aero Design Regular Class competition for North Carolina A&T State’s 2017/2018 senior project team. The Regular Class SAE Aero Design challenge requires participating teams to create a high lift, high efficiency remote controlled aircraft that is designed to carry as many passengers and additional cargo mass as possible while still being able to meet land and air performance requirements defined by the competition rules. Constraints set by the competition rules include material constraints, a max gross weight of 55 lb, a limited power supply of 1000 W, a 12-ft wingspan limitation, enclosed cargo and passenger bays, the ability to unload and load all cargo and return the plane to a flight ready configuration within 1 minute, and a takeoff distance of 200 ft. The wide use of additive manufacturing and hot wire foam cutting for this aircraft design has allowed for accurate and efficient component production, as well as increased design complexity compared to traditional manufacturing methods seen at competition. Most importantly, the use of these manufacturing methods has allowed for efficient design change implementations and quick turnaround times. Specific examples include the light weight, high fineness ratio fuselage that efficiently used space and integrated landing gear and mounting structures, which was made with ABS and polycarbonate polymers. Additional examples include the implementation of shock absorbing landing gear wheels, which were made of fatigue resistant PETG. Results show that the use of innovate manufacturing methods such as additive manufacturing and hot wire foam cutting helped to increase prototyping and testing efficiency, and enabled quick production of an organically shaped, high performing RC aircraft.
Blake, Nathan DavidWaters, CynthiaEsau, SimonKizito, John
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 643